IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cwd/ijbmnz/v4y2025i3p15-26.html

Taxation and economic growth in Post-Soviet countries

Author

Listed:
  • Altynay Zhalgassova

    (KIMEP University)

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between taxation and economic growth in seven post-Soviet economies—Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Uzbekistan, and Russia—over the period 1999–2023. Using panel data from the World Bank and applying the Long-Term Growth Model (LTGM) alongside an econometric regression framework, this research analyzes the impact of direct and indirect taxation, foreign direct investment (FDI), gross savings, institutional quality, and other key economic factors on GDP growth. The regression results reveal that direct taxes do not have a statistically significant effect on GDP growth, whereas indirect taxes on international trade (IndTx2) demonstrate a positive and statistically meaningful impact at the 5% level. FDI and gross savings emerge as the most significant drivers of economic growth, with both variables showing strong statistical importance at the 1% level. Institutional effectiveness, measured by economic management quality, exhibits a weakly significant positive association with GDP growth, suggesting that better governance may support economic improvements. Investment and population growth, however, do not display significant effects on GDP growth within the analyzed model. The overall explanatory power of the model is moderate, with an R-squared value of 0.256 and an adjusted R-squared of 0.184. These findings suggest that, for post-Soviet economies, indirect taxation, foreign direct investment, and savings play a crucial role in fostering economic growth, while direct taxation has a limited influence. Additionally, governance quality may contribute to improved economic outcomes. The study provides valuable insights for policymakers in structuring taxation policies that support sustainable economic development in transition economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Altynay Zhalgassova, 2025. "Taxation and economic growth in Post-Soviet countries," International Journal of Business and Management (IJBM), International Emerging Scholars Society (IESS), New Zealand, vol. 4(3 [Specia), pages 15-26, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cwd:ijbmnz:v:4:y:2025:i:3:p:15-26
    DOI: 10.56879/ijbm.v4i3.21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iessociety.org/index.php/IJBM/article/download/173/43
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56879/ijbm.v4i3.21?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madsen, J & Damania, D, 1996. "The Macroeconomic Effects of a Switch from Direct to Indirect Taxes: An Empirical Assessment," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 43(5), pages 566-578, November.
    2. Mr. David A. Grigorian & Mr. Hamid R Davoodi, 2007. "Tax Potential vs. Tax Effort: A Cross-Country Analysis of Armenia's Stubbornly Low Tax Collection," IMF Working Papers 2007/106, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Attiya Y. Javid & Umaima Arif, 2012. "Analysis of Revenue Potential and Revenue Effort in Developing Asian Countries," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 51(4), pages 365-380.
    2. Armenak Antinyan & Luca Corazzini & Filippo Pavesi, 2018. "What Matters for Whistleblowing on Tax Evaders? Survey and Experimental Evidence," Working Papers 07/2018, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    3. Gohar S. Sedrakyan, 2017. "The Effects of Presumptive Methods of Taxation on Revenue Mobilization in the Value Added Tax," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1718, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    4. Productivity Commission, 2008. "Assessing Local Government Revenue Raising Capacity," Research Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 26, January.
    5. Cao, Rui-fen & Zhang, An-lu & Cai, Yin-ying & Xie, Xiang-xiang, 2020. "How imbalanced land development affects local fiscal condition? A case study of Hubei Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Abel Gwaindepi, 2021. "Domestic revenue mobilisation in developing countries: An exploratory analysis of sub‐Saharan Africa and Latin America," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 396-421, March.
    7. Ganesh Kawadia & Ankit Kumar Suryawanshi, 2023. "Tax Effort of the Indian States from 2001–2002 to 2016–2017: A Stochastic Frontier Approach," Millennial Asia, , vol. 14(1), pages 85-101, March.
    8. Mawejje, Joseph & Sebudde, Rachel K., 2019. "Tax revenue potential and effort: Worldwide estimates using a new dataset," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 119-129.
    9. Cosmina-ȘTefania Chiricu, 2019. "The Analysis Of The Economic Impact Of Vat On The Economic Growth In Southern Europe," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 24, pages 47-56, December.
    10. Kashif Munir & Maryam Sultan, 2018. "Are some taxes better for growth in Pakistan? A time series analysis," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 45(10), pages 1439-1452, August.
    11. OGNERU, Victor, 2019. "Analysis Of The Relationship Between Tax Revenue And Gross Value Added In The Romanian Economy," Studii Financiare (Financial Studies), Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 23(2), pages 37-55, June.
    12. Mamadou Bah, 2024. "Tax revenue mobilization and institutional quality in sub‐Saharan Africa: An empirical investigation," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 36(2), pages 201-221, June.
    13. Mr. Marco Committeri & Ms. Carola Pessino, 2013. "Understanding Countries’ Tax Effort," IMF Working Papers 2013/244, International Monetary Fund.
    14. Pengyu Ren & Toure Moumbark & Ebenezer Appiah & Yawovi M. A. Koudalo, 2025. "Financial Inclusion, Mobile Money, and Tax Revenue in Africa," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440251, February.
    15. Arvin, Mak B. & Pradhan, Rudra P. & Nair, Mahendhiran S., 2021. "Are there links between institutional quality, government expenditure, tax revenue and economic growth? Evidence from low-income and lower middle-income countries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 468-489.
    16. Carola Pessino & Ricardo Fenochietto, 2010. "Determining countries tax effort," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 195(4), pages 65-87, december.
    17. Gwaindepi, Abel, 2019. "Domestic revenue mobilization in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America: A comparative analysis since 1980," Lund Papers in Economic History 209, Lund University, Department of Economic History.
    18. Lien, Nguyen Phuong, 2015. "The impact of institutional quality on tax revenue in developing countries," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(10), pages 181-195, October.
    19. Dokas, Ioannis & Panagiotidis, Minas & Papadamou, Stephanos & Spyromitros, Eleftherios, 2024. "The impact of the shadow economy on the direct-indirect tax mix: Can central banks’ independence mitigate the effect?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 475-493.
    20. Sacchidananda Mukherjee, 2020. "Goods and Services Tax efficiency across Indian States: panel stochastic frontier analysis," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 225-251, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cwd:ijbmnz:v:4:y:2025:i:3:p:15-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cindy Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iessociety.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.