IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bracre/v57y2025i1s0890838925000071.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reprint of: Nineteenth century audit reports: Evolution from free-form to standardised wording

Author

Listed:
  • Brennan, Niamh M.
  • Power, Sean Bradley

Abstract

The research comprises a case study focussed on the wording of 34 audit reports of the British South Africa Company (BSAC), which Cecil Rhodes established by Royal Charter to colonise Rhodesia from 1889 to 1924. The accounts were audited by Cooper Brothers & Co., now PricewaterhouseCoopers. The research analyses three audit-report characteristics that influenced audit-report wording. Of the 34 audit reports, eight contained qualified (i.e., unfavourable) audit opinions. Based on verbatim annual general meeting minutes and private correspondence, we provide evidence of the effect of the audit qualifications. The research further analyses the evolution of the audit-report wording over the period. Initially, the auditors customised the audit-report wording. Each year, they made micro changes to improve the precision of the wording. Then, in 1911, well in advance of any audit-report regulations, the wording became standardised and remained so until the end of the study period. The paper adds insights into why auditors standardised audit-report wording. We conjecture that years of struggling with customised wording prompted the auditors to adopt standardised wording. We do not know whether this decision applied just to the BSAC audit reports, or whether 1911 heralded standardised audit-report wording for all Cooper Brothers & Co. audit reports.

