IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlswr/v18y2023i1id97-2022-swr.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of the soil organic carbon in the LUCAS soil database based on spectral clustering

Author

Listed:
  • Baoyang Liu

    (School of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, P.R. China)

  • Baofeng Guo

    (School of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, P.R. China)

  • Renxiong Zhuo

    (School of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, P.R. China)

  • Fan Dai

    (School of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, P.R. China)

  • Haoyu Chi

    (School of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, P.R. China)

Abstract

The estimation of the level of the soil organic carbon (SOC) content plays an important role in assessing the soil health state. Visible and Near Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy (Vis-NIR DRS) is a fast and cheap tool for measuring the SOC. However, when this technology is applied on a larger area, the soil prediction accuracy decreases due to the heterogeneity of the samples. In this paper, we first investigate the global model performance in the LUCAS EU-wide topsoil database. Then, different clustering strategies were tested, including the k-means clustering based on the principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering, combined with the partial least squares regression (PLSR) models, and a clustering based on a local PLSR approach. The best validation results were obtained for the local PLSR approach with R2 = 0.75, root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP) = 13.38 g/kg and ratio of performance to interquartile range (RPIQ) = 2.846, but the algorithm running time was 30.05 s. Similar results were obtained for the k-means clustering method with R2 = 0.75, RMSEP = 14.61 g/kg and RPIQ = 2.844, at only 4.52 s. This study demonstrates that the PLSR approach based on k-means clustering is able to achieve similar prediction accuracy as the local PLSR approach, while significantly improving the algorithm speed. This provides the theoretical basis for adapting the spectral soil model to the needs of real-time SOC quantification.

Suggested Citation

  • Baoyang Liu & Baofeng Guo & Renxiong Zhuo & Fan Dai & Haoyu Chi, 2023. "Prediction of the soil organic carbon in the LUCAS soil database based on spectral clustering," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 18(1), pages 43-54.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlswr:v:18:y:2023:i:1:id:97-2022-swr
    DOI: 10.17221/97/2022-SWR
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://swr.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/97/2022-SWR.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://swr.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/97/2022-SWR.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/97/2022-SWR?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antoine Stevens & Marco Nocita & Gergely Tóth & Luca Montanarella & Bas van Wesemael, 2013. "Prediction of Soil Organic Carbon at the European Scale by Visible and Near InfraRed Reflectance Spectroscopy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giacomo Crucil & Fabio Castaldi & Emilien Aldana-Jague & Bas van Wesemael & Andy Macdonald & Kristof Van Oost, 2019. "Assessing the Performance of UAS-Compatible Multispectral and Hyperspectral Sensors for Soil Organic Carbon Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Jasiewicz Jarosław & Cierniewski Jerzy, 2021. "SALBEC – A Python Library and GUI Application to Calculate the Diurnal Variation of the Soil Albedo," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 40(3), pages 95-107, September.
    3. Tao Liu & Huan Zhang & Tiezhu Shi, 2020. "Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon Density in a Small-Scale Area Using Geographically Weighted Regression Kriging Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Hobimiarantsoa Rakotonindrina & Kensuke Kawamura & Yasuhiro Tsujimoto & Tomohiro Nishigaki & Herintsitohaina Razakamanarivo & Bruce Haja Andrianary & Andry Andriamananjara, 2020. "Prediction of Soil Oxalate Phosphorus using Visible and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Natural and Cultivated System Soils of Madagascar," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Theodora Angelopoulou & Athanasios Balafoutis & George Zalidis & Dionysis Bochtis, 2020. "From Laboratory to Proximal Sensing Spectroscopy for Soil Organic Carbon Estimation—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Richter, Franziska & Jan, Pierrick & El Benni, Nadja & Lüscher, Andreas & Buchmann, Nina & Klaus, Valentin H., 2021. "A guide to assess and value ecosystem services of grasslands," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    7. Kuntal M. Hati & Nishant K. Sinha & Monoranjan Mohanty & Pramod Jha & Sunil Londhe & Andrew Sila & Erick Towett & Ranjeet S. Chaudhary & Somasundaram Jayaraman & Mounisamy Vassanda Coumar & Jyoti K. T, 2022. "Mid-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy for Estimation of Soil Properties of Alfisols from Eastern India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Konstantinos Karyotis & Theodora Angelopoulou & Nikolaos Tziolas & Evgenia Palaiologou & Nikiforos Samarinas & George Zalidis, 2021. "Evaluation of a Micro-Electro Mechanical Systems Spectral Sensor for Soil Properties Estimation," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Meyer, Hanna & Reudenbach, Christoph & Wöllauer, Stephan & Nauss, Thomas, 2019. "Importance of spatial predictor variable selection in machine learning applications – Moving from data reproduction to spatial prediction," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 411(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlswr:v:18:y:2023:i:1:id:97-2022-swr. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.