IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Das deutsche Gesundheitswesen: Reformvorstellungen der politischen Parteien und der Gesundheitsökonomen

Listed author(s):
  • Rigmar Osterkamp
Registered author(s):

    Unstrittig ist, dass das deutsche Gesundheitswesen dringender Reformen bedarf. Die Meinungen in der Politik, bei den Interessengruppen und in der Wissenschaft darüber, wo die Reformen ansetzen und in welche Richtung sie gehen sollen, divergieren aber erheblich, zum Teil sind die Unterschiede fundamental. Daher erscheint es zu Beginn der Legislaturperiode angebracht, die Probleme des deutschen Gesundheitswesens noch einmal zusammenfassend darzustellen, sie durch Beispiele sowie durch die Angabe (einiger) ihrer Ursachen zu charakterisieren und die Reformvorschläge bzw. Reformvorhaben der relevanten politischen Parteien mit den Vorschlägen von Gesundheitsökonomen zu vergleichen.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich in its journal ifo Schnelldienst.

    Volume (Year): 55 (2002)
    Issue (Month): 18 (09)
    Pages: 21-29

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:55:y:2002:i:18:p:21-29
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Poschingerstr. 5, 81679 München

    Phone: +49-89-9224-0
    Fax: +49-89-985369
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Rigmar Osterkamp, 2001. "The German Health Care System in an International Comparison: Assessments and Reform Options," CESifo Forum, Ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 2(3), pages 56-63, 02.
    2. Rigmar Osterkamp, 2002. "Warten auf Operationen - ein internationaler Vergleich," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 55(10), pages 14-21, 05.
    3. Dieter Cassel, 2001. "Das deutsche Gesundheitswesen in der Dauerkrise - fehlt der Mut zu radikalen Reformen?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 54(16), pages 03-07, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:55:y:2002:i:18:p:21-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Klaus Wohlrabe)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.