IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v98y2004i01p139-152_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contra Coercion: Russian Tax Reform, Exogenous Shocks, and Negotiated Institutional Change

Author

Listed:
  • LUONG, PAULINE JONES
  • WEINTHAL, ERIKA

Abstract

The view of institutions as coercion rather than as contracts dominates the comparative politics literature on both institutional creation and the politics of economic reform. The emergence of a collectively optimal tax code in Russia demonstrates the limitations of this emphasis on coercion. This new tax code was not imposed by a strong central leader, mandated by international institutions, or the result of state capture by powerful economic interest groups. Rather, it is the product of a mutually beneficial exchange between the Russian government and the Russian oil companies. Russia's ability to negotiate an effective tax regime also suggests the conditions under which and the microcausal mechanism whereby exogenous shocks promote institutional change and economic reform. Owing to their mutual vulnerability and interdependence, the August 1998 financial crisis generated widely shared perceptions among these actors that the payoffs of cooperation had changed. Yet the economic reform institution that resulted required a series of incremental strategic moves that established common knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Luong, Pauline Jones & Weinthal, Erika, 2004. "Contra Coercion: Russian Tax Reform, Exogenous Shocks, and Negotiated Institutional Change," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 98(1), pages 139-152, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:98:y:2004:i:01:p:139-152_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055404001054/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shurchkov, Olga, 2012. "New elites and their influence on entrepreneurial activity in Russia," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 240-255.
    2. Libman Alexander & Feld Lars P., 2013. "Strategic Tax Collection and Fiscal Decentralization: The Case of Russia," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 14(4), pages 449-482, December.
    3. Alexander Libman, 2006. "Government-Business Relations and Catching Up Reforms in the CIS," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 3(2), pages 263-288, December.
    4. Lev Freinkman & Andrei Yakovlev, 2015. "Institutional frameworks to support regulatory reform in middle-income economies: lessons from Russia's recent experience," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 354-369, September.
    5. Cristina Bodea & Adrienne LeBas, 2013. "The Origins of Social Contracts: Attitudes toward Taxation in Urban Nigeria," Economics Series Working Papers WPS/2013-02, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    6. Neil Robinson, 2011. "Political barriers to economic development in Russia," International Journal of Development Issues, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 5-19, April.
    7. Julia Skretting, 2022. "Oil Windfalls and Regional Economic Performance in Russia," Working Papers No 02/2022, Centre for Applied Macro- and Petroleum economics (CAMP), BI Norwegian Business School.
    8. Libman, Alexander, 2010. "Subnational resource curse: do economic or political institutions matter?," Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series 154, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management.
    9. Libman, Alexander, 2009. "Russian federalism and post-Soviet integration: Divergence of development paths," MPRA Paper 12944, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Libman, Alexander, 2013. "Natural resources and sub-national economic performance: Does sub-national democracy matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 82-99.
    11. He Gao & Walter Timo de Vries & Minrui Zheng & Jianping Ye, 2023. "State Capacity to Influence Actor Relations within the Chinese Real Estate Market: An Analytical Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Yakovlev, Andrei, 2016. "What is Russia trying to defend?," BOFIT Policy Briefs 2/2016, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    13. Yakovlev, Andrei, 2016. "What is Russia trying to defend?," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 146-161.
    14. Hassan, Mirza & Prichard, Wilson, 2016. "The Political Economy of Domestic Tax Reform in Bangladesh: Political Settlements, Informal Institutions and the Negotiation of Reform," Working Papers 13681, Institute of Development Studies, International Centre for Tax and Development.
    15. Cristina Bodea & Adrienne LeBas, 2013. "The Origins of Social Contracts: Attitudes toward Taxation in Urban Nigeria," CSAE Working Paper Series 2013-02, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:98:y:2004:i:01:p:139-152_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.