IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v313y2025ics037837742500215x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the LI-710 evapotranspiration sensor in comparison to full eddy covariance for monitoring energy fluxes in perennial and annual crops

Author

Listed:
  • Peddinti, Srinivasa Rao
  • Kisekka, Isaya

Abstract

Reliable and low-cost sensors for measuring evapotranspiration (ET) and associated energy fluxes are crucial for hydrologic monitoring and water management; however, conventional methods such as eddy covariance (EC) can be prohibitively expensive and complex. This study evaluates the performance of the LI-710 sensor across perennial (citrus, almond, pistachio) and annual crops (processing tomatoes) by comparing daily ET, sensible heat flux (H), and latent heat flux (LE) measurements with those from full EC systems under California’s Central Valley climatic conditions. Measurements from the LI-710 were corrected for unclosed energy balance using an energy-balance-residual (EBR) method that incorporates independent net radiation and soil heat flux data. Uncorrected LI-710 fluxes exhibited a consistent underestimation, as reflected in low or negative Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values. For ET, processing tomato NSE increased from 0.35 to 0.94 with EBR correction, citrus from 0.32 to 0.73, almond from −2.09 to 0.79, and pistachio from 0.72 to 0.95. H improved similarly (processing tomato: 0.86–0.97; citrus: 0.13–0.67; almond: −0.35 to 0.75; pistachio: 0.20–0.85), while LE accuracy rose from 0.44 to 0.95 in processing tomatoes, −0.10 to 0.77 in citrus, −1.51 to 0.76 in almonds, and 0.71–0.93 in pistachios. Corresponding reductions in root mean square error (RMSE) confirmed that EBR-corrected LI-710 measurements closely aligned with EC observations, effectively capturing seasonal peaks and phenological transitions. These results highlight the LI-710 sensor’s potential as a lower-cost, user-friendly alternative to full EC systems for routine flux monitoring, provided that energy-balance adjustments are implemented. Such an approach can support precision irrigation and sustainable water management, particularly in regions facing increasing pressures on freshwater resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Peddinti, Srinivasa Rao & Kisekka, Isaya, 2025. "Evaluation of the LI-710 evapotranspiration sensor in comparison to full eddy covariance for monitoring energy fluxes in perennial and annual crops," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:313:y:2025:i:c:s037837742500215x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837742500215X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:313:y:2025:i:c:s037837742500215x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.