IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/entsoc/v15y2014i02p252-284_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Women on Board: Female Board Membership as a Form of Elite Democratization

Author

Listed:
  • Heemskerk, Eelke Michiel
  • Fennema, Meindert

Abstract

Corporate elites have been all-male bastions until the twenty-first century. The recent inclusion of women in the corporate elite needs explanation because it is an abrupt change in recruitment practices. We consider female presence in corporate boards as a sign of the democratization of elite social networks. Building on a case study of the Netherlands that covers the last four decades, we show that the corporate elite has become more open to nonmembers of traditional elites. In the process, women have also entered the boardroom. Initially, these were predominantly female politicians, but more recently many large corporations have recruited foreign females. We argue that the incremental feminization of the corporate elite was in the beginning—that is in the 1970s—initiated by the state but was subsequently pushed forward by the internationalization of corporate governance. We have traced the professional background of all female board members of the largest firms in the Netherlands over the period 1969–2011. We show that the female board members do not form a homogeneous group. The first wave of female directors had a political background, the second wave had an academic background, whereas the third wave was recruited from within the corporations. In this third wave, foreign female directors became predominant. Elites open up their ranks and privileged positions to women, but they do so reluctantly and under outside pressure.

Suggested Citation

  • Heemskerk, Eelke Michiel & Fennema, Meindert, 2014. "Women on Board: Female Board Membership as a Form of Elite Democratization," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 252-284, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:entsoc:v:15:y:2014:i:02:p:252-284_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1467222700000306/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rebérioux, Antoine & Roudaut, Gwenael, 2016. "Gender Quota inside the Boardroom: Female Directors as New Key Players?," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) 1603, CEPREMAP.
    2. Sapinski, Jean Philippe & Carroll, William K., 2017. "Interlocking directorates and corporate networks," SocArXiv 7t8c9, Center for Open Science.
    3. Lopez-Gomez, Laura & Martinez-Rodrigue, Susana, 2023. "Can economic rationality explain the feminization of shareholding? Evidence from female shareholders in Spain (1918-1948)," MPRA Paper 119740, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Florence Villesèche & Evis Sinani, 2023. "From Presence to Influence: Gender, Nationality and Network Centrality of Corporate Directors," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(2), pages 486-504, April.
    5. Arun Upadhyay, 2014. "Social Concentration on Boards, Corporate Information Environment and Cost of Capital," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(7-8), pages 974-1001, September.
    6. Dorota Korenkiewicz & Wolfgang Maennig, 2023. "Women on a Corporate Board of Directors and Consumer Satisfaction," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 3904-3928, December.
    7. Nana de Graaff & Diliara Valeeva, 2021. "Emerging Sino–European Corporate Elite Networks," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(5), pages 1147-1173, September.
    8. Alberto Rinaldi & Giulia Tagliazucchi, 2018. "Women Entrepreneurs in Italy: A Prosopographic Study," Department of Economics 0129, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    9. Katherina Kuschel & Erica Salvaj, 2018. "Opening the “Black Box”. Factors Affecting Women’s Journey to Top Management Positions: A Framework Applied to Chile," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, October.
    10. Antoine Rebérioux & Gwenael Roudaut, 2017. "Gender Quota and Inequalities inside the Boardroom," Working Papers hal-01618949, HAL.
    11. Jidong Zhang & Jing Han & Meiqun Yin, 2018. "A female style in corporate social responsibility? Evidence from charitable donations," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(3), pages 185-196, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:entsoc:v:15:y:2014:i:02:p:252-284_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/eso .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.