IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvv/journ4/v5y2018i4p268-273.html

Criticizing the critiques of green accounting research

Author

Listed:
  • Hsiu-Yu LEE
  • Mu-Chen HU
  • Yu-Ting LIN
  • Yu-Sheng YAIN

Abstract

This article critically examines the existing critiques of green accounting research, highlighting methodological gaps and proposing a more integrative framework for environmental accounting practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsiu-Yu LEE & Mu-Chen HU & Yu-Ting LIN & Yu-Sheng YAIN, 2018. "Criticizing the critiques of green accounting research," Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, EconSciences Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 268-273, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cvv:journ4:v:5:y:2018:i:4:p:268-273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/JSAS/article/download/1808/1926
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/JSAS/article/view/1808
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tiina Onkila & Kristiina Joensuu & Marileena Koskela, 2014. "Implications of Managerial Framing of Stakeholders in Environmental Reports," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 134-156, December.
    2. Wei Qian & Roger Burritt & Jin Chen, 2015. "The potential for environmental management accounting development in China," Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(3), pages 406-428, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huibrecht Margaretha van der Poll, 2022. "The barriers and drivers of environmental management accounting practices' adoption in developed and developing countries for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1222-1234, October.
    2. Chua, Wai Fong & Dai, Narisa Tianjing & Tan, Zhiyuan (Simon) & Yu, Lichen, 2024. "Researching the accounting-state-market dynamic in China: A literature review and research agenda," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(5).
    3. Irene M. Herremans & Jamal A. Nazari & Fereshteh Mahmoudian, 2016. "Stakeholder Relationships, Engagement, and Sustainability Reporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 417-435, October.
    4. Musaab Alnaim & Abdelmoneim Bahyeldin Mohamed Metwally, 2024. "Institutional Pressures and Environmental Management Accounting Adoption: Do Environmental Strategy Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, April.
    5. María Consuelo Pucheta‐Martínez & Inmaculada Bel‐Oms & Lúcia Lima Rodrigues, 2020. "Does stakeholder engagement encourage environmental reporting? The mediating role of firm performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3025-3037, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvv:journ4:v:5:y:2018:i:4:p:268-273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bilal KARGI (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/JSAS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.