IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v21y2011i02p205-231_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Role of Moral Principles in Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Smith, Jeffery
  • Dubbink, Wim

Abstract

Does effective moral judgment in business ethics rely upon the identification of a suitable set of moral principles? We address this question by examining a number of criticisms of the role that principles can play in moral judgment. Critics claim that reliance on principles requires moral agents to abstract themselves from actual circumstances, relationships and personal commitments in answering moral questions. This is said to enforce an artificial uniformity in moral judgment. We challenge these critics by developing an account of principle-based moral judgment that has been widely discussed by contemporary Kantian scholars. In so doing we respond to some basic problems raised by so-called “moral particularists†who voice theoretical objections to the role of principles as well as to contemporary business ethicists who have criticized principle-based moral judgment along similar lines. We conclude with some future areas of research.

Suggested Citation

  • Smith, Jeffery & Dubbink, Wim, 2011. "Understanding the Role of Moral Principles in Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 205-231, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:21:y:2011:i:02:p:205-231_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00010393/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Montgomery Van Wart, 2014. "Contemporary Varieties of Ethical Leadership in Organizations," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(5), pages 27-45, September.
    2. Patricia Larres & Martin Kelly, 2023. "A Framework for Authentic Ethical Decision Making in the Face of Grand Challenges: A Lonerganian Gradation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(2), pages 521-533, January.
    3. Paul Lindhout & Genserik Reniers, 2021. "Involving Moral and Ethical Principles in Safety Management Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Yoav Gal & Adiv Gal, 2019. "Knowledge Bias: Neo-feudalism and Other Reasons to Avoid Sharing Knowledge by Knowledge Workers," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(2), pages 826-848, June.
    5. Mary M. Crossan & Alyson Byrne & Gerard H. Seijts & Mark Reno & Lucas Monzani & Jeffrey Gandz, 2017. "Toward a Framework of Leader Character in Organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(7), pages 986-1018, November.
    6. Michaela Haase & Emmanuel Raufflet, 2017. "Ideologies in Markets, Organizations, and Business Ethics: Drafting a Map: Introduction to the Special Issue," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(4), pages 629-639, June.
    7. Katinka Cranenburgh & Daniel Arenas, 2014. "Strategic and Moral Dilemmas of Corporate Philanthropy in Developing Countries: Heineken in Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 523-536, July.
    8. Matthew Caulfield, 2021. "Pay Secrecy, Discrimination, and Autonomy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 399-420, June.
    9. Marc Orlitzky, 2017. "How Cognitive Neuroscience Informs a Subjectivist-Evolutionary Explanation of Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(4), pages 717-732, September.
    10. Tae Wan Kim, 2021. "Flawed Like Us and the Starry Moral Law: Review of Machines Like Me by Ian McEwan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 875-879, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:21:y:2011:i:02:p:205-231_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.