IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Transparenz von Riester-Produkten: theoretische Fundierung und Befunde einer Anbieterbefragung

  • Johannes Leinert
Registered author(s):

    The market for state-sponsored private pension schemes in Germany ("Riester-Rente") is not transparent. This article explains why the problem of asymmetric information, which disadvantages consumers, needs governmental regulation as the problems cannot be resolved by the market. A survey shows that even Riester pension providers support obligatory information like standardized product information sheets. Further, the current legislative debate concerning these standardized information sheets is outlined. The article concludes that while product information sheets are a good way to increase transparency in the market, it should be accompanied with simplified products, financial education, and elimination of disincentives for pension consultants. Der Markt für Riester-Produkte ist intransparent. In diesem Artikel wird gezeigt, warum die Informationsasymmetrien zu Lasten der Verbraucher nicht durch den Markt aufgelöst werden können, sondern nur durch staatliche Vorgaben. Eine empirische Erhebung verdeutlicht, dass auch die Produktanbieter Informationspflichten wie ein standardisiertes Produktinformationsblatt befürworten. Ein solches wird derzeit vom Gesetzgeber geplant; dazu wird der aktuelle Diskussionsstand zusammengefasst. Im Ergebnis wird das standardisierte PIB als der richtige Weg zur Herstellung von mehr Produkttransparenz angesehen, das jedoch durch ergänzende Maßnahmen wie Produktvereinfachung, finanzielle Bildung und den Abbau von Fehlanreizen in der Vorsorgeberatung begleitet werden sollte.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://ejournals.duncker-humblot.de/doi/pdfplus/10.3790/vjh.81.2.55
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research in its journal Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung.

    Volume (Year): 81 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 55-69

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:81-2-5
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Mohrenstraße 58, D-10117 Berlin
    Phone: xx49-30-89789-0
    Fax: xx49-30-89789-200
    Web page: http://www.diw.de/en
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:81-2-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bibliothek)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.