IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/actaec/y2012i2p83-105.html

The IASB and FASB Convergence Process: Current Developments

Author

Listed:
  • Saher Aqel

    (Alquds University, East Jerusalem, Palestine)

Abstract

The importance of harmonization of accounting standards is now widely accepted all over the world. The increased international movement of investments has strongly forces the harmonization of the various national accounting standards in a uniform financial reporting system accepted worldwide. Recently the Securities and Exchange Commission has agreed to remove the requirement of international firms reporting under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and listed in the U.S to provide reconciliation to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). This recent move of the Securities and Exchange Commission indicates that U.S. financial reporting is likely to converge with IFRS in the near future. The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) are currently working together so as to converge their existing accounting standards into a common set of international accounting standards. The objective of this paper is to discuss the FASB and IASB convergence process by addressing current developments regarding significant topics that were deemed critical to this convergence. The convergence of GAAP and IFRS seems inevitable. Mixed opinions have been voiced about this convergence process. Many have begun to consider obstacles that is possible to lay ahead as well as the possible costs and benefits of such a move to the IFRS .

Suggested Citation

  • Saher Aqel, 2012. "The IASB and FASB Convergence Process: Current Developments," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 2(2), pages 83-105, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2012:i:2:p:83-105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/oeconomica/article/view/1155/1114
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucy Huajing Chen & Heibatollah Sami, 2008. "Trading Volume Reaction to the Earnings Reconciliation from IAS to U. S. GAAP," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 15-53, March.
    2. David Alexander & Eva Jermakowicz, 2006. "A true and fair view of the principles/rules debate," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 42(2), pages 132-164, June.
    3. Benston, George J., 2006. "Fair-value accounting: A cautionary tale from Enron," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 465-484.
    4. Benston, George J., 2008. "The shortcomings of fair-value accounting described in SFAS 157," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 101-114.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William L. Smith & David M. Boje & Kevin D. Melendrez, 2010. "The financial crisis and mark‐to‐market accounting," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 281-303, August.
    2. Russell Craig & Wally Smieliauskas & Joel Amernic, 2014. "Assessing Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Using Expert Accounting Witness Evidence and the Conceptual Framework," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 24(3), pages 200-206, September.
    3. Wally Smieliauskas & Russell Craig & Joel Amernic, 2008. "A Proposal to Replace ‘True and Fair View’ With ‘Acceptable Risk of Material Misstatement’," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 44(3), pages 225-250, September.
    4. Palea, Vera, 2018. "Financial reporting for sustainable development: Critical insights into IFRS implementation in the European Union," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 248-260.
    5. Palea, Vera, 2015. "The political economy of fair value reporting and the governance of the standards-setting process: Critical issues and pitfalls from a continental European union perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 1-15.
    6. Palea, Vera, 2019. "Accounting for Sustainable Finance: Does Fair value Accounting Fit for Long-term Investing in Equity?," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201912, University of Turin.
    7. Aldys Tan & Bikram Chatterjee & Victoria Wise & Mahmud Hossain, 2016. "An Investigation into the Potential Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards in the United States: Implications and Implementation," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(1), pages 45-65, March.
    8. Zhang, Eagle & Andrew, Jane, 2016. "Rethinking China: Discourse, convergence and fair value accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-21.
    9. Andrew van Hulten & Michael Webber, 2010. "Do developing countries need 'good' institutions and policies and deep financial markets to benefit from capital account liberalization?," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 283-319, March.
    10. George J. Benston & Michael Bromwich & Alfred Wagenhofer, 2006. "Principles‐ versus rules‐based accounting standards: the FASB's standard setting strategy," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 42(2), pages 165-188, June.
    11. Paulo Cesar de Melo Mendes & Jorge Katsumi Niyama & Cesar Augusto Tiburcio Silva, 2018. "The Perception of Auditors in the Measurement of Instruments Financial Institutions at Fair Value in Financial Institutions," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 15(4), pages 363-381, July.
    12. Steve Lin & Grace Pownall & Assma Sawani & Changjiang Wang, 2025. "The effect of the FASB-IASB convergence project on the rules- and principles-based nature of US GAAP and IFRS," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 1500-1542, June.
    13. Paweł Mielcarz & Paweł Wnuczak, 2011. "DCF Fair Value Valuation, Excessive Assetes and Hidden Inefficiencies," Contemporary Economics, Vizja University, vol. 5(4), December.
    14. Spence, Crawford & Carter, David, 2011. "Accounting for the General Intellect: Immaterial labour and the social factory," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 304-315.
    15. Lam, Kevin C.K. & Sami, Heibatollah & Yao, Jun & Yao, Yiwei, 2023. "Mandatory IFRS adoption and earnings management: The role of culture," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    16. Guilherme Belloque & Martina K Linnenluecke & Mauricio Marrone & Abhay K Singh & Rui Xue, 2021. "55 years of Abacus: Evolution of Research Streams and Future Research Directions," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(3), pages 593-618, September.
    17. Vighneswara Swamy & Vijayalakshmi, 2012. "Fair value accounting in banking - issues in convergence to IFRS," African Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 270-280.
    18. Hodges, Ron & Mellett, Howard, 2012. "The U.K. private finance initiative: An accounting retrospective," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 235-247.
    19. Moses, Olayinka & Houqe, Muhammad Nurul & van Zijl, Tony, 2018. "What is the economic value of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) information disclosure?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 216-233.
    20. Petrus H. Ferreira & Roman Kräussl & Wayne R. Landsman & Maria Nykyforovych Borysoff & Peter F. Pope, 2019. "Reliability and relevance of fair values: private equity investments and investee fundamentals," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1427-1449, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2012:i:2:p:83-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniela Robu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.