IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v53y2025i28.html

Mapping son preference in India, 2002–2021: Spatial patterns and trends using model-based small area estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Ashish Kumar Upadhyay

    (International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS))

  • Sabu Padmadas

    (University of Southampton)

  • Abhishek Singh

    (International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS))

  • Kaushalendra Kumar

    (International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS))

  • Fiifi Amoako Johnson

    (University of Cape Coast)

  • Ashish Singh

    (Shailesh J. Mehta School of Management (SJMSoM), Bombay)

  • Nikos Tzavidis

    (University of Southampton)

Abstract

Background: Despite widespread interest in son preference in India, the study of its spatial distribution and trends by parity at the district level is limited. Objective: This study investigates spatial patterns and temporal trends in son preference by parity across districts of India from 2002 to 2021. Methods: We applied model-based area-level small area estimation techniques on data from consecutive rounds of the Indian National Family Health Survey and the District Level Household Survey to derive district-level estimates of son preference by parity. Spatial patterns and clustering were examined using Moran’s I and local indicators of spatial autocorrelation across multiple rounds of survey. Results: At parity 1, only a few districts showed a strong son preference in 2002–2004, but this number steadily increased in each subsequent survey round. In contrast, the number of districts with high son preference at parity 2 rose in 2007–2008 and then declined in subsequent rounds. At parity 3 or higher, the number of districts showing a strong son preference declined consistently in each subsequent survey round. Conclusions: Son preference in India exhibits distinct spatial and evolving temporal patterns across parities. The increasing prevalence at parity 1 and declining trends at higher parities suggest shifting reproductive behaviours. These findings underscore the need for targeted district-level, parity-specific interventions to address persistent and emerging gender-biased norms in son preference. Contribution: This study is the first of its kind to examine trends in son preference by parity across Indian districts in the last two decades using data from four consecutive rounds of large-scale national household surveys conducted between 2002 and 2021.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashish Kumar Upadhyay & Sabu Padmadas & Abhishek Singh & Kaushalendra Kumar & Fiifi Amoako Johnson & Ashish Singh & Nikos Tzavidis, 2025. "Mapping son preference in India, 2002–2021: Spatial patterns and trends using model-based small area estimation," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 53(28), pages 915-936.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:53:y:2025:i:28
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol53/28/53-28.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.28?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Bongaarts, 2013. "The Implementation of Preferences for Male Offspring," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 39(2), pages 185-208, June.
    2. Fengqing Chao & Christophe Z Guilmoto & Samir K. C. & Hernando Ombao, 2020. "Probabilistic projection of the sex ratio at birth and missing female births by State and Union Territory in India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Rebeca Echávarri & Roberto Ezcurra, 2010. "Education and gender bias in the sex ratio at birth: Evidence from India," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 47(1), pages 249-268, February.
    4. Ashish Singh & Sarthak Gaurav & Upasak Das, 2013. "Household Headship and Academic Skills of Indian Children: A Special Focus on Gender Disparities [Sexe du chef de ménage et compétences scolaires des enfants indiens : une analyse des disparités en," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 29(4), pages 445-466, November.
    5. Shelley Clark, 2000. "Son preference and sex composition of children: Evidence from india," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 37(1), pages 95-108, February.
    6. Ridhi Kashyap, 2019. "Is prenatal sex selection associated with lower female child mortality?," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(1), pages 57-78, January.
    7. Archana Patel & Neetu Badhoniya & Manju Mamtani & Hemant Kulkarni, 2013. "Skewed Sex Ratios in India: “Physician, Heal Thyself”," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 50(3), pages 1129-1134, June.
    8. Nadia Diamond-Smith & David Bishai, 2015. "Evidence of Self-correction of Child Sex Ratios in India: A District-Level Analysis of Child Sex Ratios From 1981 to 2011," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 52(2), pages 641-666, April.
    9. Marie-Claire Robitaille & Ishita Chatterjee, 2018. "Sex-selective Abortions and Infant Mortality in India: The Role of Parents’ Stated Son Preference," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 47-56, January.
    10. Aksan, Anna-Maria, 2021. "Son preference and the fertility squeeze in India," Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 87(1), pages 67-106, March.
