IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v11y2026a11075.html

Does Compactness Matter? Comparative Study of Medium‐Sized Shrinking Cities’ Compactness in Germany and Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Ewa Szymczyk

    (Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Cracow University of Technology, Poland / AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Austria)

  • Mateusz Bukowski

    (Faculty of Computer Science, AGH University of Krakow, Poland)

  • Andrzej Tomski

    (Faculty of Mathematics, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

Urban shrinkage is an increasingly pressing phenomenon in Europe, affecting medium‐sized cities that are vital to regional stability. However, large‐scale, longitudinal research on the relationship between urban form characteristics and shrinkage remains limited. This study examines whether urban compactness influences the trajectory of shrinking cities by comparing all medium‐sized cities (20,000–100,000 inhabitants) in Germany and Poland over 15 years. Using geospatial tools and multi‐criteria indicators, we quantify urban shrinkage through a composite score and assess urban form compactness based on CORINE Land Cover data, employing two measures: urban population density and the Schwartzberg compactness index. Pearson’s correlation analysis is used to examine how the relationship between urban shrinkage and compactness evolves over time. The findings indicate that medium‐sized German cities show a clear and consistent negative correlation between urban shrinkage and the two compactness measures throughout the period. In other words, the more compact and dense a medium‐sized city is, the less likely it is to shrink. Polish cities exhibit more mixed trends. The correlation results show that there is a temporal positive coefficient between shrinkage and density, but a negative correlation between compactness measures and shrinkage. Overall, results suggest that urban compactness, among other factors, can play an important role in medium‐sized cities’ shrinkage management. This study identifies patterns in medium‐sized cities in both countries regarding compactness and shrinkage trends, supporting cross‐national knowledge exchange and the development of context‐sensitive planning strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ewa Szymczyk & Mateusz Bukowski & Andrzej Tomski, 2026. "Does Compactness Matter? Comparative Study of Medium‐Sized Shrinking Cities’ Compactness in Germany and Poland," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v11:y:2026:a:11075
    DOI: 10.17645/up.11075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/11075
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.11075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Justin B. Hollander & Jeremy Németh, 2011. "The bounds of smart decline: a foundational theory for planning shrinking cities," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 349-367, June.
    2. Yupeng Wang & Hiroatsu Fukuda, 2019. "Sustainable Urban Regeneration for Shrinking Cities: A Case from Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Min Wang & Shuqi Yang & Huajie Gao & Kahaer Abudu, 2021. "The Characteristics, Influencing Factors, and Push-Pull Mechanism of Shrinking Counties: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Ma, Fengdi & Yoon, Heeyeun, 2025. "Urban shrinkage and its drivers: time-series clustering and a panel model of Chinese cities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Wenshi Yang & Fan Chen & Qianqian Wei & Zhenwei Peng, 2024. "Relationships between Resident Activities and Physical Space in Shrinking Cities in China—The Case of Chaoyang City," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Zezhou Wu & Danting Zhang & Shenghan Li & Jianbo Fei & Changhong Chen & Bin Tian & Maxwell Fordjour Antwi-Afari, 2022. "Visualizing and Understanding Shrinking Cities and Towns (SCT) Research: A Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Dries Couckuyt & Toshi H. Arimura & Takuro Miyamoto & Naonari Yajima, 2023. "Green Policymaking in Japanese Municipalities: An Empirical Study on External and Internal Contextual Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    6. Khairul Hisyam Kamarudin & Hu Jianke & Mohamad Fadhli Rashid & Nadzirah Hosen, 2025. "Smart Shrinkage Strategies for Rural Economic and Settlement Revitalisation in China," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3), pages 453-465, March.
    7. Güldem Özatağan & Ayda Eraydin, 2021. "Emerging policy responses in shrinking cities: Shifting policy agendas to align with growth machine politics," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(5), pages 1096-1114, August.
    8. Haruka Kato, 2020. "How Does the Location of Urban Facilities Affect the Forecasted Population Change in the Osaka Metropolitan Fringe Area?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Chahardowli, Mehrdad & Sajadzadeh, Hassan, 2022. "A strategic development model for regeneration of urban historical cores: A case study of the historical fabric of Hamedan City," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. Emily Rosenman & Samuel Walker, 2016. "Tearing down the city to save it? ‘Back-door regionalism’ and the demolition coalition in Cleveland, Ohio," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(2), pages 273-291, February.
    11. David Bogataj & Marija Bogataj & Samo Drobne, 2020. "Sustainability of an Activity Node in Global Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Prener, Chris & Braswell, Taylor & Monti, Daniel J., 2018. "St. Louis's "Urban Prairie": Vacant Land and the Potential for Revitalization," SocArXiv bc7eh, Center for Open Science.
    13. Jason Hackworth, 2015. "Rightsizing as Spatial Austerity in the American Rust Belt," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(4), pages 766-782, April.
    14. Linggui Liu & Han Lyu & Yi Zhao & Dian Zhou, 2022. "An Improved Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (2SFCA) Method for Measuring Spatial Accessibility to Elderly Care Facilities in Xi’an, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-15, September.
    15. repec:osf:socarx:bc7eh_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Jason Hackworth, 2016. "Demolition as urban policy in the American Rust Belt," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(11), pages 2201-2222, November.
    17. Ruiying Liu, 2022. "Long-Term Development Perspectives in the Slow Crisis of Shrinkage: Strategies of Coping and Exiting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-30, August.
    18. Iwona Kantor-Pietraga, 2021. "Does One Decade of Urban Policy for the Shrinking City Make Visible Progress in Urban Re-Urbanization? A Case Study of Bytom, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Shangkun Yu & Ruili Wang & Xuejie Zhang & Yi Miao & Chengxin Wang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urban Shrinkage and Its Impact on Urban Resilience in Three Provinces of Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, July.
    20. Bin Du & Ying Wang & Jiaxin He & Wai Li & Xiaohong Chen, 2021. "Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Obstacle Factors of the Urban-Rural Integration of China’s Shrinking Cities in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    21. Bozhko, L. L., 2017. "Government support for monotowns in the Republic of Kazakhstan," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 3(1), pages 1-11.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v11:y:2026:a:11075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.