IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/buogeo/v28y2015i28p37-51n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A spatial analysis of gating in Bloemfontein, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Ferreira Verno

    (University of the Free State, Department of Geography, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein, 9300 South Africa)

  • Visser Gustav

    (University of Stellenbosch, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa)

Abstract

Growing trends of fear and insecurity in cities have sparked the re-visitation of gating, posing significant problems for citizens and policy makers alike. Gated developments are a global phenomenon occurring in diverse countries in both the developed North and developing South. Metropolitan areas in South Africa have also witnessed a rapid increase in the number and spread of gated developments since the late 1980s. Development of enclosed neighbourhoods has become increasingly popular, gaining widespread support for their utopic lifestyle and safety features. On the whole, high levels of crime and fear of crime have led to the construction of defensible space, in the form of gated developments, resulting in elevated levels of segregation. This paper provides a spatial analysis on gated developments in the non-metropolitan setting of Bloemfontein. The pattern and timeframe of gating in this city is shown to be similar to those found elsewhere in South Africa and, indeed, globally. Overall, it is the contention that gating is a trend not only seen in large metropolitan areas, but across the entire urban hierarchy of South Africa, and, as a consequence, requires investigation far beyond its metropolitan regions to more fully understand gated developments.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferreira Verno & Visser Gustav, 2015. "A spatial analysis of gating in Bloemfontein, South Africa," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 28(28), pages 37-51, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:buogeo:v:28:y:2015:i:28:p:37-51:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/bog-2015-0014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/bog-2015-0014
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/bog-2015-0014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jill L. Grant, 2007. "Two sides of a coin? New urbanism and gated communities," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 481-501, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ajay Garde, 2020. "New Urbanism: Past, Present, and Future," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 453-463.
    2. Crystal Filep & Michelle Thompson-Fawcett, 2020. "New Urbanism and Contextual Relativity: Insights from Sweden," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 404-416.
    3. Peter Aning Tedong & Wan Nor Azriyati Wan Abd Aziz & Zafirah Al-Sadat Zyed, 2021. "Planners’ Perspectives on Governing and Producing Sustainable Cities in Malaysia," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 1197-1214, February.
    4. Dan Trudeau, 2018. "Sustaining Suburbia through New Urbanism: Toward Growing, Green, and Just Suburbs?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(4), pages 50-60.
    5. Kaihuai Liao & Rainer Wehrhahn & Werner Breitung, 2019. "Urban planners and the production of gated communities in China: A structure–agency approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(13), pages 2635-2653, October.
    6. Yonn Dierwechter, 2020. "New Urbanism as Urban Political Development: Racial Geographies of ‘Intercurrence’ across Greater Seattle," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 417-428.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:buogeo:v:28:y:2015:i:28:p:37-51:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.