IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/zfwige/v61y2017i1p38-55n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Offene Werkstätten und Postwachstumsökonomien: kollaborative Orte als Wegbereiter transformativer Wirtschaftsentwicklungen?

Author

Listed:
  • Lange Bastian

    (Georg-Simmel-Zentrum für Metropolenforschung, HU Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Privatanschrift: Brehmestrasse 22, 13187 Berlin, Germany Deutschland)

Abstract

Degrowth debates have recently paid attention to so called „Open Workshops“, e.g. bicycle repair shops, Repair Cafés, FabLabs and others, aiming at better understanding of open innovation processes. The discursive scenery adds further spatial typologies to the debate such as Living Labs, Real Laboratories and FabLabs. Against the dominating growth paradigms of many regional economic approaches, a very lively transdisciplinary debate seeking to cover new and alternative concepts of post-growth production processes can be observed. From the perspective of human and economic geography, the case of „Open Workshops“, demonstrates that there is no single paradigmatic shift towards one sustainable economy, but various contingents and case-specific economic developments. Focusing on the procedural transformative dimension, the capability to response to distinct problems and to design procedural solutions in peer-group thematic communities is more important than the factual material dimension saving various types of material goods and energy resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Lange Bastian, 2017. "Offene Werkstätten und Postwachstumsökonomien: kollaborative Orte als Wegbereiter transformativer Wirtschaftsentwicklungen?," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 61(1), pages 38-55, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:zfwige:v:61:y:2017:i:1:p:38-55:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/zfw-2016-0029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2016-0029
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/zfw-2016-0029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulrich Petschow, 2016. "How Decentralized Technologies Can Enable Commons-Based and Sustainable Futures for Value Creation," Progress in IS, in: Jan-Peter Ferdinand & Ulrich Petschow & Sascha Dickel (ed.), The Decentralized and Networked Future of Value Creation, pages 237-255, Springer.
    2. N/A, 2012. "The UK Economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 221(1), pages 3-3, July.
    3. N/A, 2016. "The UK Economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 235(1), pages 3-3, February.
    4. N/A, 2015. "The UK economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 231(1), pages 3-3, February.
    5. N/A, 2015. "The UK Economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 233(1), pages 3-3, August.
    6. N/A, 2015. "The UK Economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 234(1), pages 3-3, November.
    7. N/A, 2016. "The UK Economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 236(1), pages 49-49, May.
    8. N/A, 2012. "The UK economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 219(1), pages 3-3, January.
    9. N/A, 2015. "The UK economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 232(1), pages 3-3, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefan Ćetković & Aron Buzogány & Miranda Schreurs, 2016. "Varieties of clean energy transitions in Europe: Political-economic foundations of onshore and offshore wind development," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-18, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Anđelković Aleksandra & Milovanović Goran, 2021. "Supplier Selection Process Based on Green Approach," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 59(3), pages 391-407, September.
    3. Steve Harris & Jan Weinzettel & Gregor Levin, 2020. "Implications of Low Carbon City Sustainability Strategies for 2050," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Swati Sharma, 2021. "Towards an Understanding of the Indian Tourist Buying Airbnb Services," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Magali Duque & Abigail McKnight, 2019. "Understanding the relationship between inequalities and poverty: mechanisms associated with crime, the legal system and punitive sanctions," CASE Papers /215, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    6. Gkogkidis, Vasilis & Dacre, Nicholas, 2020. "Exploratory Learning Environments for Responsible Management Education Using Lego Serious Play," SocArXiv ek7th, Center for Open Science.
    7. István Kunos & Somayeh Kariman & Aigul Meirmanova, 2020. "Green Economy Sustainability in the UAE and Agrarian Leadership," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 16(02), pages 51-60.
    8. Massimo Peri, 2017. "Climate variability and the volatility of global maize and soybean prices," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(4), pages 673-683, August.
    9. Jaakko J. Jääskeläinen & Sakari Höysniemi & Sanna Syri & Veli-Pekka Tynkkynen, 2018. "Finland’s Dependence on Russian Energy—Mutually Beneficial Trade Relations or an Energy Security Threat?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, September.
    10. repec:prg:jnlpep:v:preprint:id:686:p:1-19 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Renato Ritter, 2022. "Banking Sector Exposures to Climate Risks - Overview of Transition Risks in the Hungarian Corporate Loan Portfolio," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 21(1), pages 32-55.
    12. Duque, Magali & Mcknight, Abigail, 2019. "Understanding the relationship between inequalities and poverty: mechanisms associated with crime, the legal system and punitive sanctions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103459, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Dacre, Nicholas & Senyo, PK & Reynolds, David, 2019. "Is an Engineering Project Management Degree Worth it? Developing Agile Digital Skills for Future Practice," SocArXiv 4b2gs, Center for Open Science.
    14. Nazlı Terzioğlu & Renee Wever, 2021. "Integrating Repair into Product Design Education: Insights on Repair, Design and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Giuseppe T. Cirella & Alessio Russo & Federico Benassi & Ernest Czermański & Anatoliy G. Goncharuk & Aneta Oniszczuk-Jastrzabek, 2021. "Energy Re-Shift for an Urbanizing World," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Adomas Balkevicius & Mark Sanctuary & Sigita Zvirblyte, 2020. "Fending off waste from the west: The impact of China's Operation Green Fence on the international waste trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(10), pages 2742-2761, October.
    17. Liridon Kryeziu & Mehmet Bağış & Mehmet Nurullah Kurutkan & Besnik A. Krasniqi & Artan Haziri, 2022. "COVID-19 impact and firm reactions towards crisis: Evidence from a transition economy," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 18(1), pages 169-196.
    18. Ken Coutts & Graham Gudgin & Jordan Buchanan, 2018. "How the Economics Profession Got It Wrong on Brexit," Working Papers wp493, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    19. Dennis Fixler & Marina Gindelsky & David S. Johnson, 2020. "Distributing Personal Income: Trends over Time," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring Distribution and Mobility of Income and Wealth, pages 589-603, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Olga Porro & Francesc Pardo-Bosch & Núria Agell & Mónica Sánchez, 2020. "Understanding Location Decisions of Energy Multinational Enterprises within the European Smart Cities’ Context: An Integrated AHP and Extended Fuzzy Linguistic TOPSIS Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-29, May.
    21. Lijuan Wang & Songbai Liu, 2020. "Study on the Influencing Factors and Consumer Behaviors of Bicycle Sharing in Beijing," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 1-40, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:zfwige:v:61:y:2017:i:1:p:38-55:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.