IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v67y2021i5id371-2020-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Export intensity and competitiveness of Indonesia's crude palm oil to main destination countries

Author

Listed:
  • Fachry Husein Rosyadi

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

  • Jangkung Handoyo Mulyo
  • Hani Perwitasari

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

  • Dwidjono Hadi Darwanto

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

Abstract

Palm oil is a superior product from Indonesia that is continuously and widely used for daily needs such as cooking, grooming, and manufacturing. However, this potential must be supported by oil palm business actors' performance to maintain its intensity and competitiveness. This study investigates how various factors affect Indonesia's crude palm oil (CPO) export intensity and competitiveness by employing panel regression and the basic gravity model. The panel data used here is a 20-year time series with cross-sections from five major importers from 1999 to 2018. The results show that the importer's gross domestic product (GDP) and quantity of export significantly and positively affect Indonesia's CPO export intensity, while the exporter's GDP and economic distance has a significant and negative effect. The factors that positively and significantly influence competitiveness are soybean's import value and Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) certification, while Malaysian CPO's export and population of importing countries negatively affect Indonesian CPO competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Fachry Husein Rosyadi & Jangkung Handoyo Mulyo & Hani Perwitasari & Dwidjono Hadi Darwanto, 2021. "Export intensity and competitiveness of Indonesia's crude palm oil to main destination countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(5), pages 189-199.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:67:y:2021:i:5:id:371-2020-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/371/2020-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/371/2020-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/371/2020-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/371/2020-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Shanping & Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada, 2014. "A panel data analysis of trade creation and trade diversion effects: The case of ASEAN–China Free Trade Area," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 138-151.
    2. Myong Keun Eor, 2004. "Analysis of the Factor Endowments and Agricultural Trade for Economic Cooperation in Northeast Asia," East Asian Economic Review, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, vol. 8(1), pages 143-167.
    3. Patricia Hofmann, 2013. "International Trade, FDI and Economic Growth: Terms, Interdependencies and Research Focus," Contributions to Economics, in: The Impact of International Trade and FDI on Economic Growth and Technological Change, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 9-27, Springer.
    4. Zaki Mehchy & Rabie Nasser & Marc Schiffbauer, 2015. "Trade determinants and potential of Syria: using a gravity model ‘with an estimation of the Syrian crisis’ impact on exports’," Middle East Development Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 226-251, July.
    5. Aron TOROK & Attila JAMBOR, 2016. "Determinants of the revealed comparative advantages: The case of the European ham trade," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(10), pages 471-482.
    6. Attila JAMBOR & Jeremias BALOGH & Peter KUCSERA, 2016. "Country and industry specific determinants of intra-industry agri-food trade in the Baltic Countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(6), pages 280-291.
    7. Patricia Hofmann, 2013. "The Impact of International Trade and FDI on Economic Growth and Technological Change," Contributions to Economics, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-34581-4, December.
    8. Bergstrand, Jeffrey H, 1989. "The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 71(1), pages 143-153, February.
    9. repec:pal:coneco:978-3-642-34581-4 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Dusan SIMO & Ladislav MURA & Jan BULECA, 2016. "Assessment of milk production competitiveness of the Slovak Republic within the EU-27 countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(10), pages 482-492.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuldeep Kumar Lohani, 2024. "Trade Flow of India with BRICS Countries: A Gravity Model Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(1), pages 22-39, February.
    2. Caporale, Guglielmo Maria & Sova, Anamaria & Sova, Robert, 2015. "Trade flows and trade specialisation: The case of China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 261-273.
    3. M. Bruna Zolin & Utai Uprasen, 2018. "Trade creation and diversion: effects of EU enlargement on agricultural and food products and selected Asian countries," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 351-373, December.
    4. Tenzin Tamang & Hoan Phung Tien, 2020. "Intertwined World: Economic Networks, Positionality And Growth," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 25, pages 109-133, June.
    5. Sunil Dash, 2024. "In the Gains from Trade as Firms Matter, So Do Their Sizes," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 18(1-2), pages 134-159, February.
    6. Katerina Gradeva & Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso, 2016. "Are Trade Preferences more Effective than Aid in Supporting Exports? Evidence from the ‘Everything But Arms’ Preference Scheme," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(8), pages 1146-1171, August.
    7. Mausumi Kar, 2018. "Economic Integration And Trade Protection: Policy Issues For South Asian Countries," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 36(1), pages 167-182, January.
    8. Yvonne Umulisa, 2020. "Estimation of the East African Community's trade benefits from promoting intra‐regional trade," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 32(1), pages 55-66, March.
    9. Peter Egger & Michael Pfaffermayr, 2004. "Foreign Direct Investment and European Integration in the 1990s," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 99-110, January.
    10. Acar, Mustafa & Afyonoglu, Burcu & Kus, Savas & Vural, Bengisu, 2007. "Turkey’s Agricultural Integration with the EU: Quantifying the Implications," Conference papers 331657, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. Subrata Ghatak & Andromachi S. Piperakis, 2007. "The impact of Eastern European immigration to UK trade," Economics Discussion Papers 2007-3, School of Economics, Kingston University London.
    12. David Law & Murat Genç & John Bryant, 2013. "Trade, Diaspora and Migration to New Zealand," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 582-606, May.
    13. Markus Brueckner & Ngo Van Long & Joaquin L. Vespignani, 2020. "Non-Gravity Trade," Globalization Institute Working Papers 388, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
    14. Schaak, Henning, 2015. "The Impact of Free Trade Agreements on International Agricultural Trade: A Gravity Application on the Dairy Product Trade and the ASEAN-China-FTA," 55th Annual Conference, Giessen, Germany, September 23-25, 2015 211619, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    15. repec:osf:socarx:etmzk_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Mutti, John & Grubert, Harry, 2004. "Empirical asymmetries in foreign direct investment and taxation," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 337-358, March.
    17. Piotr Bórawski & Marta Guth & Andrzej Parzonko & Tomasz Rokicki & Aleksandra Perkowska & James William Dunn, 2021. "Price volatility of milk and dairy products in Poland after accession to the EU," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(3), pages 111-119.
    18. Guglielmo Caporale & Christophe Rault & Robert Sova & Anamaria Sova, 2009. "On the bilateral trade effects of free trade agreements between the EU-15 and the CEEC-4 countries," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(3), pages 573-573, October.
    19. Michele FRATIANNI & Chang HOON HO, 2007. "On the Relationship Between RTA Expansion and Openness," Working Papers 288, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    20. repec:ilo:ilowps:369300 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Christophe Rault & Robert Sova & Ana Maria Sova, 2009. "Modelling international trade flows between CEEC and OECD countries," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(15), pages 1547-1554.
    22. Marie M Stack & Rob Ackrill & Martin Bliss, 2019. "Sugar trade and the role of historical colonial linkages," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 46(1), pages 79-108.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:67:y:2021:i:5:id:371-2020-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.