IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cuc/eforum/v13y2023i3p40-47.html

Transformation of the principles of behavioral and management economics in the conditions of war, European integration and adaptation to climate change

Author

Listed:
  • Оleksandr Shubalyi

Abstract

The article examines the transformation of the principles of behavioral and managerial economics in the conditions of war, European integration and adaptation to climate change. The purpose of the article is to study the basic principles of behavioral economics and managerial economics, as well as to substantiate additional principles, based on which it is advisable to build economic relationships during the war and in the post-war period, taking into account the need to accelerate European integration and comply with the provisions of the concept of sustainable development. The urgency of solving this scientific problem is explained by the insufficiency of research on the characteristics of the behavior of economic entities and approaches to the justification of management decisions in the conditions of war in Ukraine. The methodological tools of the research were the provisions of the theory of behavioral economics and managerial economics. The object of the study is the behavior of economic subjects and the process of making managerial decisions in wartime conditions. The article examines the basic or traditional principles of behavioral economics and, taking into account the specifics of the functioning of the Ukrainian economy in wartime conditions, highlights additional principles (imitating the best, strengthening contacts and attachment or vice versa, self-preservation, cohesion). Similarly, in addition to the basic ones, additional principles of managerial economics are highlighted (taking into account the lost benefit, accompanying and alternative incomes, prioritizing compliance with the requirements of military, environmental and social security when justifying the feasibility of implementing projects at the local, regional and national levels, making decisions in the context of compliance with global and national priorities for the implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals by 2030 and the provisions of the European Green Deal). It was concluded that the use of the basic and additional principles of behavioral economics and managerial economics selected based on the results of the research should not be based on template approaches, but it is important that the leaders of the new formation of Ukrainian companies and state institutions put as a basis for the choice of management decisions not only maximum profit, but also took into account the associated benefits and costs

Suggested Citation

  • Оleksandr Shubalyi, 2023. "Transformation of the principles of behavioral and management economics in the conditions of war, European integration and adaptation to climate change," E-Forum Working Papers, Economic Forum, vol. 13(3), pages 40-47, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:40-47
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2308-8559-2023-3-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-forum.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/EF_N3_2023_Shubalyi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2308-8559-2023-3-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esther-Mirjam Sent, 2004. "Behavioral Economics: How Psychology Made Its (Limited) Way Back Into Economics," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 36(4), pages 735-760, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dow Alexander & Dow Sheila C., 2011. "Animal Spirits Revisited," Capitalism and Society, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Alexandre Truc, 2023. "Neuroeconomics: Hype or Hope? An Answer," Post-Print hal-04719266, HAL.
    3. Azmat, Saad & Jalil, Muhammad Naiman & Skully, Michael & Brown, Kym, 2016. "Investor’s choice of Shariah compliant ‘replicas’ and original Islamic instruments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 132(S), pages 4-22.
    4. Dorian Jullien, 2018. "Under Risk, Over Time, Regarding Other People: Language and Rationality within Three Dimensions," Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, in: Including a Symposium on Latin American Monetary Thought: Two Centuries in Search of Originality, volume 36, pages 119-155, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    5. Dorian Jullien, 2013. "Asian Disease-type of Framing of Outcomes as an Historical Curiosity," GREDEG Working Papers 2013-47, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    6. Edwards, José, 2017. "Journal of the History of Economic Thought preprints - Harry Helson’s Adaptation-Level Theory, Happiness Treadmills, and Behavioral Economics," SocArXiv 6cvbh, Center for Open Science.
    7. Alexandre Truc & Dorian Jullien, 2023. "A controversy about modeling practices: the case of inequity aversion," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 203-227, July.
    8. Hosseini, Hamid, 2011. "George Katona: A founding father of old behavioral economics," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 977-984.
    9. Guilhem Lecouteux, 2021. "Behavioral Welfare Economics and Consumer Sovereignty," Post-Print halshs-03418219, HAL.
    10. Floris Heukelom, 2011. "Behavioral Economics," Chapters, in: John B. Davis & D. Wade Hands (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Pessali, Huascar & Berger, Bruno, 2010. "A teoria da perspectiva e as mudanças de preferência no mainstream: um prospecto lakatoseano [Prospect theory and preference change in the mainstream of economics: a Lakatosian prospect]," MPRA Paper 26104, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Dorian Jullien & Alexandre Truc, 2024. "Towards a history of behavioural and experimental economics in France," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 998-1033, November.
    13. Guilhem Lecouteux, 2018. "Bayesian game theorists and non-Bayesian players," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 1420-1454, November.
    14. Anderson, Mark W. & Teisl, Mario & Noblet, Caroline, 2012. "Giving voice to the future in sustainability: Retrospective assessment to learn prospective stakeholder engagement," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1-6.
    15. Sandra Waddock, 2020. "Reframing and Transforming Economics around Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    16. John E. King, 2013. "Should post-Keynesians make a behavioural turn?," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 10(2), pages 231-242.
    17. Stavros A. Drakopoulos, 2020. "Pay Level Comparisons in Job Satisfaction Research and Mainstream Economic Methodology," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 825-842, March.
    18. Giraldo, Carlos & Giraldo, Iader & Gomez-Gonzalez, Jose E. & Uribe, Jorge M., 2025. "US uncertainty shocks, credit, production, and prices: The case of fourteen Latin American countries," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    19. Stavros A. Drakopoulos, 2025. "The Conceptual Resilience of the Atomistic Individual in Mainstream Economic Rationality," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 1-20, January.
    20. Guilhem Lecouteux, 2021. "Who's Afraid of Incoherence? Behavioural Welfare Economics and the Sovereignty of the Neoclassical Consumer," GREDEG Working Papers 2021-01, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:40-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Economic Forum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://e-forum.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.