IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecr/col070/10257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International competitiveness: agreed goal, hard task

Author

Listed:
  • Fajnzylber, Fernando

Abstract

Intenta caracterizar esquematicamente la situacion imperante en los paises avanzados, en relacion con la reestructuracion productiva e incorporacion de progreso tecnico. Para este efecto, examina los diferentes factores que explican el proceso, poniendo enfasis en el tema de la competitividad internacional.

Suggested Citation

  • Fajnzylber, Fernando, 1988. "International competitiveness: agreed goal, hard task," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecr:col070:10257
    Note: Includes bibliography
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/10257
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pfaller, Alfred, 1987. "Are the western welfare states still competitive?," Intereconomics – Review of European Economic Policy (1966 - 1988), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 22(3), pages 112-119.
    2. Denison, Edward F, 1980. "The Contribution of Capital to Economic Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(2), pages 220-224, May.
    3. Rosenberg, Nathan & Frischtak, Claudio R, 1984. "Technological Innovation and Long Waves," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(1), pages 7-24, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abbas Mohammed Hussein & Mohammed Mustafa Ahmed & Mohamed Yahya Mahmoud Khudari, 2021. "The Impact of Strategic Planning in the University’s Competitiveness According to NIAS," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 10, September.
    2. Seyyed Ali Delbari & Siew Imm Ng & Yuhanis Abdul Aziz & Jo Ann Ho, 2015. "Measuring the influence and impact of competitiveness research: a Web of Science approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 773-788, November.
    3. Haldenwang, Christian von, 2005. "Systemic governance and development in Latin America," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    4. Alina Petronela Alexoaei, 2020. "The relevance of national competitiveness for the entrepreneurial environment," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 23(77), pages 64-76, September.
    5. Yoshimichi Murakami & Nobuaki Hamaguchi, 2021. "Peripherality, income inequality, and economic development in Latin American countries," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 133-148, April.
    6. Visser, H., 1993. "The exchange rate as an export-stimulation mechanism," Serie Research Memoranda 0037, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    7. Nassif, André, 2008. "The structure and competitiveness of the Brazilian capital goods industry," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    8. Helena Maria Martins Lastres, 2017. "Development, innovation, sustainability and policies: Chris Freeman's legacy," Globelics Working Paper Series 2017-02, Globelics - Global Network for Economics of Learning, Innovation, and Competence Building Systems, Aalborg University, Department of Business and Management.
    9. Azzopardi, Ernest & Nash, Robert, 2013. "A critical evaluation of importance–performance analysis," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 222-233.
    10. Thomas Poufinas & George Galanos & Charalampos Agiropoulos, 2021. "The Impact of Competitiveness on the Shadow Economy," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 27(1), pages 29-46, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Knell & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Tools and concepts for understanding disruptive technological change after Schumpeter," Jena Economics Research Papers 2022-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    2. Nieto-Carrillo, Ernesto & Carreira, Carlos & Teixeira, Paulino, 2024. "Industrial dynamics in the ICT technological paradigm: The case of Portugal, 1986–2018," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 155-170.
    3. Gustav Ranis & Frances Stewart, 2000. "Strategies for Success in Human Development," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 49-69.
    4. Darío Vázquez, 2020. "Variety patterns in defense and health technological systems: evidence from international trade data," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 949-988, September.
    5. Enrico Santarelli & Jacopo Staccioli & Marco Vivarelli, 2023. "Automation and related technologies: a mapping of the new knowledge base," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 779-813, April.
    6. Maria Rosa Trovato, 2020. "Human Capital Approach in the Economic Assessment of Interventions for the Reduction of Seismic Vulnerability in Historic Centres," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-33, September.
    7. Levy, Daniel, 1994. "Output, Capital, and Labor in the Short, and Long-Run," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 60(4), pages 946-960.
    8. M. Ishaq Nadiri, 1993. "Innovations and Technological Spillovers," NBER Working Papers 4423, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Mirjana cizmovic & Jelena Jankovic & Milenko Popovic, 2015. "Growth Anatomy of Croatian Economy," Ekonomija Economics, Rifin d.o.o., vol. 22(1), pages 159-216.
    10. Aziz, Nusrate & Ahmad, Ahmad H., 2018. "Institutions and Economic Growth: Does Income Level Matter?," MPRA Paper 83684, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Guo, Yanjun & Liu, Yansui & Li, Ruotong & Li, Yurui & Wang, Jieyong, 2024. "TIC-driven sustainable land use mode in the Loess Plateau: A case study of gully land consolidation project in Yan'an City, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    12. Pedro Bação & Marta Simões, 2020. "Is the Welfare State Relevant for Economic Growth? Evidence for Portugal," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 62(3), pages 494-520, September.
    13. Chris Freeman, 2003. "A Schumpeterian Renaissance?," SPRU Working Paper Series 102, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    14. Castaldi, C. & Nuvolari, A., 2003. "Technological Revolutions and Economic Growth:The �Age of Steam� Reconsidered," Working Papers 03.25, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    15. Łukasz Jabłoński, 2021. "Ewolucja podejść do kapitału ludzkiego w naukach ekonomicznych," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 2, pages 91-120.
    16. GianPaolo Mariutti, 2007. "Something new under the sun. The role of new technologies in a growing economy," Working Papers 45/2007, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    17. Faïz Gallouj, 1994. "Cycles économiques et innovations de service : à la lumière de la pensée schumpéterienne," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 9(4), pages 169-213.
    18. Ramser, Hans Jürgen, 1985. "Schumpetersche Konzepte in der Analyse des technischen Wandels," Discussion Papers, Series I 203, University of Konstanz, Department of Economics.
    19. Gustav Ranis, 2000. "Strategies for Success in Human Development," Working Papers 808, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    20. K. Renuka Ganegodage & Alicia N. Rambaldi & D. S. Prasada Rao & Kam K. Tang, 2017. "A New Multidimensional Measure of Development: The Role of Technology and Institutions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 65-92, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecr:col070:10257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Biblioteca CEPAL (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eclaccl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.