IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v10y2004i01p38-53_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust: A Neglected Variable in Team Effectiveness Research

Author

Listed:
  • Kiffin-Petersen, Sandra

Abstract

Trust is frequently espoused as being critical to effective team processes and performance. Yet, few studies have investigated the relationship between trust and team processes, or team effectiveness. There is currently a need to locate propensity to trust (a personality composition variable) and intragroup trust (an emergent state) within mainstream team effectiveness models, not only to provide much-needed theoretical and empirical support for trust's central role in team effectiveness, but also to increase our understanding of how trust influences team effectiveness. This paper argues that trust is a neglected variable within team effectiveness research that requires further empirical investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiffin-Petersen, Sandra, 2004. "Trust: A Neglected Variable in Team Effectiveness Research," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 38-53, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:10:y:2004:i:01:p:38-53_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367200004600/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suhkyung Shin & Kyungbin Kwon & Jiyoon Jung, 2022. "Collaborative Learning in the Flipped University Classroom: Identifying Team Process Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    2. McCarter, Matthew & Sheremeta, Roman, 2013. "You Can’t Put Old Wine in New Bottles: The Effect of Newcomers on Coordination in Groups," MPRA Paper 43532, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Stein T Holden & Mesfin Tilahun, 2021. "Preferences, trust, and performance in youth business groups," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-28, September.
    4. Yusuf Sidani & Jon Thornberry, 2010. "The Current Arab Work Ethic: Antecedents, Implications, and Potential Remedies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(1), pages 35-49, January.
    5. Holden, Stein T. & Tilahun, Mesfin, 2019. "How Do Social Preferences and Norms of Reciprocity affect Generalized and Particularized Trust?," CLTS Working Papers 8/19, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies, revised 10 Oct 2019.
    6. Asif Mehmood Rana & Kashif-ur-Rehman, 2015. "Inter Relationship between Team Conflict Management, Employee Satisfaction and Organizational Performance," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 7(2), pages 93-99.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:10:y:2004:i:01:p:38-53_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.