IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/brv/journl/v14y2016i1p93-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prezidentská Diplomacie: Srovnání Tří Brazilských Prezidentů (Presidential Diplomacy: Three Brazilian Presidents In A Comparative Perspective)

Author

Listed:
  • Irena Melounová

    (Středisko mezinárodních studií Jana Masaryka, Fakulta mezinárodních vztahů, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze)

Abstract

Role Brazílie na mezinárodní scéně roste od začátku nového milénia. V prezidentském politickém systému může hlava státu upravovat své zapojení do rozhodovacího procesu, a tak prezident F. H. Cardoso ukončil tradiční delegování zahraniční politiky výhradně Ministerstvu zahraničních věcí a představil nový fenomén prezidentské diplomacie. Odborníci však předpokládali, že po odchodu prezidenta Cardosa dojde k jeho úpadku. Komplexní analýza proaktivního zapojení posledních tří brazilských prezidentů do diplomacie ukazuje, že očekávání o vymizení prezidentské diplomacie se nenaplnila a že předchozí osobní zájem a zkušenost v dané oblasti mají rozhodující vliv na zahraničněpolitickou aktivitu prezidentů. Brazil’s role on the international scene has been growing since the beginning of the new millennium. In the presidential political system, the head of state can adjust his/her own involvement in decision-making processes, and so President F. H. Cardoso ended the traditional delegation of foreign policy exclusively to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and introduced a new phenomenon of presidential diplomacy. Scholars expected its decline after his retirement. A complex analysis of last three Brazilian presidents’ pro-active engagement in diplomacy concludes that these expectations did not prove true and that the previous personal interest and experience in the field have a decisive influence on presidents’ activity in foreign policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Irena Melounová, 2016. "Prezidentská Diplomacie: Srovnání Tří Brazilských Prezidentů (Presidential Diplomacy: Three Brazilian Presidents In A Comparative Perspective)," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(1), pages 93-118.
    • Handle: RePEc:brv:journl:v:14:y:2016:i:1:p:93-118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://fmv.euba.sk/RePEc/brv/journl/MV2016-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Flemes, Daniel, 2007. "Emerging Middle Powers' Soft Balancing Strategy: State and Perspectives of the IBSA Dialogue Forum," GIGA Working Papers 57, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shim, David, 2009. "A Shrimp amongst Whales? Assessing South Korea's Regional-power Status," GIGA Working Papers 107, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    2. Aleksandra Kuczyńska-Zonik, 2016. "Ruská Makká Moc V Baltských Krajinách (Russia’S Soft Power In The Baltic States)," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(1), pages 36-57.
    3. Schor Adriana, 2014. "South–South Cooperation and IBSA: More Trade in Politics," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Debashis Chakraborty & Pritam Banerjee & Dipankar Sengupta, 2012. "Developing Country Coalitions in WTO Negotiations: How cohesive would IBSAC (India, Brazil, South Africa, China) be?," Working Papers 1212, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.
    5. Alden, Christopher & le Pere, Garth, 2023. "Southern multilateralism from IBSA to NDB: synergies, continuities, and regional options," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119700, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Olyana Kinidbalyk, 2016. "Veľký Čiernomorský Región V Meniacom Sa Geopolitickom Kontexte (The Wider Black Sea Region Within The Changing Geopolitical Context)," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(1), pages 8-18.
    7. Rowland, Jill & Rice, Mason & Shenoi, Sujeet, 2014. "Whither cyberpower?," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 124-137.
    8. Petra Čekmeová, 2016. "Celková Faktorová Produktivita A Jej Determinanty V Európskej Únii (Total Factor Productivity And Its Determinants In The European Union)," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(1), pages 19-35.
    9. Beck, Martin, 2008. "Regional Politics in a Highly Fragmented Region: Israel's Middle East Policies," GIGA Working Papers 89, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    10. Sumantra Maitra, 2016. "Bol Putin K Západu Vždy Prieteľský? Interpretačná Štúdia Prvých Dvoch Funkčných Období Perzidenta Vladimíra Putina Vo Svetle Teórií Realizmu (Was Putin Ever Friendly To The West? An Expository Study O," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(1), pages 58-92.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    brazilští prezidenti; prezidentská diplomacie; analýza zahraniční politiky;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Y8 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines
    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H12 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Crisis Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brv:journl:v:14:y:2016:i:1:p:93-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mykhaylo Kunychka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eubaask.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.