IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v37y2007i01p47-69_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credible Keynesianism? New Labour Macroeconomic Policy and the Political Economy of Coarse Tuning

Author

Listed:
  • CLIFT, BEN
  • TOMLINSON, JIM

Abstract

This article questions prevailing interpretations of New Labour's political economy and challenges the assumption within the comparative and international political economy literatures of the exhaustion of the Keynesian political economic paradigm. New Labour's doctrinal statements are analysed to establish to what extent these doctrinal positions involve a repudiation of Keynesianism. Although New Labour has explicitly renounced the ‘fine tuning’ often (somewhat problematically) associated with post-war Keynesian political economy, we argue that they have carved out policy space in which to engage in macroeconomic ‘coarse tuning’ inspired by Keynesian thinking. This capacity to ‘coarse tune’ is precisely what is being sought in New Labour's quest for credibility through the redesign of British macroeconomic policy framework and institutions. Our empirical focus on New Labour in government since 1997 offers considerable evidence that this search for the capacity to ‘coarse tune’ has been successful.

Suggested Citation

  • Clift, Ben & Tomlinson, Jim, 2007. "Credible Keynesianism? New Labour Macroeconomic Policy and the Political Economy of Coarse Tuning," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(1), pages 47-69, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:37:y:2007:i:01:p:47-69_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123407000038/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter M. Jackson, 2014. "Thatcherism and the public sector," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 266-280, May.
    2. Stephen Greasley & Chris Hanretty, 2012. "Culling the quangos: when is delegation revoked," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2012-12, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:37:y:2007:i:01:p:47-69_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.