    11. Ridhi Kashyap & Francisco Villavicencio, 2016. "The Dynamics of Son Preference, Technology Diffusion, and Fertility Decline Underlying Distorted Sex Ratios at Birth: A Simulation Approach," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 53(5), pages 1261-1281, October.
    12. Heather Congdon Fors & Annika Lindskog, 2023. "Son preference and education Inequalities in India: the role of gender-biased fertility strategies and preferential treatment of boys," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(3), pages 1431-1460, July.
    13. Ridhi Kashyap & Julia Behrman, 2020. "Gender Discrimination and Excess Female Under-5 Mortality in India: A New Perspective Using Mixed-Sex Twins," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(6), pages 2143-2167, December.
    14. Anna-Maria AKSAN, 2021. "Son preference and the fertility squeeze in India," JODE - Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 87(1), pages 67-106, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abhishek Singh & Sabu Padmadas & Kaushalendra Kumar & Fiifi Amoako Johnson & Ashish Kumar Upadhyay & Ashish Singh, 2022. "Spatial heterogeneity in son preference across India’s 640 districts: An application of small-area estimation," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 47(26), pages 793-842.
    2. Heather Congdon Fors & Annika Lindskog, 2023. "Son preference and education Inequalities in India: the role of gender-biased fertility strategies and preferential treatment of boys," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(3), pages 1431-1460, July.
    3. Echávarri, Rebeca & Husillos, Javier, 2016. "The Missing Link Between Parents’ Preferences and Daughters’ Survival: The Moderator Effect of Societal Discrimination," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 372-385.
    4. Rebeca Echavarri, 2025. "Sex-Selective Abortions and Fatal Neglect of Young Girls," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 44(1), pages 1-32, February.
    5. Ridhi Kashyap & Julia Behrman, 2020. "Gender Discrimination and Excess Female Under-5 Mortality in India: A New Perspective Using Mixed-Sex Twins," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(6), pages 2143-2167, December.
    6. Thomas Fent & Stefan Wrzaczek & Gustav Feichtinger & Andreas Novak, 2024. "Fertility decline and age-structure in China and India," VID Working Papers 2401, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna.
    7. Valentine Becquet & Nicolás Sacco & Ignacio Pardo, 2022. "Disparities in Gender Preference and Fertility: Southeast Asia and Latin America in a Comparative Perspective," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(3), pages 1295-1323, June.
    8. Anna‐Maria Aksan, 2022. "Son preference and the demographic transition," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 32-56, February.
    9. Srinivas Goli & Somya Arora & Neha Jain & Sekher T. V., 2024. "Patrilocality and Child Sex Ratios in India," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 43(4), pages 1-28, August.
    10. Abdel Ghany, Jasmin & Wilde, Joshua K. & Dimitrova, Anna & Kashyap, Ridhi & Muttarak, Raya, 2024. "Temperature and Sex Ratios at Birth," OSF Preprints wj7ke, Center for Open Science.
    11. repec:osf:osfxxx:wj7ke_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Abdel Ghany, Jasmin & Wilde, Joshua & Dimitrova, Anna & Kashyap, Ridhi & Muttarak, Raya, 2024. "Temperature and Sex Ratios at Birth," IZA Discussion Papers 17310, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Wanru Xiong, 2022. "Dynamics between Regional Sex Ratios at Birth and Sex Ratios at Prime Marriageable Ages in China," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 48(2), pages 545-578, June.
    14. Nadia Diamond-Smith & David Bishai, 2015. "Evidence of Self-correction of Child Sex Ratios in India: A District-Level Analysis of Child Sex Ratios From 1981 to 2011," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 52(2), pages 641-666, April.
    15. Eleanor Jawon Choi & Jisoo Hwang, 2020. "Transition of Son Preference: Evidence From South Korea," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(2), pages 627-652, April.
    16. Neha Jain, 2022. "Patrilocality and Child Sex Ratios in India," Working Papers 2265, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.
    17. repec:osf:socarx:7qxyp_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Scott South & Katherine Trent & Sunita Bose, 2014. "Skewed Sex Ratios and Criminal Victimization in India," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(3), pages 1019-1040, June.
    19. Shanjukta Nath, 2023. "Explaining third birth patterns in India: causal effects of sibling sex composition," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(4), pages 2169-2203, October.
    20. Aradhana Kumari & Srinivas Goli, 2022. "Skewed child sex ratios in India: a revisit to geographical patterns and socio-economic correlates," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 45-72, March.
    21. Martin Kolk & Karim Jebari, 2022. "Sex Selection for Daughters: Demographic Consequences of Female-Biased Sex Ratios," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(4), pages 1619-1639, August.
    22. Fengqing Chao & Christophe Z Guilmoto & Samir K. C. & Hernando Ombao, 2020. "Probabilistic projection of the sex ratio at birth and missing female births by State and Union Territory in India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:53:y:2025:i:28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.