IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/epofor/v23y2022i06p4-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Whither the Liberal European Union Energy Model? The Public Policy Consequences of Russia’s Weaponization of Energy

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Goldthau
  • Nick Sitter

Abstract

Energy is primarily a private good but also has public goods characteristics. The EU’s traditional strategy to cater to the strategic goods element – energy security – was the liberal market model The Ukraine crisis has fundamentally put the liberal model in question. The present EU measures are deeply interventionist Renewables are elevated to matters of national interest. Combined with massive public funds, this accelerates the clean transition and is likely to put structural breaks into the incumbent energy system Going forward, the EU has three options: a return to the status quo ante (the liberal model); a more robust “public interest” model accounting for the risk of high political costs; and a Colbertist model putting the state in charge of managing markets and the clean transition The Ukraine crisis highlights each model’s political and economic trade-offs. Policy priorities and strategies need to be revisited in light of these trade-offs. This is a watershed moment in European energy policy

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Goldthau & Nick Sitter, 2022. "Whither the Liberal European Union Energy Model? The Public Policy Consequences of Russia’s Weaponization of Energy," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 23(06), pages 4-7, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:epofor:v:23:y:2022:i:06:p:4-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/econpol-forum-2022-6-goldthau-sitter-eu-energy-model.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Filippos Proedrou, 2023. "EU Decarbonization under Geopolitical Pressure: Changing Paradigms and Implications for Energy and Climate Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:epofor:v:23:y:2022:i:06:p:4-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.