IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Agrupación Alternativa Para La Evaluación De Las Universidades Públicas Españolas

Listed author(s):
Registered author(s):

    Las universidades están cambiando sus estrategias en función del cumplimiento de sus tres principales misiones: docencia, investigación y transferencia de conocimiento. Esta diferenciación ha propiciado un aumento de la heterogeneidad del sistema universitario español. Sin embargo, a pesar de dicha diferenciación, se continúa evaluando a las universidades en función de su posición jerárquica acorde a rankings definidos, usualmente, con indicadores simples, no respondiendo a la visión multidimensional que caracteriza a la universidad de hoy en día. En este contexto, resulta necesario indagar acerca de una agrupación alternativa para las universidades que responda a la diversidad del sistema. En este trabajo, aplicamos el análisis multidimensional fuzzy cluster para representar de forma más flexible la realidad compleja que caracteriza al sector universitario. El trabajo ha permitido identificar tres grupos de universidades dependiendo del grado de desarrollo de sus tres principales misiones, si bien se observa que algunas universidades están incluidas en dos grupos diferentes al mismo tiempo.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access usually restricted to subscribers. Free on line subscription for universities from low and middle income countries: See

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Euro-American Association of Economic Development in its journal Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies.

    Volume (Year): 12 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eaa:eerese:v:12:y2012:i:3_12
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web: Email:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eaa:eerese:v:12:y2012:i:3_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (M. Carmen Guisan)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.