IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v13y2005i01p1-22_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reaching Migrants in Survey Research: The Use of the Global Positioning System to Reduce Coverage Bias in China

Author

Listed:
  • Landry, Pierre F.
  • Shen, Mingming

Abstract

List-based samples are often biased because of coverage errors. The problem is especially acute in societies where the level of internal migration is high and where record keeping on the population is not reliable. We propose a solution based on spatial sampling that overcomes the inability to reach migrants in traditional area samples based on household lists. A comparison between a traditional study and our sample of Beijing demonstrates that coverage bias is greatly reduced. The successful incorporation of mobile urban residents has important substantive effects, in both univariate and multivariate analyses of public opinion data.

Suggested Citation

  • Landry, Pierre F. & Shen, Mingming, 2005. "Reaching Migrants in Survey Research: The Use of the Global Positioning System to Reduce Coverage Bias in China," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:13:y:2005:i:01:p:1-22_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047198700000954/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jason Y Wu, 2019. "A spatial valence model of political participation in China," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 31(2), pages 244-259, April.
    2. James K. Hammitt & Fangli Geng & Xiaoqi Guo & Chris P. Nielsen, 2019. "Valuing mortality risk in China: Comparing stated-preference estimates from 2005 and 2016," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 167-186, June.
    3. Juan Chen & Shuo Chen & Pierre F. Landry, 2015. "Urbanization and Mental Health in China: Linking the 2010 Population Census with a Cross-Sectional Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Poteete, Amy R. & Ostrom, Elinor, 2008. "Fifteen Years of Empirical Research on Collective Action in Natural Resource Management: Struggling to Build Large-N Databases Based on Qualitative Research," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 176-195, January.
    5. Juan Chen & Lin Gong & Shenghua Xie, 2021. "Psychological Distress in Urbanizing China: How Does Local Government Effectiveness Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Chen, Juan, 2011. "Internal migration and health: Re-examining the healthy migrant phenomenon in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(8), pages 1294-1301, April.
    7. John Gibson & David McKenzie, 2007. "Using Global Positioning Systems in Household Surveys for Better Economics and Better Policy," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 22(2), pages 217-241, September.
    8. Chen, Juan & Chen, Shuo & Landry, Pierre F., 2013. "Migration, environmental hazards, and health outcomes in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 85-95.
    9. H. Christoph Steinhardt & Jan Delhey, 2020. "Socio-Economic Modernization and the “Crisis of Trust” in China: A Multi-level Analysis of General and Particular Trust," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 923-949, December.
    10. Yao‐Yuan Yeh & Robert Harmel, 2021. "Identifying and Understanding Distinctive Political Attitudes of Chinese Migrant Workers: A Research Note," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(1), pages 154-165, January.
    11. Weihua An & Adam N. Glynn, 2021. "Treatment Effect Deviation as an Alternative to Blinder–Oaxaca Decomposition for Studying Social Inequality," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 50(3), pages 1006-1033, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:13:y:2005:i:01:p:1-22_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.