IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v95y2008i5p527-538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of wetland and agriculture drainage as sources of biochemical oxygen demand to the San Joaquin River, California

Author

Listed:
  • Stringfellow, William T.
  • Hanlon, Jeremy S.
  • Borglin, Sharon E.
  • Quinn, Nigel W.T.

Abstract

For many years, the San Joaquin River (SJR) has had low dissolved oxygen conditions intermittently during the late summer and early fall. The low dissolved oxygen conditions are impacting critical fish habitat and the SJR is being regulated under a state of California remediation plan that includes the development of a total maximum daily load (TMDL) allocation for oxygen demanding substances. In support of the development of a scientific TMDL allocation, studies are being conducted to characterize water quality in the many tributaries of the SJR. This study identified the sources of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in two western tributaries of the SJR, Mud Slough and Salt Slough, and measured the loads of BOD, algae, and ammonia entering the SJR from wetland and agricultural sources. Mud and Salt Sloughs drain the Grassland Watershed. The watershed contains seasonal wetlands, irrigated farmland, and other agricultural lands. This drainage is under close regulatory scrutiny, because it produces a majority of the selenium and boron entering the SJR. In this study, wetland and irrigated agricultural drainage were sampled separately and a comparison was made to determine differences in water quality. In addition, water entering the study area was compared to water exiting the study area to determine the effect of water use in the region on water quality. This study demonstrated that BOD loads from the Grassland Watershed to the SJR were proportional to flow during June-October, the most critical time for dissolved oxygen deficits in the lower SJR. This indicates that Mud and Salt Sloughs are not producing more BOD than other tributaries in the region that are not under close regulatory scrutiny. The BOD concentration of wetland drainage is higher than that of agricultural drainage, but the higher agricultural drainage flows result in a higher mass loading of BOD. Wetland flooding and irrigation of crops both had a negative impact on water quality. Algal growth was identified as the major source of BOD in agricultural drainage and locations where BOD control could potentially be implemented were identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Stringfellow, William T. & Hanlon, Jeremy S. & Borglin, Sharon E. & Quinn, Nigel W.T., 2008. "Comparison of wetland and agriculture drainage as sources of biochemical oxygen demand to the San Joaquin River, California," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(5), pages 527-538, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:95:y:2008:i:5:p:527-538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378-3774(07)00318-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wesstrom, Ingrid & Messing, Ingmar & Linner, Harry & Lindstrom, Jan, 2001. "Controlled drainage -- effects on drain outflow and water quality," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 85-100, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruoyu Wang & Huajin Chen & Yuzhou Luo & Patrick Moran & Michael Grieneisen & Minghua Zhang, 2019. "Nitrate Runoff Contributing from the Agriculturally Intensive San Joaquin River Watershed to Bay-Delta in California," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lavaire, Tito & Gentry, Lowell E. & David, Mark B. & Cooke, Richard A., 2017. "Fate of water and nitrate using drainage water management on tile systems in east-central Illinois," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 218-228.
    2. Qadir, M. & Boers, Th. M. & Schubert, S. & Ghafoor, A. & Murtaza, G., 2003. "Agricultural water management in water-starved countries: challenges and opportunities," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 165-185, October.
    3. Negm, L.M. & Youssef, M.A. & Chescheir, G.M. & Skaggs, R.W., 2016. "DRAINMOD-based tools for quantifying reductions in annual drainage flow and nitrate losses resulting from drainage water management on croplands in eastern North Carolina," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 86-100.
    4. King, K.W. & Hanrahan, B.R. & Stinner, J. & Shedekar, V.S., 2022. "Field scale discharge and water quality response, to drainage water management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    5. Bohne, B. & Storchenegger, I.J. & Widmoser, P., 2012. "An easy to use calculation method for weir operations in controlled drainage systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 46-53.
    6. Bjerkholt, Jarle T. & Kværner, Jens & Jenssen, Petter D. & Briseid, Tormod, 2019. "Mitigating particle and nutrient losses via subsurface agricultural drainage using lightweight aggregates," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 1004-1015.
    7. Tolomio, Massimo & Borin, Maurizio, 2019. "Controlled drainage and crop production in a long-term experiment in North-Eastern Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 21-29.
    8. Kröger, R. & Cooper, C.M. & Moore, M.T., 2008. "A preliminary study of an alternative controlled drainage strategy in surface drainage ditches: Low-grade weirs," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(6), pages 678-684, June.
    9. Wesstrom, Ingrid & Messing, Ingmar, 2007. "Effects of controlled drainage on N and P losses and N dynamics in a loamy sand with spring crops," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 229-240, February.
    10. Tolomio, Massimo & Borin, Maurizio, 2018. "Water table management to save water and reduce nutrient losses from agricultural fields: 6 years of experience in North-Eastern Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 1-10.
    11. Yanmei Yu & Junzeng Xu & Pingcang Zhang & Yan Meng & Yujiang Xiong, 2021. "Controlled Irrigation and Drainage Reduce Rainfall Runoff and Nitrogen Loss in Paddy Fields," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Mariusz Sojka & Michał Kozłowski & Rafał Stasik & Michał Napierała & Barbara Kęsicka & Rafał Wróżyński & Joanna Jaskuła & Daniel Liberacki & Jerzy Bykowski, 2019. "Sustainable Water Management in Agriculture—The Impact of Drainage Water Management on Groundwater Table Dynamics and Subsurface Outflow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Williams, M.R. & King, K.W. & Fausey, N.R., 2015. "Drainage water management effects on tile discharge and water quality," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 43-51.
    14. Deichmann, Majken M. & Andersen, Mathias N. & Thomsen, Ingrid K. & Børgesen, Christen D., 2019. "Impacts of controlled drainage during winter on the physiology and yield of winter wheat in Denmark," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 118-126.
    15. Littlejohn, K.A. & Poganski, B.H. & Kröger, R. & Ramirez-Avila, J.J., 2014. "Effectiveness of low-grade weirs for nutrient removal in an agricultural landscape in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 79-86.
    16. Yasir Abduljaleel & Ahmed Awad & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Ali Salem & Abdelazim Negm & Mohamed Elsayed Gabr, 2023. "Assessment of Subsurface Drainage Strategies Using DRAINMOD Model for Sustainable Agriculture: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Wang, Zhiyu & Shao, Guangcheng & Lu, Jia & Zhang, Kun & Gao, Yang & Ding, Jihui, 2020. "Effects of controlled drainage on crop yield, drainage water quantity and quality: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    18. Barbara Kęsicka & Rafał Stasik & Michał Kozłowski & Adam Choryński, 2023. "Is Controlled Drainage of Agricultural Land a Common Used Practice?—A Bibliographic Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:95:y:2008:i:5:p:527-538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.