IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/demeco/v90y2024i3p384-411_3.html

The within-country distribution of brain drain and brain gain effects: A case study on Senegal

Author

Listed:
  • Bocquier, Philippe
  • Cha'ngom, Narcisse
  • Docquier, Frédéric
  • Machado, Joël

Abstract

Existing empirical literature provides converging evidence that selective emigration enhances human capital accumulation in the world's poorest countries. However, the within-country distribution of such brain gain effects has received limited attention. Focusing on Senegal, we provide evidence that the brain gain mechanism primarily benefits the wealthiest regions that are internationally connected and have better access to education. Conversely, human capital responses are negligible in regions lacking international connectivity, and even negative in better connected regions with inadequate educational opportunities. These results extend to internal migration, implying that highly vulnerable populations are trapped in the least developed areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Bocquier, Philippe & Cha'ngom, Narcisse & Docquier, Frédéric & Machado, Joël, 2024. "The within-country distribution of brain drain and brain gain effects: A case study on Senegal," Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 90(3), pages 384-411, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:demeco:v:90:y:2024:i:3:p:384-411_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2054089223000275/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:demeco:v:90:y:2024:i:3:p:384-411_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/dem .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.