IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v32y2002i01p21-62_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Deliberative Potential of Political Discussion

Author

Listed:
  • CONOVER, PAMELA JOHNSTON
  • SEARING, DONALD D.
  • CREWE, IVOR M.

Abstract

What is the deliberative potential of everyday political discussion? We address this question using survey data and qualitative data collected in six communities in the United States and Britain. Our findings suggest that political discussion is infrequently public, modestly contested and sometimes marred by inequality. But the factors inhibiting more deliberative discussions – structural, cultural and motivational in nature – should be amenable to some change, particularly through education.

Suggested Citation

  • Conover, Pamela Johnston & Searing, Donald D. & Crewe, Ivor M., 2002. "The Deliberative Potential of Political Discussion," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 21-62, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:32:y:2002:i:01:p:21-62_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123402000029/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gail Pacheco & Barrett Owen, 2015. "Moving through the political participation hierarchy: a focus on personal values," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 222-238, January.
    2. Joana Margarida Sequeira Neto & Etienne Mullet, 2018. "Perceived Acceptability of Organizational Layoffs and Job Alliances During a Recession: A Mapping of Portuguese People’s Views," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 1149-1157, November.
    3. Maija Karjalainen & Lauri Rapeli, 2015. "Who will not deliberate? Attrition in a multi-stage citizen deliberation experiment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 407-422, January.
    4. Johanna Kranz & Martin Schwichow & Petra Breitenmoser & Kai Niebert, 2022. "The (Un)political Perspective on Climate Change in Education—A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-44, April.
    5. Jonathan White & Lea Ypi, 2010. "Rethinking the Modern Prince: Partisanship and the Democratic Ethos," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(4), pages 809-828, October.
    6. Spörndli, Markus, 2003. "Discourse quality and political decisions: An empirical analysis of debates in the German conference committee," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Civil Society and Transnational Networks SP IV 2003-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:32:y:2002:i:01:p:21-62_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.