IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v56y2010i2id1487-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The methods of valuation in agricultural accounting

Author

Listed:
  • Jaroslav SEDLÁČEK

    (Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

This paper deals with the valuation of the biological assets and agricultural production. There are analyzed two approaches: Czech and international. The International Accounting Standards are emulative of more authentic presentment of economic processes in agricultural activities than Czech accounting legislation. From the comparison the both approaches accrued some differences, which can influent the financial statements of enterprises. The causation of main difference appears an application of fair value, which is prescribed for biological assets and agricultural production in international accounting standards. In international accounting standards is preferred principle of fair and true view, while in Czech accounting is preferred prudence principle.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaroslav SEDLÁČEK, 2010. "The methods of valuation in agricultural accounting," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(2), pages 59-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:56:y:2010:i:2:id:1487-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/1487-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/1487-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/1487-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/1487-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrik Svoboda, 2007. "Reporting of tangible fixed assets pursuant to the Czech accounting law and International Accounting Standards IAS/IFRS and US GAAP [Vykazování hmotného dlouhodobého majetku dle českého účetního pr," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 55(6), pages 255-264.
    2. Patrik Svoboda & Emil Svoboda, 2007. "Tangible fixed assets of a company pursuant to the czech accounting law and international accounting standards," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 57-65.
    3. J. Ryska & A. Valder, 2006. "Is valuation of property a real science?," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(3), pages 123-127.
    4. Aboody, David & Barth, Mary E. & Kasznik, Ron, 1999. "Revaluations of fixed assets and future firm performance: Evidence from the UK1," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1-3), pages 149-178, January.
    5. P. Svoboda, 2007. "Valuation of tangible fixed assets pursuant to the Czech accounting law and international accounting standards," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 53(10), pages 466-474.
    6. Richard Dietrich, J. & Harris, Mary S. & MullerIII, Karl A., 2000. "The reliability of investment property fair value estimates," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 125-158, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaroslav Sedláček & Jindřiška Kouřilová & Jiří Pšenčík, 2012. "Models of the realistic reporting of subsidies in the farm accounting," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(1), pages 34-40.
    2. David PROCHÃ ZKA, 2017. "Specifics Of Ifrs Adoption By Central And Eastern European Countries: Evidence From Research," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 64(1), pages 59-81, March.
    3. Takashi Obinata, 2002. "Concept and Relevance of Income," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-171, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    4. Jindřiška KOUŘILOVÁ & Jaroslav SEDLÁČEK, 2014. "Environmental accounting and the FADN as a basis of model for detecting the material flow cost accounting," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(9), pages 420-429.
    5. Árni Claessen, 2021. "Relevance of Level 3 fair value disclosures and IFRS 13: a case study," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(4), pages 378-390, December.
    6. Mehnaz, Laura & Rahman, Asheq & Kabir, Humayun, 2023. "Covenant violation concern and investors’ pricing of Level 3 fair value adjustments," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).
    7. Kristýna Havlová, 2016. "IFRS vs. CAL: summary of practical knowledge and identification of research questions," Ekonomika a Management, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(2).
    8. Michael D. Stuart & Richard H. Willis, 2020. "Use of independent valuation specialists in valuing employee stock options: evidence from IPOs," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 438-473, June.
    9. Adrienna Huffman, 2018. "Asset use and the relevance of fair value measurement: evidence from IAS 41," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1274-1314, December.
    10. Dechow, Patricia & Ge, Weili & Schrand, Catherine, 2010. "Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 344-401, December.
    11. Zachary King & Thomas J. Linsmeier & Daniel D. Wangerin, 2024. "Differences in the value relevance of identifiable intangible assets," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 3838-3886, December.
    12. Juan Manuel García Lara & Beatriz García Osma & Belén Gill de Albornoz Noguer, 2006. "Effects of database choice on international accounting research," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 42(3‐4), pages 426-454, September.
    13. José Veiga & Joaquim Fernandes & Cristina Gonçalves & Georgette Andraz, 2015. "The Relevance of Fair Value Across Countries: Firms Listed in Lisbon and Madrid Stock Exchange," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 3(1), pages 78-95.
    14. Philippe Touron, 2016. "Mesures de la performance et les autres éléments du résultat global (OCI) : état de l'art," Post-Print hal-01902529, HAL.
    15. Sarah B. Stuber & Chris E. Hogan, 2021. "Do PCAOB Inspections Improve the Accuracy of Accounting Estimates?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 331-370, March.
    16. Cairns, David & Massoudi, Dianne & Taplin, Ross & Tarca, Ann, 2011. "IFRS fair value measurement and accounting policy choice in the United Kingdom and Australia," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 1-21.
    17. Hanlon, Dean & Navissi, Farshid & Soepriyanto, Gatot, 2014. "The value relevance of deferred tax attributed to asset revaluations," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 87-99.
    18. Kingsley Olibe, 2001. "Assessing the usefulness of SEC Form 20-F disclosures using return and volume metrics: The case of U.K. firms," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 25(3), pages 343-357, September.
    19. Mao, Yaping & Renneboog, Luc, 2015. "Do managers manipulate earnings prior to management buyouts?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 43-61.
    20. Bright Asante-Appiah & Tamara A. Lambert, 2023. "The role of the external auditor in managing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reputation risk," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 2589-2641, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:56:y:2010:i:2:id:1487-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.