IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v170y2019icp19-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beef production simulation of nitrate and lipid supplements for pasture and rangeland fed enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • McPhee, Malcolm J.
  • Evered, Mark
  • Andrews, Todd
  • Pacheco, David
  • Dougherty, Holland C.
  • Ingham, Aaron B.
  • Harden, Steven
  • Crean, Jason
  • Roche, Leslie
  • Eastburn, Danny J.
  • Oltjen, James W.
  • Hutton Oddy, V.
  • Kebreab, Ermias
  • Nolan, John V.
  • Hegarty, Roger S.

Abstract

Long-term effects of dietary supplements on productivity, economics, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 2 beef enterprises were simulated, using AusBeef integrated with AusFarm®, across 30 years: Enterprise 1. Angus steers (1.5 head/ha) in New South Wales, Australia, grazing for 238 days/year, and Enterprise 2. British x Charolais steers (1.0 head/ha) in California, USA, grazing for 148 days/year. Simulation effects of 3 supplements with potential to reduce enteric methane (CH4) emissions were evaluated: (1) nitrate (NO3¯), (2) lipid, and (3) NO3¯ + lipid. All supplementation effects were evaluated against a baseline simulation (i.e., no supplement). Results on beef production, rumen products, GHG emissions, and enterprise gross margins are reported. Simulations indicated that supplementing steers with lipid alone relative to the baseline in Enterprises 1 and 2: increased final live weight (LW) by 68 and 25 kg, decreased emissions intensity (EI) by 69 and 49 g CH4/kg live weight gain (LWG), and decreased total GHG by 0.08 and 0.04 t CO2-e/ha/year, respectively. Supplementing steers with NO3¯ + lipid relative to the baseline: increased final LW by 70 and 30 kg, decreased EI by 89 and 77 g CH4/kg LWG, and decreased total GHG by 0.27 and 0.12 t CO2-e/ha/year for Enterprises 1 and 2 respectively. The most profitable mitigation strategy, across all years, for Enterprise 1 was the lipid supplement with a median gross margin of $AUD753/ha and for Enterprise 2 was the NO3¯ + lipid supplement with a median gross margin of $AUD224/ha. The NO3¯ supplement alone was the least preferred option across both enterprises, consistently delivering lower returns than other options across the entire probability range. The results indicate the potential economic benefit of lipid supplementation, either alone or in combination with NO3¯, as GHG mitigation strategies that increase profitability and inhibit methanogenesis for beef production across diverse environments.

