IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/advacc/v31y2015i1p91-95.html

Auditor scrutiny of unaudited client disclosure outlets: Recognized vs. disclosed financial statement items also appearing in the MD&A

Author

Listed:
  • Wheeler, Stephen
  • Cereola, Sandra J.

Abstract

Securities and Exchange Commission standards require disclosure of material non-recurring or unusual items affecting earnings in the Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) section of annual 10Ks. Extraordinary items and LIFO liquidations represent unusual and non-recurring items. When material, both issues theoretically should be highlighted in management's discussion of current operations in the MD&A. Extraordinary items are recognized on the face of the income statement, while LIFO liquidations are disclosed in the footnotes. Libby, Nelson, and Hunton (2006) found that auditors permit more misstatement in disclosed, as opposed to recognized, amounts in annual reports. In this paper we test empirically whether these audit tendencies also apply in secondary disclosure venues such as the MD&A. For public companies reporting between 2001 and 2011, significantly higher MD&A disclosure rates are noted for recognized items, as opposed to disclosed items. Also, contrary to what Attribution Theory would predict, our results did not show a significant tendency to disclose negative-income-effect extraordinary items more often in the MD&A.

Suggested Citation

  • Wheeler, Stephen & Cereola, Sandra J., 2015. "Auditor scrutiny of unaudited client disclosure outlets: Recognized vs. disclosed financial statement items also appearing in the MD&A," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 91-95.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:advacc:v:31:y:2015:i:1:p:91-95
    DOI: 10.1016/j.adiac.2015.03.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882611015000103
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.adiac.2015.03.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaplan, Steven E. & Reckers, Philip M. J. & Roark, Stephen J., 1988. "An attribution theory analysis of tax evasion related judgments," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 371-379, June.
    2. Robert Libby & Mark W. Nelson & James E. Hunton, 2006. "Retracted: Recognition v. Disclosure, Auditor Tolerance for Misstatement, and the Reliability of Stock‐Compensation and Lease Information," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(3), pages 533-560, June.
    3. Birnberg, Jacob G. & Frieze, Irene Hanson & Shields, Michael D., 1977. "The role of attribution theory in control systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 189-200, June.
    4. Arrington, Ce & Bailey, Cd & Hopwood, Ws, 1985. "An Attribution Analysis Of Responsibility Assessment For Audit Performance," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(1), pages 1-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luigi Mittone, 2002. "Individual styles of tax evasion: an experimental study," CEEL Working Papers 0202, Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    2. Luigi Mittone, 1997. "Subjective versus objective probability: results from seven experiments on fiscal evasion," CEEL Working Papers 9704, Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    3. Emmanuel Kojo Oseifuah, 2025. "Application of the fraud triangle model in mitigating tax evasion in developing countries: a conceptual framework," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 7(2), pages 297-306, April.
    4. Diana Falsetta & Jennifer K. Schafer & George T. Tsakumis, 2024. "How Government Spending Impacts Tax Compliance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(2), pages 513-530, March.
    5. Golden, Joanna & Liu, Xiaotao Kelvin, 2025. "Capitalization of operating leases and the cost of bank loans," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Alderman, Jillian, 2017. "Does auditor gender influence auditor liability? Exploring the impact of the crime congruency effect on jurors' perceptions of auditor negligence," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 75-87.
    7. Gaynor, Lisa Milici & McDaniel, Linda & Yohn, Teri Lombardi, 2011. "Fair value accounting for liabilities: The role of disclosures in unraveling the counterintuitive income statement effect from credit risk changes," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 125-134, April.
    8. Blacconiere, Walter G. & Frederickson, James R. & Johnson, Marilyn F. & Lewis, Melissa F., 2011. "Are voluntary disclosures that disavow the reliability of mandated fair value information informative or opportunistic?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 235-251.
    9. MirHadi Hosseini Kondelaji & Majid Sameti & Hadi Amiri & Rozita Moayedfar, 2016. "Analyzing Determinants of Tax Morale Based on Social Psychology Theory: Case Study of Iran," Iranian Economic Review (IER), Faculty of Economics,University of Tehran.Tehran,Iran, vol. 20(4), pages 579-595, Autumn.
    10. Mitchell Bryce & Muhammad Jahangir Ali & Paul R. Mather, 2021. "Director expectations gap and hindsight bias," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(2), pages 2965-2996, June.
    11. Radcliffe, Vaughan S. & Spence, Crawford & Stein, Mitchell & Wilkinson, Brett, 2018. "Professional repositioning during times of institutional change: The case of tax practitioners and changing moral boundaries," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 45-59.
    12. Juha Mäki & Antonio Somoza-Lopez & Stefan Sundgren, 2016. "Ownership Structure and Accounting Method Choice: A Study of European Real Estate Companies," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Shaw, Kenneth W., 2008. "Revised pension rules and the cost of debt," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 3-25.
    14. Deena Azriana Wan Mohd Azmi & Seri Ayu Masuri Md Daud, 2024. "Reconceptualizing Tax Compliance Behavior: A Theoretical Matrix Approach," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 13(1), pages 1-67, February.
    15. Sandgren, Mattias & Uman, Timur & Nordqvist, Mattias, 2024. "The role of the strategic apex in shaping the disclosure strategy: A family firm in crisis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(3).
    16. Diana Falsetta & Brian C. Spilker, 2026. "Psychological Reactance Theory and Tax Evasion Intentions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 203(3), pages 593-610, January.
    17. Kothari, S.P. & Ramanna, Karthik & Skinner, Douglas J., 2010. "Implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 246-286, December.
    18. Blanthorne, Cindy & Kaplan, Steven, 2008. "An egocentric model of the relations among the opportunity to underreport, social norms, ethical beliefs, and underreporting behavior," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 684-703.
    19. Fried, Abraham N. & Davis-Friday, Paquita Y., 2013. "Economic consequences of mandatory GAAP changes: The case of SFAS No. 158," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 186-194.
    20. Hartmann, Frank & Slapnicar, Sergeja, 2009. "How formal performance evaluation affects trust between superior and subordinate managers," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 722-737, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:advacc:v:31:y:2015:i:1:p:91-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/advances-in-accounting/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.