IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlrae/v57y2011i4id41-2010-rae.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biogas composition depending on the type of plant biomass used

Author

Listed:
  • M. Herout

    (Department of Technological Equipment of Buildings, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • J. Malaťák

    (Department of Technological Equipment of Buildings, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • L. Kučera

    (Department of Technological Equipment of Buildings, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • T. Dlabaja

    (Department of Technological Equipment of Buildings, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The aim of the work is to determine and analyse concentrations of individual biogas components according to the used raw materials based on plant biomass. The measurement is focused on biogas production depending on input raw materials like maize silage, grass haylage and rye grain. The total amount of plant biomass entering the fermenter during the measurement varies at around 40% w/w, the rest is liquid beef manure. The measured values are statistically evaluated and optimised for the subsequent effective operation of the biogas plant. A biogas plant operating on the principle of wet anaerobic fermentation process is used for the measurement. The biogas production takes place during the wet fermentation process in the mesophile operation at an average temperature of 40°C. The technology of the biogas plant is based on the principle of using two fermenters. It follows from the measured results that maize silage with liquid beef manure in the ratio of 40:60 can produce biogas with a high content of methane; this performance is not stable. At this concentration of input raw material, the formation of undesirable high concentrations of hydrogen sulphide occurs as well. It is shown from the results that the process of biogas production is stabilised by the addition of other components of plant biomass like grass haylage and rye grain and a limitation of the formation of hydrogen sulphide occurs. It follows from the results that the maize silage should form about 80% w/w from the total amount of the plant biomass used.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Herout & J. Malaťák & L. Kučera & T. Dlabaja, 2011. "Biogas composition depending on the type of plant biomass used," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(4), pages 137-143.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlrae:v:57:y:2011:i:4:id:41-2010-rae
    DOI: 10.17221/41/2010-RAE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rae.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/41/2010-RAE.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://rae.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/41/2010-RAE.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/41/2010-RAE?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lehtomäki, A. & Huttunen, S. & Rintala, J.A., 2007. "Laboratory investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: Effect of crop to manure ratio," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 591-609.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chibuzo Stanley Nwankwo & Chigozie Francis Okoyeuzu & Ikpeama Ahamefula, 2020. "Efficiency of a modified plastic tank as a bio-degradation system in Sub-Saharan African countries," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(3), pages 89-96.
    2. D. Sochr & R. Adamovský & J. Kára & I. Hanzlíková, 2014. "Evaluation of the influence of fermentation input substrates preparation on biogas production intensity," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(2), pages 60-67.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rahul Kadam & Sangyeol Jo & Jonghwa Lee & Kamonwan Khanthong & Heewon Jang & Jungyu Park, 2024. "A Review on the Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Livestock Manures in the Context of Sustainable Waste Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Ammenberg, Jonas & Feiz, Roozbeh, 2017. "Assessment of feedstocks for biogas production, part II—Results for strategic decision making," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 388-404.
    3. Kasinath, Archana & Fudala-Ksiazek, Sylwia & Szopinska, Malgorzata & Bylinski, Hubert & Artichowicz, Wojciech & Remiszewska-Skwarek, Anna & Luczkiewicz, Aneta, 2021. "Biomass in biogas production: Pretreatment and codigestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Gabrielle M. Myers & Daniel S. Andersen & Bobby J. Martens & D. Raj Raman, 2023. "Cost Assessment of Centralizing Swine Manure and Corn Stover Co-Digestion Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, May.
    5. M. Samer & E. M. Abdelsalam & S. Mohamed & H. Elsayed & Y. Attia, 2022. "Impact of photoactivated cobalt oxide nanoparticles addition on manure and whey for biogas production through dry anaerobic co-digestion," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 7776-7793, June.
    6. Blengini, G.A. & Brizio, E. & Cibrario, M. & Genon, G., 2011. "LCA of bioenergy chains in Piedmont (Italy): A case study to support public decision makers towards sustainability," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 36-47.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlrae:v:57:y:2011:i:4:id:41-2010-rae. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.