IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxp/jededu/v8y2024i3p53-65.html

Science Teaching Efficacy and Science Outcome Expectancy Among Early Childhood Preservice Teachers: Effects of Constructivist Beliefs vs. Traditional Beliefs

Author

Listed:
  • Hyunjin Kim

    (University of Rhode Island)

Abstract

This study examined early childhood preservice teachers¡¯ perceived science teaching efficacy and its association with their teaching beliefs (constructivist and traditional beliefs). The participants included 181 preservice teachers enrolled in an early childhood teacher education program at a university in the Midwestern United States. Information was collected using the Science Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument ¨C Preservice (STEBI-B) and Teaching Beliefs Survey (TBS). The results revealed that the preservice teachers were efficacious about their science teaching, showing a negative relation with traditional teaching beliefs and no statistically significant relation with constructivist teaching beliefs. The results of hierarchical regression analyses revealed that the preservice teachers¡¯ traditional teaching beliefs was a significant negative predictor of their personal science teaching efficacy and of their science teaching outcomes expectancy, while there was no significant effect of constructivist beliefs on them. These results suggest that when preservice teachers adhere to traditional teaching methods, it can lower their confidence and expectations about their effectiveness in teaching science. This underscores the current trend in early childhood education towards promoting innovative, student-centered teaching practices. By moving away from traditional beliefs and embracing more constructivist and inquiry-based approaches, teacher education programs can better prepare preservice teachers to create dynamic, effective, and engaging science classrooms for young children. This approach aligns with contemporary educational practices that prioritize hands-on learning and critical thinking, laying a strong foundation for students' lifelong interest and involvement in STEM subjects.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyunjin Kim, 2024. "Science Teaching Efficacy and Science Outcome Expectancy Among Early Childhood Preservice Teachers: Effects of Constructivist Beliefs vs. Traditional Beliefs," Journal of Education and Development, Julypress, vol. 8(3), pages 53-65, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cxp:jededu:v:8:y:2024:i:3:p:53-65
    DOI: 10.20849/jed.v8i3.1438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.chapjulypress.org/index.php/jed/article/view/2920/1191
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20849/jed.v8i3.1438?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxp:jededu:v:8:y:2024:i:3:p:53-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.chapjulypress.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.