IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v1y2013i2p104-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political Limits to the Processing of Policy Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Peter J. May

    (Center for American Politics and Public Policy, Department of Political Science, University of Washington, 101 Gowen Hall, Campus Box 353530, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

  • Ashley E. Jochim

    (Center on Reinventing Public Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA)

  • Barry Pump

    (Office of the Historian, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC 20515, USA)

Abstract

This contribution addresses political limits to the processing of policy problems in the United States. Our foci are the forces that limit policymakers' attention to different aspects of problems and how this affects the prospects for problem resolution. We theorize about three sets of forces: interest engagement, linkages among relevant institutions for policymaking, and partisan conflict. We show how the interplay of these forces limits efforts to address complex problems. Based on secondary accounts, we consider these underlying dynamics for ten complex problems. These include the thorny problems of the financial crisis, climate change, and health care; the persistent problems of K-12 education, drug abuse, and food safety; and the looming problems associated with critical infrastructure, the obesity epidemic, ocean health, and terrorism and extreme events. From these accounts we identify different patterns that we label fractured, allied, bureaucratic, and anemic policymaking.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter J. May & Ashley E. Jochim & Barry Pump, 2013. "Political Limits to the Processing of Policy Problems," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 104-116.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:1:y:2013:i:2:p:104-116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/98
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myriam Dunn, 2005. "The socio-political dimensions of critical information infrastructure protection (CIIP)," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(2/3), pages 258-268.
    2. repec:reg:rpubli:219 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iris Wanzenböck & Joeri H Wesseling & Koen Frenken & Marko P Hekkert & K Matthias Weber, 0. "A framework for mission-oriented innovation policy: Alternative pathways through the problem–solution space," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 47(4), pages 474-489.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ebrahim Bagheri & Ali A. Ghorbani, 2010. "UML-CI: A reference model for profiling critical infrastructure systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 115-139, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:1:y:2013:i:2:p:104-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.