IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v82y1988i02p531-548_08.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Churches as Political Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Wald, Kenneth D.
  • Owen, Dennis E.
  • Hill, Samuel S.

Abstract

Most studies of contextual influences on political attitudes and behavior have treated geographical areas as the operative social environment. As early research on social influence processes noted, the conditions that promote consensus among inhabitants of a common environment are likely to be present in formal organizations that encourage face-to-face interaction. Churches possess many of the characteristics that should maximize behavioral contagion and are thus fertile ground for the dissemination of common political outlooks. This expectation is tested by assessing the link between theological and political conservatism in 21 Protestant congregations. The theological climate in the churches is found to contribute strongly to the members' political conservatism over and above the personal commitment of respondents to traditional Christian values and a variety of social and attitudinal variables. As churches constitute the single most widespread form of voluntary organizational affiliation in the United States, their potential political impact appears to be considerable.

Suggested Citation

  • Wald, Kenneth D. & Owen, Dennis E. & Hill, Samuel S., 1988. "Churches as Political Communities," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 82(2), pages 531-548, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:82:y:1988:i:02:p:531-548_08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400085154/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brian Robert Calfano, 2010. "Prophetic at Any Price? Clergy Political Behavior and Utility Maximization," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 91(3), pages 649-668, September.
    2. Brian Robert Calfano, 2009. "Choosing Constituent Cues: Reference Group Influence on Clergy Political Speech," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 90(1), pages 88-102, March.
    3. Dorota Anna Gozdecka, 2020. "Backlash or Widening the Gap?: Women’s Reproductive Rights in the Twenty-First Century," Laws, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Jinhua Cui & Hoje Jo & Manuel Velasquez, 2015. "The Influence of Christian Religiosity on Managerial Decisions Concerning the Environment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 203-231, November.
    5. Jinhua Cui & Hoje Jo & Manuel G. Velasquez, 2016. "Community Religion, Employees, and the Social License to Operate," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(4), pages 775-807, July.
    6. Xingqiang Du, 2017. "Religious Belief, Corporate Philanthropy, and Political Involvement of Entrepreneurs in Chinese Family Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 385-406, May.
    7. Jinhua Cui & Hoje Jo & Haejung Na & Manuel Velasquez, 2015. "Workforce Diversity and Religiosity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(4), pages 743-767, June.
    8. Wozniak, Kevin H. & Lewis, Andrew R., 2010. "Reexamining the effect of christian denominational affiliation on death penalty support," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 1082-1089, September.
    9. Smith, Amy Erica, 2017. "Democratic Talk in Church: Religion and Political Socialization in the Context of Urban Inequality," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 441-451.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:82:y:1988:i:02:p:531-548_08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.