IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v98y2011i4p632-638.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanism of improved phosphate uptake efficiency in banana seedlings on acidic soils using fertigation

Author

Listed:
  • Pan, N.
  • Shen, H.
  • Wu, D.M.
  • Deng, L.S.
  • Tu, P.F.
  • Gan, H.H.
  • Liang, Y.C.

Abstract

Fertigation improves nutrient uptake efficiency greatly, while the mechanism of increased nutrient uptake efficiency remains unclear. In this study, the effects of conventional phosphate (P) fertilization (by mixing fertilizer with soils) and fertigation (by dissolving fertilizer in water) on P uptake were compared in banana (Musa sapientum) seedlings. Results indicated that, compared with conventional fertilization, fertigation increased the concentration of available P by 108% and decreased the P sorption index by 31% in the 0-8Â cm surface soil of banana roots. Fertigation enhanced the transformation of different P fractions, increased the concentrations of aluminum-bound P (Al-P), iron-bound P (Fe-P) and occluded-P (O-P), and decreased the pH value by 0.3 units. However fertigation did not influence the activity of acid phosphatase, but increased microbial biomass and root activity by 25.5-67.8%. Furthermore, fertigation increased the root distribution in the 0-8Â cm soil layer by 7.8-9.4% compared with conventional fertilization. These results suggest that fertigation increases P uptake efficiency as the result of increased root activity, root distribution, microbial biomass and reduced P sorption index in the surface soil of banana seedlings.

Suggested Citation

  • Pan, N. & Shen, H. & Wu, D.M. & Deng, L.S. & Tu, P.F. & Gan, H.H. & Liang, Y.C., 2011. "Mechanism of improved phosphate uptake efficiency in banana seedlings on acidic soils using fertigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 632-638, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:98:y:2011:i:4:p:632-638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378-3774(10)00361-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bhat, Ravi & Sujatha, S., 2009. "Soil fertility and nutrient uptake by arecanut (Areca catechu L.) as affected by level and frequency of fertigation in a laterite soil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 445-456, March.
    2. Erdem, Tolga & ArIn, Levent & Erdem, Yesim & Polat, Serdar & Deveci, Murat & Okursoy, Hakan & Gültas, Hüseyin T., 2010. "Yield and quality response of drip irrigated broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) under different irrigation regimes, nitrogen applications and cultivation periods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(5), pages 681-688, May.
    3. Cetin, O. & Bilgel, L., 2002. "Effects of different irrigation methods on shedding and yield of cotton," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Komlan Koudahe & Aleksey Y. Sheshukov & Jonathan Aguilar & Koffi Djaman, 2021. "Irrigation-Water Management and Productivity of Cotton: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Reeta Ghimire & Suryamani Dhungana, 2021. "Comparative Advantage of Areca Nut Over Rice in Jhapa, Nepal," Reviews in Food and Agriculture (RFNA), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 9-15, January.
    3. Pongspikul, Tayatorn & McCann, Laura M., 2020. "Farmers’ Adoption of Pressure Irrigation Systems: The Case of Cotton Producers in the Southeastern versus Southwestern U.S," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304332, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Fan, Yubing & Wang, Chenggang & Nan, Zhibiao, 2014. "Comparative evaluation of crop water use efficiency, economic analysis and net household profit simulation in arid Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 335-345.
    5. Çetin, Öner & Uygan, Demet, 2008. "The effect of drip line spacing, irrigation regimes and planting geometries of tomato on yield, irrigation water use efficiency and net return," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 949-958, August.
    6. Cheng, Minghui & Wang, Haidong & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Shaohui & Wang, Yanli & Li, Yuepeng & Sun, Xin & Yang, Ling & Zhang, Fucang, 2021. "Water productivity and seed cotton yield in response to deficit irrigation: A global meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    7. Iulia Dolganova & Natalia Mikosch & Markus Berger & Montserrat Núñez & Andrea Müller-Frank & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2019. "The Water Footprint of European Agricultural Imports: Hotspots in the Context of Water Scarcity," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-11, August.
    8. Ünlü, Mustafa & Kanber, RIza & Koç, D. Levent & Tekin, Servet & Kapur, Burçak, 2011. "Effects of deficit irrigation on the yield and yield components of drip irrigated cotton in a mediterranean environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 597-605, February.
    9. Guo, Lijie & Cao, Hongxia & Helgason, Warren D. & Yang, Hui & Wu, Xuanyi & Li, Hongzheng, 2022. "Effect of drip-line layout and irrigation amount on yield, irrigation water use efficiency, and quality of short-season tomato in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    10. Aujla, M.S. & Thind, H.S. & Buttar, G.S., 2005. "Cotton yield and water use efficiency at various levels of water and N through drip irrigation under two methods of planting," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 167-179, February.
    11. Cheng, Minghui & Wang, Haidong & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Shaohui & Liao, Zhenqi & Zhang, Fucang & Wang, Yanli, 2021. "A global meta-analysis of yield and water use efficiency of crops, vegetables and fruits under full, deficit and alternate partial root-zone irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    12. Dagdelen, N. & Basal, H. & YIlmaz, E. & Gürbüz, T. & Akçay, S., 2009. "Different drip irrigation regimes affect cotton yield, water use efficiency and fiber quality in western Turkey," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 111-120, January.
    13. Burak, Selmin & Samanlioglu, Funda & Ülker, Duygu, 2022. "Evaluation of irrigation methods in Söke Plain with HF-AHP-PROMETHEE II hybrid MCDM method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    14. Shareef, Muhammad & Gui, Dongwei & Zeng, Fanjiang & Waqas, Muhammad & Zhang, Bo & Iqbal, Hassan, 2018. "Water productivity, growth, and physiological assessment of deficit irrigated cotton on hyperarid desert-oases in northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1-10.
    15. Yu, Liuyang & Zhao, Xining & Gao, Xiaodong & Siddique, Kadambot H.M., 2020. "Improving/maintaining water-use efficiency and yield of wheat by deficit irrigation: A global meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    16. Amanda M. Nelson & Nicolas E. Quintana Ashwell & Christopher D. Delhom & Drew M. Gholson, 2022. "Leveraging Big Data to Preserve the Mississippi River Valley Alluvial Aquifer: A Blueprint for the National Center for Alluvial Aquifer Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Blessing Masasi & Saleh Taghvaeian & Randy Boman & Sumon Datta, 2019. "Impacts of Irrigation Termination Date on Cotton Yield and Irrigation Requirement," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    18. Fan, Yubing & Wang, Chenggang & Nan, Zhibiao, 2018. "Determining water use efficiency of wheat and cotton: A meta-regression analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 48-60.
    19. Thind, H.S. & Aujla, M.S. & Buttar, G.S., 2008. "Response of cotton to various levels of nitrogen and water applied to normal and paired sown cotton under drip irrigation in relation to check-basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 25-34, January.
    20. Wang, Han & Xiang, Youzhen & Zhang, Fucang & Tang, Zijun & Guo, Jinjin & Zhang, Xueyan & Hou, Xianghao & Wang, Haidong & Cheng, Minghui & Li, Zhijun, 2022. "Responses of yield, quality and water-nitrogen use efficiency of greenhouse sweet pepper to different drip fertigation regimes in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:98:y:2011:i:4:p:632-638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.