IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v55y2002i05p3-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PISA Study: Has the German educational system failed?

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Hohlmeier
  • Manfred Prenzel
  • Andreas Schleicher
  • Reinar Lüdeke
  • Eva-Maria Stange

Abstract

The results of the 2000 PISA Study 2000 were a great disappointment for Germany. In all tested fields of the study the performance of the German pupils who participated was far below the mean of the total results. For Monika Hohlmeier, Bavarian State Minister for Education and Culture, the causes are not only to be found in the schools. They are also result of overall social trends. For Prof. Manfred Prenzel, Keil University, the reasons are that in comparison with "other countries Germany has made little progress in pedagogical methods. If we speak of a failure of the German educational system, it consists in having complacently ignored new trends". For Prof. Andreas Schleicher, OECD, a major deficiency of the German educational system consists in the insufficient integration of the education institutions and the deficient transparency of the educational system. In the opinion of Prof. Reinar Luedeke, Passau University, it would be beneficial "to assign more importance to the market in education to enhance the discovery process". Dr. Eva-Maria Stange, Chairperson of the GEW education union, calls for "a fundamental re-thinking of the German educational system. Encouragement instead of selection that should characterise the paradigm change".

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Hohlmeier & Manfred Prenzel & Andreas Schleicher & Reinar Lüdeke & Eva-Maria Stange, 2002. "PISA Study: Has the German educational system failed?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 55(05), pages 3-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:55:y:2002:i:05:p:3-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2002_5_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:55:y:2002:i:05:p:3-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.