IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ift/wpaper/1212.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Developing Country Coalitions in WTO Negotiations: How cohesive would IBSAC (India, Brazil, South Africa, China) be?

Author

Listed:
  • Debashis Chakraborty

    (Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, New Delhi, India)

  • Pritam Banerjee

    (Policy - South Asia, DH)

  • Dipankar Sengupta

    (Department of Economics, University of Jammu, Jammu)

Abstract

RICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) has emerged as a role model for the developing countries at large by building a sustainable dialogue on major policy issues. The ongoing stalemate at the Doha Round of Discussions under WTO is creating a major hurdle for the developing countries. In that context, the present analysis explores whether the WTO Member countries of BRICS, i.e., India, Brazil, South Africa and China (IBSAC), who possess tremendous potential to become the drivers of global economic growth, can also play a significant role at the multilateral negotiations for protecting developing country interests. IBSA is already an operational Dialogue Forum focusing on South-South Cooperation. IBSAC countries have earlier collaborated together in multilateral negotiations (e.g. G-20 for agriculture), but there exist considerable scope to improve the same further. The present analysis reveals that the IBSAC countries need time to become a formidable negotiating collaboration, given their presence in world trade. Also, the deeper trade reform already undertaken by China vis-à-vis IBSA countries makes collaboration between them on every WTO aspect difficult. The analysis indicates that IBSA would remain a more coherent bargaining coalition at WTO, while China would collaborate with it only when mutual interests overlap. It is however likely that the existing trade barriers in developed country markets would continue to provide opportunities for IBSAC to collaborate at times.

Suggested Citation

  • Debashis Chakraborty & Pritam Banerjee & Dipankar Sengupta, 2012. "Developing Country Coalitions in WTO Negotiations: How cohesive would IBSAC (India, Brazil, South Africa, China) be?," Working Papers 1212, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.
  • Handle: RePEc:ift:wpaper:1212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://203.190.248.10/RePEc/ift/workingpapers/EC-12-12.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2012
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Flemes, Daniel, 2007. "Emerging Middle Powers' Soft Balancing Strategy: State and Perspectives of the IBSA Dialogue Forum," GIGA Working Papers 57, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    2. Debashis Chakraborty & Animesh Kumar, 2012. "ASEAN and China: New Dimensions in Economic Engagement," China Report, , vol. 48(3), pages 327-349, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Irena Melounová, 2016. "Prezidentská Diplomacie: Srovnání Tří Brazilských Prezidentů (Presidential Diplomacy: Three Brazilian Presidents In A Comparative Perspective)," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(1), pages 93-118.
    2. Debashis CHAKRABORTY & Anushree CHAKRABORTY, 2017. "Economic and Political Cooperation between India and East Asia: The Emerging Perspective," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 144-158, June.
    3. Shim, David, 2009. "A Shrimp amongst Whales? Assessing South Korea's Regional-power Status," GIGA Working Papers 107, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    4. Aleksandra Kuczyńska-Zonik, 2016. "Ruská Makká Moc V Baltských Krajinách (Russia’S Soft Power In The Baltic States)," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(1), pages 36-57.
    5. Schor Adriana, 2014. "South–South Cooperation and IBSA: More Trade in Politics," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Alden, Christopher & le Pere, Garth, 2023. "Southern multilateralism from IBSA to NDB: synergies, continuities, and regional options," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119700, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Olyana Kinidbalyk, 2016. "Veľký Čiernomorský Región V Meniacom Sa Geopolitickom Kontexte (The Wider Black Sea Region Within The Changing Geopolitical Context)," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(1), pages 8-18.
    8. Rowland, Jill & Rice, Mason & Shenoi, Sujeet, 2014. "Whither cyberpower?," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 124-137.
    9. Petra Čekmeová, 2016. "Celková Faktorová Produktivita A Jej Determinanty V Európskej Únii (Total Factor Productivity And Its Determinants In The European Union)," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(1), pages 19-35.
    10. Debashis Chakraborty, 2014. "The Upcoming Indo-ASEAN CECA," China Report, , vol. 50(3), pages 259-276, August.
    11. Beck, Martin, 2008. "Regional Politics in a Highly Fragmented Region: Israel's Middle East Policies," GIGA Working Papers 89, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    12. Sumantra Maitra, 2016. "Bol Putin K Západu Vždy Prieteľský? Interpretačná Štúdia Prvých Dvoch Funkčných Období Perzidenta Vladimíra Putina Vo Svetle Teórií Realizmu (Was Putin Ever Friendly To The West? An Expository Study O," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(1), pages 58-92.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Trade Organizations; Negotiations;

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F51 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ift:wpaper:1212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: S. Balasubramanian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iifttin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.