IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v4y2019i3p19-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Regions Shifting to Circular Economy: Understanding Challenges for New Ways of Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Obersteg

    (HafenCity, University Hamburg, Germany)

  • Alessandro Arlati

    (HafenCity, University Hamburg, Germany)

  • Arianne Acke

    (OVAM—Public Waste Agency of Flanders, Belgium)

  • Gilda Berruti

    (Department of Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, Italy)

  • Konrad Czapiewski

    (IGPZ PAN—Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Poland)

  • Marcin Dąbrowski

    (Departments of Urbanism and Management in the Built Environment, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, TU Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Erwin Heurkens

    (Departments of Urbanism and Management in the Built Environment, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, TU Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Cecília Mezei

    (MTA KRTK—Institute for Regional Studies, Hungaryu)

  • Maria Federica Palestino

    (Department of Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, Italy)

  • Viktor Varjú

    (MTA KRTK—Institute for Regional Studies, Hungary)

  • Marcin Wójcik

    (Faculty of Geographical Sciences, University of Łódź, Poland)

  • Jörg Knieling

    (HafenCity, University Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

Urban areas account for around 50% of global solid waste generation. In the last decade, the European Union has supported numerous initiatives aiming at reducing waste generation by promoting shifts towards Circular Economy (CE) approaches. Governing this process has become imperative. This article focuses on the results of a governance analysis of six urban regions in Europe involved in the Horizon 2020 project REPAiR. By means of semi-structured interviews, document analysis and workshops with local stakeholders, for each urban area a list of governance challenges which hinder the necessary shift to circularity was drafted. In order to compare the six cases, the various challenges have been categorized using the PESTEL-O method. Results highlight a significant variation in policy contexts and the need for these to evolve by adapting stakeholders’ and policy-makers’ engagement and diffusing knowledge on CE. Common challenges among the six regions include a lack of an integrated guiding framework (both political and legal), limited awareness among citizens, and technological barriers. All these elements call for a multi-faceted governance approach able to embrace the complexity of the process and comprehensively address the various challenges to completing the shift towards circularity in cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Obersteg & Alessandro Arlati & Arianne Acke & Gilda Berruti & Konrad Czapiewski & Marcin Dąbrowski & Erwin Heurkens & Cecília Mezei & Maria Federica Palestino & Viktor Varjú & Marcin Wójcik & , 2019. "Urban Regions Shifting to Circular Economy: Understanding Challenges for New Ways of Governance," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 19-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:4:y:2019:i:3:p:19-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2158
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milligan, Ben & O'Keeffe, Michelle, 2019. "Global Governance of Resources and Implications for Resource Efficiency in Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 46-58.
    2. Song, Jinbo & Sun, Yan & Jin, Lulu, 2017. "PESTEL analysis of the development of the waste-to-energy incineration industry in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 276-289.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hilde Remøy & Alexander Wandl & Denis Ceric & Arjan van Timmeren, 2019. "Facilitating Circular Economy in Urban Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 1-4.
    2. Sileryte, Rusne & Sabbe, Arnout & Bouzas, Vasileios & Meister, Kozmo & Wandl, Alexander & van Timmeren, Arjan, 2022. "European Waste Statistics data for a Circular Economy Monitor: opportunities and limitations from the Amsterdam Metropolitan Region," OSF Preprints da6f2, Center for Open Science.
    3. Vincent Augiseau & Eunhye Kim, 2021. "Inflows and Outflows from Material Stocks of Buildings and Networks and their Space-Differentiated Drivers: The Case Study of the Paris Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Nesrin Ada & Yigit Kazancoglu & Muruvvet Deniz Sezer & Cigdem Ede-Senturk & Idil Ozer & Mangey Ram, 2021. "Analyzing Barriers of Circular Food Supply Chains and Proposing Industry 4.0 Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-29, June.
    5. Julia Martínez-Cabrera & Francisco López-del-Pino, 2021. "The 10 Most Crucial Circular Economy Challenge Patterns in Tourism and the Effects of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-41, April.
