IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v1y2016i4p1-5.html

The Death and Life of Collaborative Planning Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Goodspeed

    (University of Michigan, USA)

Abstract

It has been over 20 years since Judith Innes proclaimed communicative action to be the “emerging paradigm” for planning theory, a theoretical perspective which has been developed into what is known as collaborative planning theory (CPT). With planning theory shifting to a new generation of scholars, this commentary considers the fate of this intellectual movement within planning. CPT never achieved the paradigmatic status its advocates desired because of its internal diversity and limited scope. However, its useful combination of analytical and normative insights is attracting the interest of a new generation of researchers, who are subjecting it to rigorous empirical testing and addressing longstanding theoretical weaknesses. Like Jane Jacob’s classic book the Death and Life of Great American Cities, CPT has made an enduring impact on planning theory, even as it has failed to achieve a total revolution in thinking.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Goodspeed, 2016. "The Death and Life of Collaborative Planning Theory," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(4), pages 1-5.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v1:y:2016:i:4:p:1-5
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v1i4.715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/715
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v1i4.715?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Goodspeed, 2016. "Digital knowledge technologies in planning practice: from black boxes to media for collaborative inquiry," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 577-600, October.
    2. John F. Forester, 1999. "The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262561220, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Goodspeed & Cassie Hackel, 2019. "Lessons for developing a planning support system infrastructure: The case of Southern California's Scenario Planning Model," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(4), pages 777-796, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Goodspeed, 2016. "The Death and Life of Collaborative Planning Theory," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(4), pages 1-5.
    2. Reusser, Dominik E. & Loukopoulos, Peter & Stauffacher, Michael & Scholz, Roland W., 2008. "Classifying railway stations for sustainable transitions – balancing node and place functions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 191-202.
    3. E. Melanie DuPuis & Brian J. Gareau, 2008. "Neoliberal Knowledge: The Decline of Technocracy and the Weakening of the Montreal Protocol," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 89(5), pages 1212-1229, December.
    4. Dian Nostikasari & Nicole Foster & Lauren Krake, 2024. "Inhabiting digital spaces: An informational right to the city for mobility justice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(13), pages 2585-2602, October.
    5. Carla Oonk & Judith Gulikers & Martin Mulder, 2016. "Educating collaborative planners: strengthening evidence for the learning potential of multi-stakeholder regional learning environments," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 533-551, October.
    6. Makena Coffman & Karen Umemoto, 2010. "The triple-bottom-line: framing of trade-offs in sustainability planning practice," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 12(5), pages 597-610, October.
    7. te Brömmelstroet, Marco, 2017. "Towards a pragmatic research agenda for the PSS domain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 77-83.
    8. Primmer, Eeva & Kyllonen, Simo, 2006. "Goals for public participation implied by sustainable development, and the preparatory process of the Finnish National Forest Programme," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(8), pages 838-853, November.
    9. Juval Portugali & Nurit Alfasi, 2008. "An Approach to Planning Discourse Analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(2), pages 251-272, February.
    10. Muhammad Taufiq & Suhirman Suhirman & Tubagus Furqon Sofhani & Benedictus Kombaitan, 2022. "Power dynamics in collaborative rural planning: The case of Pematang Tengah, Indonesia," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(7), pages 1515-1534, November.
    11. Ana Guzmán Ruiz & Meredith Dobbie & Rebekah Brown, 2017. "Insights and future directions of transdisciplinary practice in the urban water sector," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 7(2), pages 251-263, June.
    12. Marleau Donais, Francis & Abi-Zeid, Irène & Waygood, E. Owen D. & Lavoie, Roxane, 2022. "Municipal decision-making for sustainable transportation: Towards improving current practices for street rejuvenation in Canada," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 152-170.
    13. Shivanand Balram & Suzana Dragicevic & Thomas Meredith, 2003. "Achieving Effectiveness in Stakeholder Participation Using the GIS-Based Collaborative Spatial Delphi Methodology," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 365-394.
    14. Lara, Jesus J., 2020. "Problem-Based solutions from the classroom to the Community: Transformative approaches to mitigate the impacts of boom-and-bust in declining urban communities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    15. Liz Barry, 2022. "Community science and the design of climate governance," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 1-17, April.
    16. Davies-Colley, Christian & Smith, Willie, 2012. "Implementing environmental technologies in development situations: The example of ecological toilets," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-8.
    17. Caroline Brown & Jean-Paul Rodrigue & Peter Keenan & Cindy Regalado & Chris Perkins & Fulong Wu, 2012. "Review: Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age?, a Dictionary of Transport Analysis, Spatial Decision Support Systems, Geographic Information Science and Public Participation, Making Maps: A Visual Guide to Map Desi," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 39(2), pages 406-412, April.
    18. Dave Valler & Malcolm Tait & Tim Marshall, 2013. "Business and Planning: A Strategic-Relational Approach," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 143-167, May.
    19. George C. Homsy, 2018. "Unlikely pioneers: creative climate change policymaking in smaller U.S. cities," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(2), pages 121-131, June.
    20. Ahmed Z. Khan & Frank Moulaert & Jan Schreurs & Konrad Miciukiewicz, 2014. "Integrative Spatial Quality: A Relational Epistemology of Space and Transdisciplinarity in Urban Design and Planning," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 393-411, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v1:y:2016:i:4:p:1-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.