IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v47y1993i01p77-106_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What was bipolarity?

Author

Listed:
  • Wagner, R. Harrison

Abstract

In spite of its widespread use, no one has ever stated clearly what the distinction between bipolar and multipolar systems refers to. Moreover, some common definitions of “bipolarity†imply behavior that is inconsistent with the behavior of states during the cold war. This article argues that the distinctive feature of post–World War II international politics was not that two states were more powerful than the others, as the literature on bipolarity would suggest, but that one state, the Soviet Union, occupied in peacetime a position of near-dominance on the Eurasian continent, a position that states in the past had been able to achieve only after a series of military victories. This fact explains the behavior that others have sought to explain by bipolarity, as well as behavior that is inconsistent with what common definitions of bipolarity would lead us to expect. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of the argument for structural theories of international politics and controversies about what lies ahead.

Suggested Citation

  • Wagner, R. Harrison, 1993. "What was bipolarity?," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(1), pages 77-106, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:47:y:1993:i:01:p:77-106_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818300004719/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. R. Harrison Wagner, 2004. "Bargaining, War, and Alliances," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(3), pages 215-231, July.
    2. Lisa L. Martin, 1994. "4. Heterogeneity, Linkage and Commons Problems," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 6(4), pages 473-493, October.
    3. Duncan Snidal, 1994. "3. The Politics of Scope: Endogenous Actors, Heterogeneity and Institutions," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 6(4), pages 449-472, October.
    4. Ahmed Ijaz Malik & Muhammad Nadeem Mirza & Irfan Hasnain Qaisrani, 2020. "Übergänge In Der Globalen Polarität Und Die Strategie Der Vereinigten Staaten Von Amerika Gegenüber Südasien [Transitions In Global Polarity And The United States Of America’S Strategy Toward South," Post-Print halshs-03787681, HAL.
    5. Lachowicz, Mirosław & Leszczyński, Henryk & Topolski, Krzysztof A., 2019. "Self-organization with small range interactions: Equilibria and creation of bipolarity," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 343(C), pages 156-166.
    6. Jonathan N Markowitz & Christopher J Fariss, 2018. "Power, proximity, and democracy," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(1), pages 78-93, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:47:y:1993:i:01:p:77-106_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.