IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v14y2026a11281.html

The Romantic Workplace: How Coworking Spaces Drive Post-Digital Consumption

Author

Listed:
  • André Jansson

    (Department of Geography, Media and Communication, Karlstad University, Sweden)

  • Karin Fast

    (Department of Geography, Media and Communication, Karlstad University, Sweden)

  • Magnus Andersson

    (School of Arts and Communication, Malmö University, Sweden)

Abstract

Society and culture are increasingly marked by post-digital developments where the normalization of digital connectivity is challenged both through critical resistance, e.g., digital disconnection practices, and in commercial discourses on, e.g., “digital wellbeing” and “digital detox.” This article seeks to understand such post-digital trends in working life through the lens of romantic ideals. In modern history, the Romantic ethic implied an escape into the beautiful, the genuine, and the sublime. While constituting a counter-force to functionalism, it also shaped the evolution of modern consumerism through the embracing of novelty and imagination. Here, the analytical focus is on coworking spaces (CWS), a form of digitally reliant workspaces where mobile workers can rent a desk or an office for a limited period of time and where disconnection and non-digital features are promoted as ingredients of “good work.” Previous research shows that many CWS, while promoted as consumable destinations, function as anchoring places and environments for gaining a sense of presence and peace under digitally networked conditions. The current analysis extends these arguments through a case study of a CWS in an early-gentrifying part of Oslo, Norway. Based on ethnographic observations and interviews, the article shows how four romantic tropes—novelty, authenticity, creativity, and harmony—saturate spatial production as well as the mindsets of coworkers. It is concluded that CWS form part of a neo-romantic movement that includes a plethora of related post-digital phenomena, together constituting a counter-culture within capitalist consumer society.

Suggested Citation

  • André Jansson & Karin Fast & Magnus Andersson, 2026. "The Romantic Workplace: How Coworking Spaces Drive Post-Digital Consumption," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v14:y:2026:a:11281
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.11281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/11281
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.11281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adèle Gruen-Martin & Fleura Bardhi, 2025. "Consumptive Work in Coworking: Using Consumption Strategically for Work," Post-Print hal-05322187, HAL.
    2. Appel-Meulenbroek, Rianne & Weijs-Perrée, Minou & Orel, Marko & Gauger, Felix & Pfnür, Andreas, 2021. "User preferences for coworking spaces; a comparison between the Netherlands, Germany and the Czech Republic," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 122646, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Giorgia Bondanini & Cristina Giovanelli & Nicola Mucci & Gabriele Giorgi, 2025. "The Dual Impact of Digital Connectivity: Balancing Productivity and Well-Being in the Modern Workplace," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(6), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Carina Guyard & Anne Kaun, 2018. "Workfulness: governing the disobedient brain," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(6), pages 535-548, November.
    5. Adèle Gruen & Fleura Bardhi, 2025. "Consumptive Work in Coworking: Using Consumption Strategically for Work," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 52(4), pages 663-686.
    6. Rianne Appel-Meulenbroek & Minou Weijs-Perrée & Marko Orel & Felix Gauger & Andreas Pfnür, 2021. "User preferences for coworking spaces; a comparison between the Netherlands, Germany and the Czech Republic," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 2025-2048, October.
    7. Paul C. Adams & André Jansson, 2023. "Postdigital Territoriality: Disentangling from Digital Media as a Return to Place," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(3), pages 658-674, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schnell, Lukas & Berger, Elisabeth S.C., 2025. "Sharing and exchange dynamics in entrepreneurial spaces: a systematic literature review and conceptualization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    2. Giuseppina Dell’Aversana & Massimo Miglioretti, 2025. "Coworking spaces for remote workers: an inclusive solution? Advantages and challenges from affiliated workers’ perspectives," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1131-1160, April.
    3. Yujie Zhang & Qian Zhang, 2026. "Navigating the Invisible: Ironic Compliance, Forced Labor, and the Commodification of Offline Rights in Digitalized Workplaces," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 55-72, January.
    4. Martin Christian Höcker & Yassien Bachtal & Andreas Pfnür, 2022. "Work from home: bane or blessing? Implications for corporate real estate strategies [Work from Home: Fluch oder Segen? Implikationen für das betriebliche Immobilienmanagement]," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 8(2), pages 101-137, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v14:y:2026:a:11281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.