IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecm/emetrp/v48y1980i2p307-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantity Constrained Demand Functions

Author

Listed:
  • Latham, Roger W

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Latham, Roger W, 1980. "Quantity Constrained Demand Functions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(2), pages 307-313, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:48:y:1980:i:2:p:307-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0012-9682%28198003%2948%3A2%3C307%3AQCDF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-P&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ogawa, Shogo, 2022. "Survey of non-Walrasian disequilibrium economic theory," MPRA Paper 115011, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Siebert, Horst, 1982. "The partitioning of constraints," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 3580, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. John Creedy & Nicolas Hérault & Guyonne Kalb, 2007. "Comparing Welfare Change Measures with Income Change Measures in Behavioural Policy Simulations," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2007n21, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    4. Akio Matsumoto, 1993. "Dynamic complexity in a stochastic rationing model," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 233-259, October.
    5. Peter C. Reiss & Matthew W. White, 2006. "Evaluating Welfare with Nonlinear Prices," NBER Working Papers 12370, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Latham, Roger, 1999. "On the difference between the compensating and equivalent variations due to a change in an exogenously determined commodity," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 135-145, July.
    7. Park, Hoanjae, 1997. "Randall and Stoll's bound in an inverse demand system," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 281-286, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:48:y:1980:i:2:p:307-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.