Suggested Citation

  • McPhee, Malcolm J. & Evered, Mark & Andrews, Todd & Pacheco, David & Dougherty, Holland C. & Ingham, Aaron B. & Harden, Steven & Crean, Jason & Roche, Leslie & Eastburn, Danny J. & Oltjen, James W. & , 2019. "Beef production simulation of nitrate and lipid supplements for pasture and rangeland fed enterprises," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 19-27.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:170:y:2019:i:c:p:19-27
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.12.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X18308916
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.12.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moore, A. D. & Donnelly, J. R. & Freer, M., 1997. "GRAZPLAN: Decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises. III. Pasture growth and soil moisture submodels, and the GrassGro DSS," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 535-582, December.
    2. Murphy, Brian & Crosson, Paul & Kelly, Alan K. & Prendiville, Robert, 2017. "An economic and greenhouse gas emissions evaluation of pasture-based dairy calf-to-beef production systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 124-132.
    3. Alcock, Douglas J. & Harrison, Matthew T. & Rawnsley, Richard P. & Eckard, Richard J., 2015. "Can animal genetics and flock management be used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions but also maintain productivity of wool-producing enterprises?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 25-34.
    4. Moore, A.D. & Holzworth, D.P. & Herrmann, N.I. & Huth, N.I. & Robertson, M.J., 2007. "The Common Modelling Protocol: A hierarchical framework for simulation of agricultural and environmental systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 95(1-3), pages 37-48, December.
    5. Alemu, Aklilu W. & Amiro, Brian D. & Bittman, Shabtai & MacDonald, Douglas & Ominski, Kim H., 2017. "Greenhouse gas emission of Canadian cow-calf operations: A whole-farm assessment of 295 farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 73-83.
    6. Harrison, Matthew T. & Jackson, Tom & Cullen, Brendan R. & Rawnsley, Richard P. & Ho, Christie & Cummins, Leo & Eckard, Richard J., 2014. "Increasing ewe genetic fecundity improves whole-farm production and reduces greenhouse gas emissions intensities," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 23-33.
    7. Freer, M. & Moore, A. D. & Donnelly, J. R., 1997. "GRAZPLAN: Decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises--II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 77-126, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moore, A.D. & Robertson, M.J. & Routley, R., 2011. "Evaluation of the water use efficiency of alternative farm practices at a range of spatial and temporal scales: A conceptual framework and a modelling approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 162-174, February.
    2. Alcock, Douglas J. & Harrison, Matthew T. & Rawnsley, Richard P. & Eckard, Richard J., 2015. "Can animal genetics and flock management be used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions but also maintain productivity of wool-producing enterprises?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 25-34.
    3. Harrison, Matthew T. & McSweeney, Chris & Tomkins, Nigel W. & Eckard, Richard J., 2015. "Improving greenhouse gas emissions intensities of subtropical and tropical beef farming systems using Leucaena leucocephala," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 138-146.
    4. Kaini, S. & Harrison, M. T. & Gardner, T. & Nepal, Santosh & Sharma, A. K., 2022. "The impacts of climate change on the irrigation water demand, grain yield, and biomass yield of wheat crop in Nepal," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 1-14(17):27.
    5. McPhee, Malcolm J. & Edwards, Clare & Meckiff, Jim & Ballie, Neil & Schneider, Derek & Arnott, Paul & Cowie, Annette l. & Savage, Darryl & Lamb, David & Guppy, Chris & McCorkell, Bruce E. & Hegarty, R, 2011. "Estimating on-farm methane emissions for sheep production on the Northern Tablelands: establishment of demonstration site," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 7(2), pages 1-10, February.
    6. Rebecca Darbyshire & Jason Crean & Michael Cashen & Muhuddin Rajin Anwar & Kim M Broadfoot & Marja Simpson & David H Cobon & Christa Pudmenzky & Louis Kouadio & Shreevatsa Kodur, 2020. "Insights into the value of seasonal climate forecasts to agriculture," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1034-1058, October.
    7. Donnelly, J. R. & Freer, M. & Salmon, L. & Moore, A. D. & Simpson, R. J. & Dove, H. & Bolger, T. P., 2002. "Evolution of the GRAZPLAN decision support tools and adoption by the grazing industry in temperate Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 115-139, October.
    8. Perillat, B. J. & Brown, W. J. & Cohen, R. D. H., 2004. "A risk efficiency analysis of backgrounding and finishing steers on pasture in Saskatchewan, Canada," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 213-233, June.
    9. Moore, A.D. & Holzworth, D.P. & Herrmann, N.I. & Huth, N.I. & Robertson, M.J., 2007. "The Common Modelling Protocol: A hierarchical framework for simulation of agricultural and environmental systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 95(1-3), pages 37-48, December.
    10. Ghahramani, Afshin & Moore, Andrew D., 2015. "Systemic adaptations to climate change in southern Australian grasslands and livestock: Production, profitability, methane emission and ecosystem function," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 158-166.
    11. Luedeling, Eike & Smethurst, Philip J. & Baudron, Frédéric & Bayala, Jules & Huth, Neil I. & van Noordwijk, Meine & Ong, Chin K. & Mulia, Rachmat & Lusiana, Betha & Muthuri, Catherine & Sinclair, Ferg, 2016. "Field-scale modeling of tree–crop interactions: Challenges and development needs," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 51-69.
    12. Ara, Iffat & Turner, Lydia & Harrison, Matthew Tom & Monjardino, Marta & deVoil, Peter & Rodriguez, Daniel, 2021. "Application, adoption and opportunities for improving decision support systems in irrigated agriculture: A review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    13. Alford, Andrew R. & Griffith, Garry R. & Cacho, Oscar J., 2003. "A Northern Tablelands Whole-Farm Linear Program for Economic Evaluation of New Technologies at the Farm-Level," Research Reports 28010, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    14. Thomas, Dean T. & Flohr, Bonnie M. & Monjardino, Marta & Loi, Angelo & Llewellyn, Rick S. & Lawes, Roger A. & Norman, Hayley C., 2021. "Selecting higher nutritive value annual pasture legumes increases the profitability of sheep production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    15. Donnelly, J. R. & Moore, A. D. & Freer, M., 1997. "GRAZPLAN: Decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises--I. Overview of the GRAZPLAN project, and a description of the MetAccess and LambAlive DSS," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 57-76, May.
    16. McCown, R. L., 2002. "Changing systems for supporting farmers' decisions: problems, paradigms, and prospects," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 179-220, October.
    17. Thamo, Tas & Addai, Donkor & Kragt, Marit E. & Kingwell, Ross S. & Pannell, David J. & Robertson, Michael J., 2019. "Climate change reduces the mitigation obtainable from sequestration in an Australian farming system," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(4), October.
    18. Nasca, J.A. & Feldkamp, C.R. & Arroquy, J.I. & Colombatto, D., 2015. "Efficiency and stability in subtropical beef cattle grazing systems in the northwest of Argentina," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 85-96.
    19. McGee, M. & Lenehan, C. & Crosson, P. & O'Riordan, E.G. & Kelly, A.K. & Moran, L. & Moloney, A.P., 2022. "Performance, meat quality, profitability, and greenhouse gas emissions of suckler bulls from pasture-based compared to an indoor high-concentrate weanling-to-beef finishing system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    20. Brown, Peter D. & Cochrane, Thomas A. & Krom, Thomas D., 2010. "Optimal on-farm irrigation scheduling with a seasonal water limit using simulated annealing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(6), pages 892-900, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:170:y:2019:i:c:p:19-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.