IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v11y2023i2p293-304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civil Society Versus Local Self‐Governments and Central Government in V4 Countries: The Case of Co‐Creation

Author

Listed:
  • Michal Plaček

    (Faculty of Social Science, Charles University, Czech Republic)

  • Juraj Nemec

    (Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Czech Republic)

  • Mária Murray Svidroňová

    (Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University, Slovakia)

  • Paweł Mikołajczak

    (Institute of Finance, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland)

  • Éva Kovács

    (Institute of Social and Political Sciences, Corvinus University, Hungary / Lajos Lőrincz Department of Administrative Law, University of Public Service, Hungary)

Abstract

In the new EU member states, there are very few studies analyzing the role of central and local self-governments in co-design processes. Nevertheless, such studies are particularly important as co-creation takes place in the context of former post-communist countries where central power reigned supreme and cooperation with the civil sector was very limited. This article aims to enrich the existing debate on the role of central and local self-government in the context of co-creation at the local level—specifically to map the extent to which local and central governments in the Visegrad Four region (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia) support local participatory budgeting initiatives as one of the most important forms of co-creation. The findings are very interesting, as each country has its situation and specificities. The (positive but also negative) role of the central state is limited but not invisible, except in the Czech Republic. The relations between civil society (and formal NGOs) and local self-governments are somewhat more similar within the countries studied. At the beginning of participatory budgeting, the civil sector and NGOs served as initiators and local self-governments as followers. However, this position has been steadily shifting towards the dominance of local self-governments and the marginalization of the civil society’s role.

Suggested Citation

  • Michal Plaček & Juraj Nemec & Mária Murray Svidroňová & Paweł Mikołajczak & Éva Kovács, 2023. "Civil Society Versus Local Self‐Governments and Central Government in V4 Countries: The Case of Co‐Creation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 293-304.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:293-304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6282
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michal Placek & Gabriela Vacekova & Maria Murray Svidronova & Juraj Nemec & Gabriela Korimova, 2021. "The evolutionary trajectory of social enterprises in the Czech Republic and Slovakia," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 775-794, May.
    2. Stephen P. Osborne, 2018. "From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 225-231, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antje Daniel & Hans-Joachim Lauth & Eberhard Rothfuß, 2023. "Local Self‐Governance and Weak Statehood: A Convincing Liaison?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 272-279.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Best, Bernadette & Miller, Kristel & McAdam, Rodney & Maalaoui, Adnane, 2022. "Business model innovation within SPOs: Exploring the antecedents and mechanisms facilitating multi-level value co-creation within a value-network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 475-494.
    2. Benoit Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "L'innovation dans les services publics à la lumière des paradigmes de l'administration publique et des perspectives des Service Innovation Studies," Working Papers halshs-01934287, HAL.
    3. Laura Carmouze & Christophe Alaux & Fouchet Robert, 2021. "Co-construire les services publics locaux : une approche stratégique de la participation des parties prenantes externes. Cas de l’analyse des besoins sociaux dans des centres communaux d’action social," Post-Print hal-04188705, HAL.
    4. Minerva Martínez Avila & Juan José García-Machado & Eréndira Fierro Moreno, 2021. "A Multiple Full Mediating Effect in a PLS Hierarchical Component Model: Application to the Collaborative Public Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    6. Mikołajczak, Paweł, 2022. "Determinants of precarious employment in social enterprises in Central and Eastern Europe," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 398-408.
    7. Diego Cagigas & Judith Clifton & Daniel Díaz-Fuentes & Marcos Fernández-Gutiérrez & Juan Echevarría-Cuenca & Celia Gilsanz-Gómez, 2022. "Explaining public officials’ opinions on blockchain adoption: a vignette experiment [Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(3), pages 343-357.
    8. Yue Wang & Honggen Zhu & Noshaba Aziz & Yu Liu, 2023. "Does Social Capital Improve the Effectiveness of Public Service? An Insight from Rural-to-Urban Migrants in China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 431-452, January.
    9. Rocco Palumbo & Stefania Vezzosi & Paola Picciolli & Alessandro Landini & Carmela Annarumma & Rosalba Manna, 2018. "Fostering organizational change through co-production. Insights from an Italian experience," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 371-391, September.
    10. Floriana Fusco & Marta Marsilio & Chiara Guglielmetti, 2018. "La co-production in sanit?: un?analisi bibliometrica," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(108), pages 35-54.
    11. Döring, Matthias, 2020. "“Explain, but make no Excuses”: Service Recovery after Public Service Failures," SocArXiv txmdy, Center for Open Science.
    12. Antonia Sorge & Letizia De Luca & Giancarlo Tamanza & Emanuela Saita, 2021. "Ward Staff as a Tool to Promote Wellbeing among Prison Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-27, September.
    13. Alberto Peralta & Luis Rubalcaba, 2021. "A Metagovernance Model of Innovation Networks in the Health and Social Services Using a Neo-Schumpeterian Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-23, June.
    14. Florence Jany‐Catrice, 2022. "A political economy of social impact measurement," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(2), pages 267-291, June.
    15. Camilla Ihlebæk & Camilla Castellan & Jenny Flobak & Jo Ese, 2021. "The School as an Arena for Co-Creating Participation, Equity, and Well-Being—A Photovoice Study from Norway," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-15, August.
    16. Plaček, Michal & del Campo, Cristina & Valentinov, Vladislav & Vaceková, Gabriela & Šumpíková, Markéta & Ochrana, František, 2022. "Gender heterogeneity and politics in decision-making about green public procurement in the Czech Republic," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(3), pages 239-250.
    17. Vasilios P. Andrikopoulos & Amalia Α. Ifanti, 2020. "New Public Management and Governance: Quo Vadis?," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 430442-4304, December.
    18. Florence JANY-CATRICE, 2020. "Une économie politique des mesures d’impact social," CIRIEC Working Papers 2014, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    19. Paolo Esposito & Paolo Ricci & Alessandro Sancino, 2021. "Leading for social change: Waste management in the place of social (ir)responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 667-674, March.
    20. Vieira, Alessandro Diogo & Leite, Higor & Volochtchuk, Ana Vitória Lachowski, 2022. "The impact of voice assistant home devices on people with disabilities: A longitudinal study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:293-304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.