IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwwob/82-20-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Verschärfte Eigenkapitalanforderungen für EU-Staatsanleihen: ein Schritt in Richtung eines stabileren Finanzsystems

Author

Listed:
  • Dorothea Schäfer
  • Dominik Meyland

Abstract

In the wake of the European debt crisis, it has become clear that government bonds may actually be a risky form of investment. The Basel Committee and the Bundesbank have therefore opened an intense debate as to whether banks investing in EU government bonds should be subject to regulatory capital requirements in the future. Currently, banks do not need equity capital when investing in sovereign bonds. Waiving this exemption privilege would result in an additional Tier 1-capital requirement of 3.34 billion euros for the German banks studied here. This represents just under 1.8 percent of available Tier 1-capital. For French banks, the calculated capital requirement is 3.52 billion euros (a good 1.2 percent), while Swedish banks have a requirement of an additional 80.6 million euros (0.14 percent). Raising these funds is not likely to cause any major problems for banks in these countries. It is an entirely different matter for Greek banks, however. The capital requirement in Greece is relatively high at almost 1.8 billion euros or almost nine percent of existing Tier 1-capital. Despite its modest impact on the leverage on banks’ balance sheets, a regulatory obligation to finance investments in EU government bonds with some equity capital would be very welcome. The ratio of equity to total assets would improve, at least slightly, and the reform would probably loosen up the close link between bank risks and sovereign debt in the longer term. Both would help achieve a more stable financial system within Europe. Im Zuge der europäischen Schuldenkrise ist deutlich geworden, dass Staatsanleihen eine durchaus riskante Anlageform sein können. Der Basler Ausschuss und die Bundesbank haben daher eine intensive Diskussion darüber angestoßen, ob Investitionen der Banken in EU-Staatsanleihen in Zukunft mit regulatorischen Eigenkapitalanforderungen belegt werden sollten. Bisher müssen Banken hierfür kein Eigenkapital nachweisen. Würde dieses Freistellungsprivileg aufgehoben, ergibt sich für die untersuchten deutschen Banken ein zusätzlicher Kernkapitalbedarf von 3,34 Milliarden Euro. Das entspricht knapp 1,8 Prozent des vorhandenen Kernkapitals. Bei den französischen Banken beträgt der errechnete Kapitalbedarf 3,52 Milliarden Euro (gut 1,2 Prozent) und die schwedischen Banken haben einen Bedarf von zusätzlich 80,6 Millionen Euro (0,14 Prozent). Die Beschaffung der Mittel dürfte für Banken aus diesen Ländern kaum größere Probleme verursachen. Anders sieht es für die griechischen Banken aus. Der Kapitalbedarf ist hier mit knapp 1,8 Milliarden Euro zusätzlich und damit knapp neun Prozent des existierenden Kernkapitals vergleichsweise hoch. Trotz bescheidener Auswirkungen auf die Hebelung der Bankbilanzen wäre die regulatorische Verpflichtung, Investitionen in EU-Staatsanleihen auch mit Eigenkapital zu finanzieren, zu begrüßen. Das Verhältnis von Eigenmitteln zur Gesamtbilanz würde zumindest leicht verbessert und die Reform auf längere Sicht voraussichtlich die enge Verknüpfung von Bankrisiken und Staatsverschuldung lockern. Beides würde zu einem stabileren europäischen Finanzsystem beitragen.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorothea Schäfer & Dominik Meyland, 2015. "Verschärfte Eigenkapitalanforderungen für EU-Staatsanleihen: ein Schritt in Richtung eines stabileren Finanzsystems," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 82(20), pages 475-485.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:82-20-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.504598.de/15-20-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    bank regulation; bank stress test 2014;

    JEL classification:

    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • H63 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Debt; Debt Management; Sovereign Debt
    • F34 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Lending and Debt Problems
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:82-20-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.