IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bsa/jtaken/v11y2025i1p157-174id2068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging policy and practice: The implementation of inventory accounting standards in Indonesian local governments

Author

Listed:
  • Soffan Marsus

  • Raynal Yasni

  • Muliani Sulya Fajarianti

  • Agung Arianto

  • Joko Sustiyo

Abstract

Inventory accounting plays a critical role in public sector financial management, supporting transparency, asset control, and budget accountability. This study examines the challenges associated with implementing inventory accounting standards in Indonesian local governments, with a particular focus on inventory recording, classification, and governance. Using an interpretive qualitative approach, the research draws on document analysis of national and international accounting standards and focus group discussions with government accounting practitioners. The findings reveal persistent difficulties in integrating financial and inventory systems, notably due to discrepancies in classification codes, incomplete asset handover documentation, and fragmented regulatory frameworks. The transition to digital inventory management remains hindered by limited technical capacity, system fragmentation, and inconsistent application of valuation methods, especially the use of first-in, first-out (FIFO) and first-expired, first-out (FEFO) approaches in the health and procurement sectors. These issues contribute to inefficiencies in financial reporting and elevate audit risks. The study highlights the need for regulatory harmonization, improved interdepartmental coordination, and stronger governance mechanisms to enhance compliance and transparency. The adoption of integrated digital tracking systems and standardized reporting procedures is also recommended to reduce inconsistencies and improve audit readiness. This research contributes to the literature by offering practical insights into regulatory misalignment and proposing strategies to improve inventory management in local government.

Suggested Citation

  • Soffan Marsus & Raynal Yasni & Muliani Sulya Fajarianti & Agung Arianto & Joko Sustiyo, 2025. "Bridging policy and practice: The implementation of inventory accounting standards in Indonesian local governments," Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia, vol. 11(1), pages 157-174.
  • Handle: RePEc:bsa:jtaken:v:11:y:2025:i:1:p:157-174:id:2068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jurnal.bpk.go.id/TAKEN/article/view/2068
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali M. Elharidy & Brian Nicholson & Robert W. Scapens, 2008. "Using grounded theory in interpretive management accounting research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(2), pages 139-155, June.
    2. Ali M. Elharidy & Brian Nicholson & Robert W. Scapens, 2008. "Using grounded theory in interpretive management accounting research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(2), pages 139-155, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Turienzo, Javier & Cabanelas, Pablo & Lampón, Jesús F., 2023. "Business models in times of disruption: The connected and autonomous vehicles (uncertain) domino effect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Vassili Joannides & Nicolas Berland, 2008. "Reactions to reading “Remaining consistent with method? An analysis of grounded theory research in accounting”: A comment on Gurd," Post-Print halshs-00340178, HAL.
    3. Rolf Brühl & Nils Horch & Mathias Orth, 2008. "Grounded Theory und ihre bisherige Anwendung in der empirischen Controlling- und Rechnungswesenforschung," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 299-323, December.
    4. Mary A. Malina & Hanne S.O. Nørreklit & Frank H. Selto, 2011. "Lessons learned: advantages and disadvantages of mixed method research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(1), pages 59-71, April.
    5. Rolf Brühl & Mathias Osann, 2010. "Stakeholdertheorie und Neoinstitutionalismus und ihre Beiträge zur Erklärung der freiwilligen Berichterstattung am Beispiel der immateriellen Ressourcen," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 277-298, November.
    6. Gunjan Sharma & Kushagra Kulshreshtha & Naval Bajpai, 2022. "Getting over the issue of theoretical stagnation: an exploration and metamorphosis of grounded theory approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 857-884, April.
    7. Larissa von Alberti‐Alhtaybat & Khaldoon Al‐Htaybat, 2010. "Qualitative accounting research: an account of Glaser's grounded theory," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(2), pages 208-226, June.
    8. Lukka, Kari & Modell, Sven, 2010. "Validation in interpretive management accounting research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 462-477, May.
    9. Vassili Joannides & N. Berland, 2008. "Reactions to Reading 'Remaining Consistent with Method? An Analysis of Grounded Theory Research in Accounting': A Comment on Gurd," Post-Print hal-00676581, HAL.
    10. Vassili Joannidès & Nicolas Berland, 2008. "Reactions to reading “Remaining consistent with method? An analysis of grounded theory research in accounting”," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(3), pages 253-261, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bsa:jtaken:v:11:y:2025:i:1:p:157-174:id:2068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Selvia Vivi Devianti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jurnal.bpk.go.id/index.php/TAKEN/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.