    6. Vítor Domingues Martinho & Paulo Reis Mourão, 2020. "Circular Economy and Economic Development in the European Union: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    7. David Pérez-González & Gian Carlo Delgado-Ramos & Lilia Cedillo Ramírez & Rosalva Loreto López & María Elena Ramos Cassellis & José Víctor Rosendo Tamariz Flores & Ricardo Darío Peña Moreno, 2023. "Puebla City Water Supply from the Perspective of Urban Water Metabolism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-34, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kamile Petrauskiene & Jolanta Dvarioniene & Giedrius Kaveckis & Daina Kliaugaite & Julie Chenadec & Leonie Hehn & Berta Pérez & Claudio Bordi & Giorgio Scavino & Andrea Vignoli & Michael Erman, 2020. "Situation Analysis of Policies for Electric Mobility Development: Experience from Five European Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Lei Gao & Zhen-Yu Zhao, 2020. "The Evolutionary Game of Stakeholders’ Coordination Mechanism of New Energy Power Construction PPP Project: A China Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Castañeda-Ayarza, Juan Arturo & Godoi, Beatriz Araújo, 2021. "Macro-environmental influence on the development of Brazilian fuel ethanol between 1975 and 2019," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    4. Santiago Alzate-Arias & Álvaro Jaramillo-Duque & Fernando Villada & Bonie Restrepo-Cuestas, 2018. "Assessment of Government Incentives for Energy from Waste in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Michail Tsangas & Mejdi Jeguirim & Lionel Limousy & Antonis Zorpas, 2019. "The Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process in Combination with PESTEL-SWOT Analysis to Assess the Hydrocarbons Sector in Cyprus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Jae-hyuck Lee & Kyung-hee Shin & Jong-mun Park & Choong-gon Kim & Kong-jang Cho, 2021. "Subjectivity Analysis of Underground Incinerators: Focus on Academic and Industry Experts," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    7. Song, Jinbo & Nie, Rong & Yuan, Hehui & Gao, Jingxin, 2023. "Does the renovation of waste-to-energy incineration plants attenuate the housing price gradient? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in Shenzhen, China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Rafiq Muhammad Aftab & Liguo Zhang & Chih-Chun Kung, 2021. "Renewable Power Potential from Municipal Solid Waste: A Case Study in Jiangxi, China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    9. Khatiwada, Dilip & Vasudevan, Rohan Adithya & Santos, Bruno Henrique, 2022. "Decarbonization of natural gas systems in the EU – Costs, barriers, and constraints of hydrogen production with a case study in Portugal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    10. Silva, Anderson Luís da & Castañeda-Ayarza, Juan Arturo, 2021. "Macro-environment analysis of the corn ethanol fuel development in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    11. Ghaboulian Zare, Sara & Alipour, Mohammad & Hafezi, Mehdi & Stewart, Rodney A. & Rahman, Anisur, 2022. "Examining wind energy deployment pathways in complex macro-economic and political settings using a fuzzy cognitive map-based method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    12. Olivera Kostoska & Ljupco Kocarev, 2019. "A Novel ICT Framework for Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-31, April.
    13. Agyekum, Ephraim Bonah & Amjad, Fahd & Mohsin, Muhammad & Ansah, Michael Nii Sanka, 2021. "A bird's eye view of Ghana's renewable energy sector environment: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making approach," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Bai, Wuliyasu & Zhang, Long & Lu, Shengfang & Ren, Jingzheng & Zhou, Zhiqiao, 2023. "Sustainable energy transition in Southeast Asia: Energy status analysis, comprehensive evaluation and influential factor identification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    15. Lei Gao & Zhen-Yu Zhao, 2018. "System Dynamics Analysis of Evolutionary Game Strategies between the Government and Investors Based on New Energy Power Construction Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Shervin Zakeri & Dimitri Konstantas & Naoufel Cheikhrouhou, 2022. "The Grey Ten-Element Analysis Method: A Novel Strategic Analysis Tool," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Charis Vlados & Dimos Chatzinikolaou, 2020. "Methodological Redirections for an Evolutionary Approach of the External Business Environment," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(2), pages 1-25, March.
    18. Song, Malin & Xie, Qianjiao & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Yao, Xin, 2023. "Economic growth and security from the perspective of natural resource assets," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    19. Qiuchen Wang & Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2019. "Adopting an Actor Analysis Framework to a Complex Technology Innovation Project: A Case Study of an Electric Road System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-35, December.
    20. Dilip Khatiwada & Pallav Purohit, 2021. "Special Issue on Assessing the Modern Bioenergy Potential and Strategies for Sustainable Development: Transformations through Nexus, Policy, and Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-5, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:4:y:2019:i:3:p:19-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.