Suggested Citation

  • Brennan, Niamh M. & Power, Sean Bradley, 2025. "Reprint of: Nineteenth century audit reports: Evolution from free-form to standardised wording," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:57:y:2025:i:1:s0890838925000071
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2025.101557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838925000071
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101557?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513579610116330 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Elizabeth Gutierrez & Miguel Minutti-Meza & Kay W. Tatum & Maria Vulcheva, 2018. "Consequences of adopting an expanded auditor’s report in the United Kingdom," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1543-1587, December.
    3. Gustav Johed & Bino Catasús, 2018. "Auditor Face‐Work at the Annual General Meeting," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 365-393, March.
    4. Janette Rutterford, 2017. "The Distant Shareholder: Attenuated Investment and the Diffusion of Social Concerns," Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance, in: William A Pettigrew & David Chan Smith (ed.), A History of Socially Responsible Business, c.1600–1950, chapter 0, pages 157-188, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-09-2019-4166 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Power, Sean Bradley & Brennan, Niamh M., 2022. "Accounting as a dehumanizing force in colonial rhetoric: Quantifying native peoples in annual reports," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Roy Chandler, 2019. "Auditing and corporate governance in nineteenth century Britain: the model of the Kingston Cotton Mill," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 269-286, May.
    8. Sean Bradley Power & Niamh M. Brennan, 2021. "Corporate reporting to the crown: a longitudinal case from colonial Africa," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(4), pages 946-982, January.
    9. Patti A. Mills, 1990. "Agency, Auditing and the Unregulated Environment: Some Further Historical Evidence," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(1), pages 1-1, April.
    10. Toms, J. S., 2002. "The rise of modern accounting and the fall of the public company: the Lancashire cotton mills 1870-1914," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(1-2), pages 61-84.
    11. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513579010003575 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Andrew Popp, 2000. "Specialty production, personal capitalism and auditors' reports: Mintons Ltd., c.1870-1900," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 347-369.
    13. Derek Matthews & Michael Peel, 2003. "Audit fee determinants and the large auditor premium in 1900," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 137-155.
    14. Rönnbäck, Klas & Broberg, Oskar, 2022. "From Defensive to Transformative Business Diplomacy: The British South Africa Company and the End of Chartered Company Rule in Rhodesia, 1910–1925," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 96(4), pages 777-803, December.
    15. Beattie, Vivien, 2014. "Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: Issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 111-134.
    16. Roy Chandler & John Richard Edwards, 1996. "Recurring issues in auditing: back to the future?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(2), pages 4-29, May.
    17. Rutterford, Janette, 2012. "The Shareholder Voice: British and American Accents, 1890–1965," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 120-153, March.
    18. Bryer, R. A., 1993. "The late nineteenth-century revolution in financial reporting: Accounting for the rise of investor or managerial capitalism?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 18(7-8), pages 649-690.
    19. John Richard Edwards & Brian West, 2021. "The problematical nature of auditor independence: a historical perspective," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 255-285, September.
    20. Brennan, Niamh M. & Edgar, Victoria C. & Bradley Power, Sean, 2024. "Director and shareholder interactions at shareholder meetings: Compromising accountability in the service of colonialism," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    21. Dale L. Flesher & Gary John Previts & William D. Samson, 2005. "Auditing in the United States: a historical perspective," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 41(1), pages 21-39, February.
    22. Bailey, Ke & Bylinski, Jh & Shields, Md, 1983. "Effects Of Audit Report Wording Changes On The Perceived Message," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(2), pages 355-370.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brennan, Niamh M. & Edgar, Victoria C. & Bradley Power, Sean, 2024. "Director and shareholder interactions at shareholder meetings: Compromising accountability in the service of colonialism," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    2. Valerio Antonelli & Raffaele D?Alessio & Emanuela Mattia Cafaro & Michele Bigoni, 2019. "The Pope and the Train: Financial Reporting Practices in the Railroad Companies of the Papal States (1846-1870)," CONTABILIT? E CULTURA AZIENDALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 7-34.
    3. Wang, Ruizhe & Chua, Wai Fong & Simnett, Roger & Zhou, Shan, 2024. "Is greater connectivity of financial and non-financial information in annual reports valued by market participants?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(6).
    4. Napier, Christopher J., 2006. "Accounts of change: 30 years of historical accounting research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(4-5), pages 445-507.
    5. Smith, Kecia Williams, 2023. "Tell Me More: A content analysis of expanded auditor reporting in the United Kingdom," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Toms, Steven, 2005. "Financial control, managerial control and accountability: evidence from the British Cotton Industry, 1700-2000," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(7-8), pages 627-653.
    7. Himick, Darlene, 2016. "Actuarialism as biopolitical and disciplinary technique," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 22-44.
    8. Duan, Mingli, 2025. "The signaling effect of tone: The influence of key audit matters’ tone on bank lending decisions," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    9. Gary S. Monroe & David R. Woodliff, 1994. "Great Expectations: Public Perceptions Of The Auditor's Role," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 4(8), pages 42-53, November.
    10. Dale L. Flesher & Gary John Previts & William D. Samson, 2017. "Working on the Railroad: Public Accounting Talent in the United States—The Case of Haskins & Sells (Now Deloitte)," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 53(1), pages 133-157, March.
    11. Ma, Jin & Coram, Paul & Troshani, Indrit, 2024. "The effect of key audit matters and management disclosures on auditors’ judgements and decisions: An exploratory study," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    12. Saher Aqel, 2014. "Independent Auditor’s Report: Messages Conveyed and Implications," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 5(5), pages 5-17, October.
    13. Boone, Jeff & Hao, Jie & Linthicum, Cheryl & Pham, Viet, 2024. "Impression management strategy — The relationship between accounting narrative thematic bias and financial graph distortion," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(4).
    14. Leung, Sidney & Parker, Lee & Courtis, John, 2015. "Impression management through minimal narrative disclosure in annual reports," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 275-289.
    15. Bryer, R. A., 2005. "A Marxist accounting history of the British industrial revolution: a review of evidence and suggestions for research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 25-65, January.
    16. Gorton, Gary, 2024. "Inland Bills of Exchange: Private Money Production without Banks+," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Mohammed Adel Elzahaby, 2023. "Corporate narrative disclosure practices in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region: a systematic literature review," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 296-315, September.
    18. Tarek Abdelfattah & Mohamed Elmahgoub & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2021. "Female Audit Partners and Extended Audit Reporting: UK Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 177-197, November.
    19. Ali A. Al-Thuneibat & Basheer Ahmad Khamees & Nedal A. Al-Fayoumi, 2008. "The effect of qualified auditors' opinions on share prices: evidence from Jordan," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(1), pages 84-101, January.
    20. Alain Burlaud & Michel Messina & Peter Walton, 1996. "Depreciation: concepts and practices in France and the UK," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 299-316.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:57:y:2025:i:1:s0890838925000071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-british-accounting-review .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.