IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ceh/journl/y2025v10p364-373.html

Wartime Impact over the Monastic Economics in Bulgaria (1913–1930). The Case of Bachkovo Monastery

Author

Listed:
  • Nikolay Atanasov

    (Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria)

Abstract

Wars for unification impose optimization of public sources. This politics reflects over the Bulgarian Orthodox Church. State calls the Holy Synod to sow all available lands to meet the needs of the population in the approaching days of the First World War. For this purpose, a fund is being established at the Holy Synod, which aims to modernize and optimize the monastic farms. Despite the difficult years of the war, sums are being allocated, which enable the development of the social, cultural and charitable activities, as well as for the development of the monastery farms themselves. After the end of the First World War the Regime of Alexander Stamboliyski is established, which has two important targets – the first, to satisfy the needs for land of landless and poor population in the country and the second one, to ensure livelihood for the large wave of refugees, that is seeking of shelter. As a result of the agrarian reform undertaken in 1921 lands were expropriated, which constitute a state fund for the needs of poor. This politics affects also the monastic lands that are not modernized and are not cultivated. The subsequent political regime of the government of ninth of June, this politics is reinforced by another law in the same direction in 1924. This law notes that lands that are occupied by intensive crops and are included in a cultivation plan would not be subject to expropriation. These policies put the Bulgarian monasteries into a position of a constant pressure by the state to be modernized, in order to become profitable farms. The Holy Synod began to hire agronomists, who should develop plans to grow the monastic farms, but this requires time and above all, funds, which is hard to be provided by the monastic administration. Despite difficulties, plans are being developed for modernization and optimization of the monastic farms, as is the case with Bachkovo monastery reviewed in this article. Business plan is reviewed that is consistent with the market trends and transformation of production into a profitable one.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikolay Atanasov, 2025. "Wartime Impact over the Monastic Economics in Bulgaria (1913–1930). The Case of Bachkovo Monastery," Proceedings of the Centre for Economic History Research, Centre for Economic History Research, vol. 10, pages 364-373, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ceh:journl:y:2025:v:10:p:364-373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://csii.bg/series/2025-10/pdf/30-NikolayAtanasov.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://csii.bg/series/2025-10/html/30-NikolayAtanasov.htm
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • N34 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - Europe: 1913-
    • N94 - Economic History - - Regional and Urban History - - - Europe: 1913-
    • Z12 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Religion
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ceh:journl:y:2025:v:10:p:364-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivan Roussev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csiisbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.