IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v263y2022ics0378377421006867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring irrigation dynamics in paddy fields using spatiotemporal fusion of Sentinel-2 and MODIS

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao, Dongyang
  • Niu, Haipeng
  • Guo, Fuchen
  • Zhao, Suxia
  • Fan, Liangxin

Abstract

Rapid and accurate monitoring of irrigation dynamics in paddy fields (the start, end, duration and irrigation peak, etc.) at field scales is crucial to the fine management of agricultural water resources, especially in typical areas with water shortages. However, there is still a lack of sufficient research to depict irrigation dynamics in paddy fields at high temporal and spatial levels. To this end, this study fused Sentinel-2 and MODIS images to map the spatio-temporal dynamics of irrigation events in paddy fields. A popular spatiotemporal fusion algorithm (enhanced spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model, ESTARFM) was used to generate 25 high-spatial resolution (10 m) remote sensing images based on 9 Sentinel-2 images and 24 MODIS images. Random forest algorithm was used to extract the spatial distribution of irrigated paddy fields. Water body index and vegetation index were employed to identify the start, end and duration of irrigation in paddy fields. Penman-Monteith model was used to estimate water surplus and deficit of irrigation during the critical irrigation period with daily observation data from meteorological stations. This study was carried out in rice-growing areas in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River in China. The results indicated that the spatial distribution difference of irrigation events in paddy fields with the shortest 3-day interval could be monitored in collaboration with Sentinel-2 and MODIS images. The start, end, and duration of irrigation in paddy fields presented significant spatial differences at field scales. A large amount of water from groundwater and Yellow River was needed, because the total water shortage of irrigation in paddy fields in the study area was about 80.79% of the total water demand. In addition, paddy fields with higher water demand were more concentrated spatially, as were paddy fields with lower water demand. The feasibility of spatiotemporal fusion of multi-source remote sensing data makes it possible to continuously monitor irrigation dynamics in paddy fields on high spatial resolution scales, which is conducive to the construction of spatiotemporal database and big data platform of agricultural irrigation information. This would not only help in promoting the high-quality development of agricultural water resources management but also alleviating the contradiction of regional water resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao, Dongyang & Niu, Haipeng & Guo, Fuchen & Zhao, Suxia & Fan, Liangxin, 2022. "Monitoring irrigation dynamics in paddy fields using spatiotemporal fusion of Sentinel-2 and MODIS," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:263:y:2022:i:c:s0378377421006867
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421006867
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107409?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tyagi, N. K. & Sharma, D. K. & Luthra, S. K., 2000. "Determination of evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of rice and sunflower with lysimeter," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 41-54, June.
    2. Cesari de Maria, Sandra & Rienzner, Michele & Facchi, Arianna & Chiaradia, Enrico Antonio & Romani, Marco & Gandolfi, Claudio, 2016. "Water balance implications of switching from continuous submergence to flush irrigation in a rice-growing district," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 108-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brinkhoff, James & Houborg, Rasmus & Dunn, Brian W., 2022. "Rice ponding date detection in Australia using Sentinel-2 and Planet Fusion imagery," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Ya & Xu, Xu & Sun, Chen & Ding, Shibo & Huo, Zailin & Huang, Guanhua, 2021. "Parameterization and modeling of paddy rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica) growth and water use in cold regions: Yield and water-saving analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    2. Jovanovic, N. & Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Pôças, I. & Cantore, V. & Todorovic, M., 2020. "A review of strategies, methods and technologies to reduce non-beneficial consumptive water use on farms considering the FAO56 methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Liu, Yujie & Luo, Yi, 2010. "A consolidated evaluation of the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient approach using the lysimeter data in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 31-40, January.
