IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/agrerw/v24y1995i02p232-240_00.html

Analysis of Marketing Margins in the U.S. Lamb Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Capps, Oral
  • Byrne, Patrick J.
  • Williams, Gary W.

Abstract

Factors affecting marketing margins were identified and assessed using a relative price spread technique. Margins were disaggregated into slaughter-to-wholesale and wholesale-to-retail for a more complete understanding. Marketing costs, concentration, demand, and price were used to explain variations within these margins. Results showed that packer concentration had a significant effect on margins. Forces of supply and demand (as represented by production and market price) and changes in marketing costs also explained the variation in margins. A higher degree of price transmission from slaughter-to-wholesale level was observed in comparison to the wholesale-to-retail level.

Suggested Citation

  • Capps, Oral & Byrne, Patrick J. & Williams, Gary W., 1995. "Analysis of Marketing Margins in the U.S. Lamb Industry," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 232-240, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:24:y:1995:i:02:p:232-240_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S106828050000887X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdulkadri, Abdullahi O. & Ajibefun, Igbekele A., 2004. "An Analysis Of Farm-Retail Price Spread For Jamaican Fresh Fruits," 2004 Annual Meeting, February 14-18, 2004, Tulsa, Oklahoma 34648, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    2. Babula, Ronald A., 1997. "Economic Effects Of A Countervailing Duty Order On The U.S. Lamb Meat Industry," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 26(01), pages 1-12, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:24:y:1995:i:02:p:232-240_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/age .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.