IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v23y2015i01p76-91_01.html

Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data

Author

Listed:
  • Barberá, Pablo

Abstract

Politicians and citizens increasingly engage in political conversations on social media outlets such as Twitter. In this article, I show that the structure of the social networks in which they are embedded can be a source of information about their ideological positions. Under the assumption that social networks are homophilic, I develop a Bayesian Spatial Following model that considers ideology as a latent variable, whose value can be inferred by examining which politics actors each user is following. This method allows us to estimate ideology for more actors than any existing alternative, at any point in time and across many polities. I apply this method to estimate ideal points for a large sample of both elite and mass public Twitter users in the United States and five European countries. The estimated positions of legislators and political parties replicate conventional measures of ideology. The method is also able to successfully classify individuals who state their political preferences publicly and a sample of users matched with their party registration records. To illustrate the potential contribution of these estimates, I examine the extent to which online behavior during the 2012 US presidential election campaign is clustered along ideological lines.

Suggested Citation

  • Barberá, Pablo, 2015. "Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 76-91, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:23:y:2015:i:01:p:76-91_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S104719870001161X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karsten Müller & Carlo Rasmus Schwarz & Zekai Shen, 2026. "Social Media vs. Democracy: Evidence from the January 6th Insurrection," CESifo Working Paper Series 12485, CESifo.
    2. repec:osf:socarx:dnrg6_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Mller, Karsten & Schwarz, Carlo & Shen, Zekai, 2026. "Social Media vs. Democracy: Evidence from the January 6th Insurrection," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 794, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    4. Kotkaniemi, Anniina & Ylä-Anttila, Tuomas & Chen, Ted Hsuan Yun, 2023. "Policy Influence and Influencers Online and Off," SocArXiv dnrg6, Center for Open Science.
    5. Luis Menéndez & Daniel Montolio & Hannes Mueller & Francesco Slataper, 2025. "Breaking the Echo Chamber: Social Media Networks and Political Conflict," Working Papers 1505, Barcelona School of Economics.
    6. Axel Dreher & Sarah Langlotz & Johannes Matzat & Christopher Parsons, 2020. "Immigration, Political Ideologies, and the Polarization of American Politics," CESifo Working Paper Series 8789, CESifo.
    7. Nunnari, Salvatore & Zápal, Jan, 2017. "Dynamic Elections and Ideological Polarization," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(4), pages 505-534, October.
    8. Walk, Erin & Garimella, Kiran & Christia, Fotini, 2023. "Displacement and return in the internet Era: Social media for monitoring migration decisions in Northern Syria," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    9. Nicholas Haas & Rebecca B. Morton, 2018. "Saying versus doing: a new donation method for measuring ideal points," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 79-106, July.
    10. Yiran Chen & Hanming Fang, 2017. "Inferring the Ideological Affiliations of Political Committees via Financial Contributions Networks," NBER Working Papers 24130, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/54p3kn4dif9c6p441joi37h8vp is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Max Viskanic, 2019. "Fear and loathing on the campaign trail 2016-18 : migrants, refugees and the rise of far right populism [Peur et haine dans la campagne électorale 2016-18 : migrants, réfugiés et la montée du populisme d’extrême droite]," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) tel-03369802, HAL.
    13. Max Viskanic, 2019. "Fear and loathing on the campaign trail 2016-18 : migrants, refugees and the rise of far right populism [Peur et haine dans la campagne électorale 2016-18 : migrants, réfugiés et la montée du popul," SciencePo Working papers tel-03369802, HAL.
    14. Cerina, Roberto & Duch, Raymond, 2020. "Measuring public opinion via digital footprints," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 987-1002.
    15. Keng-Chi Chang & Chun-Fang Chiang & Ming-Jen Lin, 2021. "Using Facebook data to predict the 2016 U.S. presidential election," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, December.
    16. Thomas Fujiwara & Karsten Müller & Carlo Schwarz, 2024. "The Effect of Social Media on Elections: Evidence from The United States," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(3), pages 1495-1539.
    17. Motz, Nicolas, 2016. "How Political Parties Shape Electoral Competition," MPRA Paper 69351, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Joan C Timoneda, 2018. "Where in the world is my tweet: Detecting irregular removal patterns on Twitter," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Thomas Fujiwara & Karsten Müller & Carlo Schwarz, 2021. "The Effect of Social Media on Elections: Evidence from the United States," NBER Working Papers 28849, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:23:y:2015:i:01:p:76-91_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.