IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v5y2020i4p404-416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Urbanism and Contextual Relativity: Insights from Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Crystal Filep

    (Urban Design Office, Wellington City Council, New Zealand)

  • Michelle Thompson-Fawcett

    (Te Iho Whenua School of Geography, University of Otago, New Zealand)

Abstract

Contextual relativities in the diversifying expression of New Urbanism are increasingly important. In this article, we explore the significance of context using a Scandinavian setting as example. We examine two embodiments of the Swedish realisation of New Urban neighbourhoods. Important in our exploration are the relationalities with contemporary contexts and belief systems, since every effort to create space becomes “an elaboration of the beliefs and values of some collection of people, expressed and fostered in their promotion of a preferred reality” (Stokowski, 2002, p. 374). The findings from the study demonstrate that the Swedish New Urban neighbourhood—no matter how meaningful as a communicative form mediating between agents and structures—cannot effect social cohesion or isolation. Rather, form communicates or evokes meaning in a variety of complex ways, suggesting the importance of “look[ing] to multiply…our readings of the city” (Leach, 1997, p. 158), particularly high-level readings that echo notions of the common good. Those concerned with New Urbanism’s embodiments should deliberate on relational fluidities and thereby strike a balance between conceptualising such urban design as either deterministically exceeding its power (Lawhon, 2009) or as side-lined to the whimsical relativity of particular consumers (Latham, 2003; Smith, 2002).

Suggested Citation

  • Crystal Filep & Michelle Thompson-Fawcett, 2020. "New Urbanism and Contextual Relativity: Insights from Sweden," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 404-416.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:5:y:2020:i:4:p:404-416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3514
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jill L. Grant, 2007. "Two sides of a coin? New urbanism and gated communities," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 481-501, January.
    2. Gordon Macleod & Craig Johnstone, 2012. "Stretching Urban Renaissance: Privatizing Space, Civilizing Place, Summoning ‘Community’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 1-28, January.
    3. Emily Talen & Sunny Menozzi & Chloe Schaefer, 2015. "What is a "Great Neighborhood"? An Analysis of APA's Top-Rated Places," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 81(2), pages 121-141, April.
    4. repec:taf:cityxx:v:11:y:2007:i:1:p:100-114 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Alan Latham, 2003. "Urbanity, Lifestyle and Making Sense of the New Urban Cultural Economy: Notes from Auckland, New Zealand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(9), pages 1699-1724, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jie Gao & Yan Song & Jiang Zhou & Dingxin Wu, 2021. "Locating New Urbanism Developments in the U.S.: Which Cities Have New Urbanism and Why?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Susan Moore & Dan Trudeau, 2020. "New Urbanism: From Exception to Norm—The Evolution of a Global Movement," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 384-387.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justus Uitermark, 2014. "Integration and Control: The Governing of Urban Marginality in Western Europe," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1418-1436, July.
    2. Antoine Paccoud, 2017. "Buy-to-let gentrification: Extending social change through tenure shifts," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 839-856, April.
    3. Robert R. Hewitt, 2014. "Globalization and Landscape Architecture," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440135, February.
    4. Suzanne Vallance, 2014. "Living on the Edge: Lessons from the Peri-urban Village," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 1954-1969, November.
    5. Dong, Hongwei, 2017. "Rail-transit-induced gentrification and the affordability paradox of TOD," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-10.
    6. Nina Martin, 2014. "Food fight! Immigrant Street Vendors, Gourmet Food Trucks and the Differential Valuation of Creative Producers in Chicago," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1867-1883, September.
    7. Eric R. Sarmiento, 2017. "Synergies in alternative food network research: embodiment, diverse economies, and more-than-human food geographies," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(2), pages 485-497, June.
    8. Jennifer Goodman & Jukka Mäkinen, 2022. "Democracy in Political Corporate Social Responsibility: A Dynamic, Multilevel Account," Post-Print hal-04002327, HAL.
    9. Andrew Gorman-Murray & Catherine Nash, 2017. "Transformations in LGBT consumer landscapes and leisure spaces in the neoliberal city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(3), pages 786-805, February.
    10. Suzanne Vallance & Harvey C. Perkins & Jacky Bowring & Jennifer E. Dixon, 2012. "Almost Invisible: Glimpsing the City and its Residents in the Urban Sustainability Discourse," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(8), pages 1695-1710, June.
    11. Manish Chalana, 2016. "Balancing History and Development in Seattle's Pike/Pine Neighborhood Conservation District," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 82(2), pages 182-184, April.
    12. Ferreira Verno & Visser Gustav, 2015. "A spatial analysis of gating in Bloemfontein, South Africa," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 28(28), pages 37-51, June.
    13. Andrew Charman & Thiresh Govender, 2020. "The Creative Night‐Time Leisure Economy of Informal Drinking Venues," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 793-808, September.
    14. Joanna Taylor & Liz Twigg & John Mohan, 2015. "Understanding neighbourhood perceptions of alcohol-related anti-social behaviour," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(12), pages 2186-2202, September.
    15. Ajay Garde, 2020. "New Urbanism: Past, Present, and Future," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 453-463.
    16. ., 2014. "Conclusion," Chapters, in: Urban Economics and Urban Policy, chapter 9, pages 221-230, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Michael Manville, 2015. "Comment on Talen et al. (2015)," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 81(4), pages 313-314, October.
    18. Van Liempt & Van Aalst, 2015. "Whose Responsibility? The Role of Bouncers in Policing the Public Spaces of Nightlife Districts," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1251-1262, November.
    19. Peer Smets, 2005. "Gated ‘communities’ - their lifestyle versus urban governance," ERSA conference papers ersa05p403, European Regional Science Association.
    20. Julian Holloway & Sheila Hones, 2007. "Muji, Materiality, and Mundane Geographies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(3), pages 555-569, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:5:y:2020:i:4:p:404-416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.