    4. Choudhury, B.U. & Singh, Anil Kumar & Pradhan, S., 2013. "Estimation of crop coefficients of dry-seeded irrigated rice–wheat rotation on raised beds by field water balance method in the Indo-Gangetic plains, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 20-31.
    5. Lv, Yuping & Xu, Junzeng & Yang, Shihong & Liu, Xiaoyin & Zhang, Jiangang & Wang, Yijiang, 2018. "Inter-seasonal and cross-treatment variability in single-crop coefficients for rice evapotranspiration estimation and their validation under drying-wetting cycle conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 154-161.
    6. Meysam ABEDINPOUR, 2015. "Evaluation of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients of maize using weighing lysimeter," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 99-104.
    7. Alam, Mohammad Faiz & Pavelic, Paul, 2020. "Underground Transfer of Floods for Irrigation (UTFI): exploring potential at the global scale," IWMI Research Reports H050008, International Water Management Institute.
    8. Benli, Bogachan & Kodal, Suleyman & Ilbeyi, Adem & Ustun, Haluk, 2006. "Determination of evapotranspiration and basal crop coefficient of alfalfa with a weighing lysimeter," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 358-370, March.
    9. Qiu, Rangjian & Liu, Chunwei & Cui, Ningbo & Wu, Youjie & Wang, Zhenchang & Li, Gen, 2019. "Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified Priestley-Taylor model in a rice-wheat rotation system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Hunsaker, D.J. & López-Urrea, R. & Mohammadi Shad, Z., 2021. "Standard single and basal crop coefficients for field crops. Updates and advances to the FAO56 crop water requirements method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    11. Vu, Son Hong & Watanabe, Hirozumi & Takagi, Kazuhiro, 2005. "Application of FAO-56 for evaluating evapotranspiration in simulation of pollutant runoff from paddy rice field in Japan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 195-210, August.
    12. Sánchez, J.M. & López-Urrea, R. & Rubio, E. & González-Piqueras, J. & Caselles, V., 2014. "Assessing crop coefficients of sunflower and canola using two-source energy balance and thermal radiometry," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 23-29.
    13. Sharmiladevi, R. & Ravikumar, V., 2021. "Simulation of nitrogen fertigation schedule for drip irrigated paddy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    14. Xu, Baoli & Shao, Dongguo & Tan, Xuezhi & Yang, Xia & Gu, Wenquan & Li, Haoxin, 2017. "Evaluation of soil water percolation under different irrigation practices, antecedent moisture and groundwater depths in paddy fields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 149-158.
    15. Masseroni, Daniele & Moller, Peter & Tyrell, Reece & Romani, Marco & Lasagna, Alberto & Sali, Guido & Facchi, Arianna & Gandolfi, Claudio, 2018. "Evaluating performances of the first automatic system for paddy irrigation in Europe," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 58-69.
    16. Singh, Ajay & Krause, Peter & Panda, Sudhindra N. & Flugel, Wolfgang-Albert, 2010. "Rising water table: A threat to sustainable agriculture in an irrigated semi-arid region of Haryana, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(10), pages 1443-1451, October.
    17. Xiang, Keyu & Li, Yi & Horton, Robert & Feng, Hao, 2020. "Similarity and difference of potential evapotranspiration and reference crop evapotranspiration – a review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    18. Li, Yu-Lin & Cui, Jian-Yuan & Zhang, Tong-Hui & Zhao, Ha-Lin, 2003. "Measurement of evapotranspiration of irrigated spring wheat and maize in a semi-arid region of north China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 1-12, June.
    19. Tyagi, N.K. & Agrawal, A. & Sakthivadivel, R. & Ambast, S.K., 2005. "Water management decisions on small farms under scarce canal water supply: A case study from NW India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 77(1-3), pages 180-195, August.
    20. Tan, Xuezhi & Shao, Dongguo & Gu, Wenquan & Liu, Huanhuan, 2015. "Field analysis of water and nitrogen fate in lowland paddy fields under different water managements using HYDRUS-1D," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 67-80.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:263:y:2022:i:c:s0378377421006867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.