IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v11y2023i2p293-304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civil Society Versus Local Self‐Governments and Central Government in V4 Countries: The Case of Co‐Creation

Author

Listed:
  • Michal Plaček

    (Faculty of Social Science, Charles University, Czech Republic)

  • Juraj Nemec

    (Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Czech Republic)

  • Mária Murray Svidroňová

    (Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University, Slovakia)

  • Paweł Mikołajczak

    (Institute of Finance, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland)

  • Éva Kovács

    (Institute of Social and Political Sciences, Corvinus University, Hungary / Lajos Lőrincz Department of Administrative Law, University of Public Service, Hungary)

Abstract

In the new EU member states, there are very few studies analyzing the role of central and local self-governments in co-design processes. Nevertheless, such studies are particularly important as co-creation takes place in the context of former post-communist countries where central power reigned supreme and cooperation with the civil sector was very limited. This article aims to enrich the existing debate on the role of central and local self-government in the context of co-creation at the local level—specifically to map the extent to which local and central governments in the Visegrad Four region (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia) support local participatory budgeting initiatives as one of the most important forms of co-creation. The findings are very interesting, as each country has its situation and specificities. The (positive but also negative) role of the central state is limited but not invisible, except in the Czech Republic. The relations between civil society (and formal NGOs) and local self-governments are somewhat more similar within the countries studied. At the beginning of participatory budgeting, the civil sector and NGOs served as initiators and local self-governments as followers. However, this position has been steadily shifting towards the dominance of local self-governments and the marginalization of the civil society’s role.

Suggested Citation

  • Michal Plaček & Juraj Nemec & Mária Murray Svidroňová & Paweł Mikołajczak & Éva Kovács, 2023. "Civil Society Versus Local Self‐Governments and Central Government in V4 Countries: The Case of Co‐Creation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 293-304.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v11:y:2023:i:2:p:293-304
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.v11i2.6282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6282
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6282?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michal Placek & Gabriela Vacekova & Maria Murray Svidronova & Juraj Nemec & Gabriela Korimova, 2021. "The evolutionary trajectory of social enterprises in the Czech Republic and Slovakia," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 775-794, May.
    2. Stephen P. Osborne, 2018. "From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 225-231, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michal Plaček & Juraj Nemec & Mária Murray Svidroňová & Paweł Mikołajczak & Éva Kovács, 2023. "Civil Society Versus Local Self‐Governments and Central Government in V4 Countries: The Case of Co‐Creation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 293-304.
    2. Yuxiang Chris Zhao & Jingwen Lian & Yan Zhang & Shijie Song & Xinlin Yao, 2024. "Value co‐creation in cultural heritage information practices: Literature review and future agenda: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(3), pages 298-323, March.
    3. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    4. Mikołajczak, Paweł, 2022. "Determinants of precarious employment in social enterprises in Central and Eastern Europe," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 398-408.
    5. Siu-yau Lee & Isabella F. S. Ng & Hanyu Xiao, 2024. "A New Survey Instrument for Tracking Public Opinion on Social Inclusion," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 677-699, January.
    6. Diego Cagigas & Judith Clifton & Daniel Díaz-Fuentes & Marcos Fernández-Gutiérrez & Juan Echevarría-Cuenca & Celia Gilsanz-Gómez, 2022. "Explaining public officials’ opinions on blockchain adoption: a vignette experiment [Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(3), pages 343-357.
    7. Floriana Fusco & Marta Marsilio & Chiara Guglielmetti, 2018. "La co-production in sanit?: un?analisi bibliometrica," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(108), pages 35-54.
    8. Antonia Sorge & Letizia De Luca & Giancarlo Tamanza & Emanuela Saita, 2021. "Ward Staff as a Tool to Promote Wellbeing among Prison Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-27, September.
    9. Florence Jany‐Catrice, 2022. "A political economy of social impact measurement," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(2), pages 267-291, June.
    10. Camilla Ihlebæk & Camilla Castellan & Jenny Flobak & Jo Ese, 2021. "The School as an Arena for Co-Creating Participation, Equity, and Well-Being—A Photovoice Study from Norway," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Plaček, Michal & del Campo, Cristina & Valentinov, Vladislav & Vaceková, Gabriela & Šumpíková, Markéta & Ochrana, František, 2022. "Gender heterogeneity and politics in decision-making about green public procurement in the Czech Republic," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(3), pages 239-250.
    12. Lutz Preuss & Isabel Fischer & Bimal Arora, 2024. "How do stakeholder groups make sense of sustainability: Analysing differences in the complexity of their cognitive frames," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2367-2383, March.
    13. Florence JANY-CATRICE, 2020. "Une économie politique des mesures d’impact social," CIRIEC Working Papers 2014, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    14. Paolo Esposito & Paolo Ricci & Alessandro Sancino, 2021. "Leading for social change: Waste management in the place of social (ir)responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 667-674, March.
    15. Vieira, Alessandro Diogo & Leite, Higor & Volochtchuk, Ana Vitória Lachowski, 2022. "The impact of voice assistant home devices on people with disabilities: A longitudinal study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    16. Anna Francesca Pattaro & Marco Ranuzzini & Luca Bonacini, 2019. "Inter-municipal cooperation as a solution for public services delivery? The case of Unioni di Comuni in Emilia-Romagna Region," Department of Economics 0144, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    17. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Innovation in public services in the light of public administration paradigms and service innovation perspectives," Working Papers halshs-01934280, HAL.
    18. Ferry, Laurence & Wegorowski, Piotr & Andrews, Rhys, 2024. "Hybridity, institutional logics and value creation mechanisms in the corporatisation of social care," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).
    19. Cosimato, Silvia & Faggini, Marisa & Prete, Marzia del, 2021. "The co-creation of value for pursuing a sustainable happiness: The analysis of an Italian prison community," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    20. repec:osf:socarx:txmdy_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Ya-Lan Chin & Feng-Shang Wu & Jian-Bing Liu & Yan Li & Jin Wang, 2024. "Exploring the role of interaction in older-adult service innovation: insights from the testing stage," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v11:y:2023:i:2:p:293-304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.